【摘要】：互毆與防衛(wèi)之間存在著對立關系:互毆可以否定防衛(wèi),而防衛(wèi)則需要排除互毆。在雙方互相的對打中,先動手的一方一般屬于侵害方,后動手的一方屬于防衛(wèi)方。但是,后動手一方的反擊行為,在具有事先斗毆意圖的情況下可以否定其行為的防衛(wèi)性。如果是即時的反擊行為,則可以認定其行為具有防衛(wèi)性。在預期的侵害場合,具有積極的加害意思則否定行為的防衛(wèi)性。如果是事先準備工具,在受到他人侵害的情況下利用事先準備的工具實施反擊行為,則應當認定其行為具有防衛(wèi)性。
[Abstract]:There is an antagonistic relationship between affray and defense: mutual affray can negate defense, and defense needs to exclude mutual affray. In the fight between the two sides, the first party belongs to the aggrieved party, and the latter party belongs to the defensive side. However, the reactionary counterattack behavior can deny its defensive nature if it has the intention to fight in advance. If it is an immediate counterattack, it can be determined that its behavior is defensive. In the anticipatory violation situation, the positive injurious meaning negates the defensive nature of the behavior. If it is a preparation tool, it should be regarded as defensive if it is used in the case of being attacked by others.
【作者單位】： 北京大學法學院;
【分類號】：D914
，

本文編號：2406662