未遂犯處罰根據(jù)論:嬗變、選擇與檢驗(yàn)
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-11 12:00
【摘要】：我國未遂犯處罰根據(jù)論經(jīng)歷了由主客觀相統(tǒng)一說的混沌到客觀未遂論的勃興以及主觀未遂論的堅(jiān)守的理論嬗變。無論是根據(jù)當(dāng)代刑法的基本立場,還是參照世界范圍內(nèi)未遂犯理論、立法與判例的變遷,抑或從中國當(dāng)下的法治語境及客觀需要出發(fā),客觀未遂論較之于主觀未遂論,都是更為妥當(dāng)和可采的未遂犯處罰根據(jù)理論。不能犯的可罰性是檢驗(yàn)未遂犯處罰根據(jù)論的試金石。關(guān)于不能犯的危險(xiǎn)性的判斷,應(yīng)當(dāng)采取具體危險(xiǎn)說,以適當(dāng)?shù)亟缍ǹ闪P的未遂犯與不可罰的不能犯,避免抽象危險(xiǎn)說主觀主義的傾向以及對于不能犯的可罰性抽象肯定而具體否定的局限,防止客觀危險(xiǎn)說自然主義的傾向以及過于擴(kuò)張不可罰的不能犯范圍的弊端。
[Abstract]:The theory of the basis of penalty for attempted crime in China has undergone the theoretical evolution from the chaos of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity to the theory of objective attempt and the persevering of the theory of subjective attempt. Whether based on the basic standpoint of contemporary criminal law, or referring to the changes of the theory of attempted crime, legislation and jurisprudence in the world, or proceeding from the current context of rule of law and objective needs in China, the theory of objective attempt is compared with the theory of subjective attempt. Both are more appropriate and acceptable according to the theory of attempted offender punishment. The penalty of impossibility is the touchstone of the theory of penalty for attempted offense. With regard to the judgment of the danger of impossibility, the specific danger theory should be adopted, so as to properly define the punishable attempted offence and the non-punishable impossibility, It avoids the tendency of subjectivism in abstract danger theory and the limitation of abstract affirmation and specific negation of non-reprehensible nature, and prevents the tendency of objective danger theory of naturalism and the drawback of expanding the scope of irreparable crime.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D914
本文編號：2407108
[Abstract]:The theory of the basis of penalty for attempted crime in China has undergone the theoretical evolution from the chaos of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity to the theory of objective attempt and the persevering of the theory of subjective attempt. Whether based on the basic standpoint of contemporary criminal law, or referring to the changes of the theory of attempted crime, legislation and jurisprudence in the world, or proceeding from the current context of rule of law and objective needs in China, the theory of objective attempt is compared with the theory of subjective attempt. Both are more appropriate and acceptable according to the theory of attempted offender punishment. The penalty of impossibility is the touchstone of the theory of penalty for attempted offense. With regard to the judgment of the danger of impossibility, the specific danger theory should be adopted, so as to properly define the punishable attempted offence and the non-punishable impossibility, It avoids the tendency of subjectivism in abstract danger theory and the limitation of abstract affirmation and specific negation of non-reprehensible nature, and prevents the tendency of objective danger theory of naturalism and the drawback of expanding the scope of irreparable crime.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D914
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 尉朝陽;;論客觀危險(xiǎn)說的缺陷[J];法制與社會;2010年27期
2 鄭軍男;不能未遂犯論爭——“客觀危險(xiǎn)說”批判[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2002年06期
3 戚孟山;;不能未遂犯之危險(xiǎn)性判斷[J];法治論叢(上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2009年04期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 王俊;傳統(tǒng)客觀危險(xiǎn)說之提倡[D];中國青年政治學(xué)院;2013年
2 霍向黨;刑法中危險(xiǎn)的認(rèn)定及我國的選擇[D];河南大學(xué);2010年
，本文編號：2407108
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2407108.html
教材專著
