【摘要】：禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)最樸素的價(jià)值理念是一事不再理。在國(guó)內(nèi),禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)作為一項(xiàng)原則,仍處于理論探討階段。立法中尚不能覓得其蹤,司法實(shí)踐中也處于摸索階段。理論研究中,禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)適用范圍比較寬泛,主要是用于禁止定罪事實(shí)之間重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)、定罪事實(shí)與量刑事實(shí)之間重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)。因種種原因,在具體探討該原則時(shí),學(xué)者傾向于從宏觀層面把握,即使有對(duì)該原則進(jìn)行具體分析的研究,大都局限于對(duì)想象競(jìng)合犯、累犯等不厭其煩地討論。而單獨(dú)針對(duì)量刑情節(jié)進(jìn)行重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)的研究鮮有報(bào)道。在量刑過(guò)程中,量刑情節(jié)的適用在很大程度上決定著行為人的刑期。受制于量刑情節(jié)本身的特質(zhì),在界定量刑情節(jié)、適用量刑情節(jié)的環(huán)節(jié),都存在對(duì)交叉事實(shí)重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)的可能性。本文通過(guò)對(duì)禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)單梳理和概述,為量刑情節(jié)的禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)進(jìn)行理論鋪墊；通過(guò)梳理量刑情節(jié)與犯罪構(gòu)成要件、定罪情節(jié)之間的關(guān)系,分析量刑情節(jié)識(shí)別環(huán)節(jié)的重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)及如何禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)的處理建議；通過(guò)對(duì)各種量刑情節(jié)之間的關(guān)系結(jié)合案件具體分析,為量刑情節(jié)適用過(guò)程中重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)的禁止提出處理辦法。在此基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)在我國(guó)立法中的法定化進(jìn)行了展望。
[Abstract]:It is forbidden to repeat evaluation of the most simple value of the idea that one thing is no longer reasonable. In China, the prohibition of repeated evaluation as a principle is still in the theoretical stage. Legislation can not find its trace, judicial practice is also in the groping stage. In the theoretical research, the scope of prohibition of repeated evaluation is relatively broad, mainly used to prohibit the repeated evaluation between the facts of conviction and sentencing. For a variety of reasons, scholars tend to grasp the principle from the macro level, even if there is a specific analysis of the principle, mostly confined to the imaginative co-offender, recidivism and so on. However, there are few reports on repeated evaluation of sentencing circumstances alone. In the process of sentencing, the application of sentencing circumstances to a large extent determines the perpetrator's sentence. Subject to the characteristics of the circumstances of sentencing, in defining the circumstances of sentencing, applicable to the circumstances of sentencing, there is the possibility of repeated evaluation of cross-facts. In this paper, the prohibition of repeated evaluation is simply combed and summarized to pave the way for the prohibition of repeated evaluation of sentencing circumstances. Through combing the relationship between the circumstances of sentencing and the elements of the crime, the relationship between the circumstances of conviction, the repeated evaluation of the identification of the circumstances of sentencing and the suggestions on how to prohibit the repeated evaluation are analyzed. Based on the analysis of the relationship between various circumstances of sentencing and the specific case analysis, this paper puts forward a method to deal with the prohibition of repeated evaluation in the course of the application of circumstances of sentencing. On the basis of this, the legalization of the prohibition of repeated evaluation in Chinese legislation is prospected.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D914

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 石經(jīng)海;;量刑思維規(guī)律下的量刑方法構(gòu)建[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2010年02期

2 周光權(quán);;量刑程序改革的實(shí)體法支撐[J];法學(xué)家;2010年02期

3 張勇;;量刑規(guī)范化改革及路徑選擇[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

4 李凱;侯潔;;論量刑情節(jié)的沖突及其處理[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

5 郭開(kāi)元;;禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則視域中的想象競(jìng)合犯[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

6 劉為軍,郭澤強(qiáng);禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則研究[J];山東公安專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

7 周光權(quán);;論禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)——以刑滿(mǎn)后發(fā)現(xiàn)同種余罪的處理為切入點(diǎn)[J];人民檢察;2012年09期

8 石經(jīng)海;;“量刑規(guī)范化”解讀[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2009年03期

9 姜濤;;論量刑中的禁止雙重評(píng)價(jià)原則及其實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];中共中央黨校學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

10 張向東;;從量刑基準(zhǔn)到基準(zhǔn)刑:量刑方法的革新[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2011年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李繼紅;量刑基準(zhǔn)問(wèn)題研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2349033