【摘要】：尋釁滋事罪是近年來我國刑法學(xué)界討論較多卻一直爭議較大的一個罪名，在司法實(shí)踐中，將不同類型的違法犯罪行為不當(dāng)歸入本罪的情況越來越多，尋釁滋事罪的口袋化問題日益突出。通過本文的研究，，筆者試圖通過刑法解釋論和刑事立法修改論兩個方面對這一問題進(jìn)行探討，運(yùn)用理論分析和數(shù)據(jù)分析的方法，逐步匡正尋釁滋事罪的界定范圍，厘清本罪的處罰標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，以應(yīng)對日漸明顯的本罪的口袋化問題。通過本文的分析，筆者試圖重構(gòu)尋釁滋事罪在刑法體系中的地位，理順其實(shí)質(zhì)內(nèi)涵和理論邊界，以期對我國刑事司法實(shí)踐起到一定借鑒作用。 本文分為四個部分，第一部分首先探討了尋釁滋事罪口袋化的概念和主要表現(xiàn)，認(rèn)為尋釁滋事罪口袋化，是指由于尋釁滋事罪在法條上表達(dá)模糊、法學(xué)理論上爭論不清，而導(dǎo)致司法實(shí)踐對相關(guān)行為隨意出入人罪，實(shí)際上在本罪中包容了多種犯罪、違法行為的一種現(xiàn)象。其主要表現(xiàn)在于法條對本罪的客體、主觀要件、客觀要件規(guī)定得都比較模糊，司法上對本罪的適用有較強(qiáng)的隨意性。同時，筆者還分析了國外刑法學(xué)對相關(guān)犯罪的處理情況，試圖尋求國外立法司法經(jīng)驗(yàn)對我國現(xiàn)狀的借鑒可能。第二部分主要分析了尋釁滋事罪口袋化的弊端，從其對我國刑法三大基本原則的影響來看，尋釁滋事罪口袋化問題會對我國刑法的實(shí)施產(chǎn)生消極影響。第三部分了描述尋釁滋事罪口袋化的具體原因，主要有立法理念方面、觀念繼承方面、司法實(shí)踐方面等九個原因，并對各個原因進(jìn)行了細(xì)致的分析。第四部分是本文的重點(diǎn)，其首先探討了尋釁滋事罪的立法意義，明確了本罪的立法意義在于重視人身危險性、重視預(yù)防作用；其次本文試圖在現(xiàn)行刑法的框架內(nèi)，通過解釋而尋求對尋釁滋事罪口袋化問題的適當(dāng)應(yīng)對，筆者對本罪客體、主體、客觀方面、罪與非罪、此罪與彼罪之間的各項(xiàng)問題進(jìn)行了探討，厘清了現(xiàn)行尋釁滋事罪的適用范圍；最后，本文認(rèn)為對于尋釁滋事罪，不應(yīng)當(dāng)輕言廢除，而應(yīng)當(dāng)在推敲本罪的本質(zhì)內(nèi)涵和刑法意圖的前提下，探索本罪的發(fā)展路徑，提出對本罪罪狀和法定刑的適當(dāng)修改意見。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the crime of provoking and causing trouble is one of the most controversial crimes in the criminal law circle of our country. In judicial practice, there are more and more cases in which different types of illegal and criminal acts are inappropriately classified as this crime. The pocket of the crime of provoking trouble is becoming increasingly prominent. Through the study of this paper, the author tries to discuss this problem through the theory of criminal law interpretation and the theory of criminal legislation revision, and uses the methods of theoretical analysis and data analysis to gradually correct the scope of the definition of the crime of provoking and causing trouble. Clarify the penalty standard of this crime, to deal with the increasingly obvious pocket of the crime. Through the analysis of this paper, the author tries to reconstruct the position of the crime of provoking and causing trouble in the criminal law system, straighten out its essential connotation and theoretical boundary, in order to play a certain reference role in the criminal judicial practice of our country. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part discusses the concept and main performance of the pocketization of the crime of provoking and causing trouble, and thinks that the pocketization of the crime of provoking and causing trouble refers to the ambiguity of the expression of the law in the article of law for the crime of seeking provocation and causing trouble, and the unclear debate in the theory of law. In fact, it contains a variety of crimes and illegal acts in this crime. Its main performance is that the object of the crime, subjective elements, objective elements of the provisions are relatively vague, judicial application of this crime has a strong arbitrariness. At the same time, the author also analyzes the situation of foreign criminal law dealing with the related crimes, trying to seek foreign legislative and judicial experience for reference to the current situation of our country. The second part mainly analyzes the drawback of the pocketization of the crime of provoking and causing trouble. From its influence on the three basic principles of criminal law of our country, the problem of the pocket of the crime of provoking and causing trouble will have a negative impact on the implementation of the criminal law of our country. The third part describes the specific reasons for the pocket of the crime of provoking trouble, mainly in the legislative concept, concept inheritance, judicial practice and other nine reasons, and has carried on the detailed analysis to each reason. The fourth part is the focal point of this article, which first discusses the legislative significance of the crime of provoking and causing trouble, and clarifies that the legislative significance of this crime lies in attaching importance to personal dangerousness and the role of prevention; Secondly, this paper tries to find a proper solution to the problem of pocketization of the crime of provocation and trouble through explanation within the framework of the current criminal law. The author tries to deal with the object, subject, objective aspect, crime and non-crime of this crime. The problems between this crime and the crime are discussed, and the scope of application of the current crime of provoking and causing trouble is clarified. Finally, this article holds that the crime of seeking trouble should not be abolished lightly, but on the premise of examining the essence of the crime and the intention of the criminal law, exploring the development path of the crime, and putting forward the appropriate amendment to the crime count and the legal punishment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐岱;張維;;刑事政策下的尋釁滋事罪立法及其完善——以《中華人民共和國刑法修正案(八)草案》為視角[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2010年06期

2 李永升;談我國刑法中四“口袋罪”的修改[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);1991年06期

3 王良順;尋釁滋事罪廢止論[J];法商研究;2005年04期

4 劉萬奇;杜江平;;民眾情緒與司法理性——試論“民憤”影響刑事司法的合理限度[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年04期

5 于志剛;;口袋罪的時代變遷、當(dāng)前亂象與消減思路[J];法學(xué)家;2013年03期

6 陳興良;;人格刑法學(xué):以犯罪論體系為視角的分析[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年06期

7 宋峰,曹紅衛(wèi);試論尋釁滋事犯罪的司法認(rèn)定[J];北京人民警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年04期

8 趙琳琳;;民憤的反思:刑事司法的阿基里斯之踵[J];山西警官高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2007年01期

9 張曉菲;吳瑞;;淺論違警罪的概念及其處罰[J];甘肅警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年01期

10 李永升;;《刑法修正案(八)》內(nèi)容解析[J];刑法論叢;2011年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張維;尋釁滋事罪問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

本文編號：2407138