發(fā)布時間：2018-11-21 19:33

【摘要】：《刑法修正案(八)》的出臺將醉酒駕駛行為與追逐競駛行為納入刑法的打擊范圍,危險駕駛罪由此誕生。然而什么行為才是醉酒駕駛行為,醉酒的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)怎樣認(rèn)定,如何理解追逐競駛行為,其與飆車有何區(qū)別,追逐競駛行為的道路怎樣認(rèn)定等等,這些實踐當(dāng)中涌現(xiàn)的疑難問題一直困擾著實務(wù)界。而理論界目前對于危險駕駛罪的研究也存在諸多爭議,如該罪的行為犯與危險犯之爭長期存在,行為的既遂與著手標(biāo)準(zhǔn)也未形成共識。此外從立法上看,我國刑法對危險駕駛罪的規(guī)定也很不完善,一定程度上影響了該罪的司法適用。有鑒于此,本文對危險駕駛罪的疑難問題進(jìn)行深入探討,以期解決危險駕駛罪認(rèn)定難的問題,并試圖從立法上對危險駕駛罪進(jìn)行完善。全文共分為四個部分： 第一部分主要研究司法實踐當(dāng)中如何認(rèn)定危險駕駛罪的兩種行為方式,即醉酒駕駛和追逐競駛。結(jié)合目前司法解釋和行政法規(guī)、行政規(guī)章的規(guī)定,研究醉酒駕駛的具體認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和操作規(guī)范等,提出醉酒駕駛的含義,指出“醉駕”應(yīng)采取主觀與客觀相結(jié)合的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。同時對追逐競駛行為進(jìn)行界定,規(guī)范其適用范圍和定罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn),提出追逐競駛包括飆車和競賽行駛的觀點(diǎn)。 第二部分對危險駕駛罪的犯罪形態(tài)問題進(jìn)行深入探討。首先在評析學(xué)界關(guān)于危險駕駛罪到底為行為犯還是危險犯的不同觀點(diǎn)基礎(chǔ)上,指出行為犯說的錯誤之處,由此得出危險駕駛罪為抽象危險犯的結(jié)論并對主要理由進(jìn)行闡述；然后對危險駕駛罪的既遂和著手標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行研究,提出該罪具體的停止形態(tài)認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；最后對危險駕駛罪的共同犯罪形態(tài)問題進(jìn)行研究,并對該罪共犯的特殊情形提出具體處理方法。 第三部分主要研究危險駕駛罪與其相似罪名的界限。先從主、客觀方面研究其與交通肇事罪的界限,提出不應(yīng)將危險駕駛罪作為一種特殊的交通肇事罪來對待；再從客觀方面與犯罪形態(tài)角度對危險駕駛罪和以危險方法危害公共安全罪的界限進(jìn)行研究,提出二者的最大區(qū)別在于行為方式不同以及對實害結(jié)果的處理不同,以便更好地在實務(wù)中做好此罪與彼罪的區(qū)分。 第四部分對危險駕駛罪整體進(jìn)行了立法檢視,指出其存在罪狀含糊不清、行為方式列舉不全、刑罰結(jié)構(gòu)單一等問題,然后借鑒域外立法相關(guān)規(guī)定,提出完善我國危險駕駛罪的意見和建議,如增加行為方式,合理完善刑罰種類,增設(shè)危險駕駛致人死傷罪等。
[Abstract]:The introduction of the Criminal Law Amendment (8) brings drunk driving behavior and chasing driving behavior into the scope of the criminal law, and the crime of dangerous driving comes into being. However, what behavior is drunk driving behavior, how to determine the standard of drunken driving, how to understand the behavior of chasing race driving, what is the difference between it and racing cars, how to identify the road of chasing race driving behavior and so on, etc. The problems that appear in these practices have been puzzling the practice circle all the time. However, there are many controversies in the research of the crime of dangerous driving, such as the dispute between the crime and the crime of dangerous driving, and the standard of accomplishment and initiation of the crime has not reached a common understanding. In addition, from the legislative point of view, China's criminal law on the crime of dangerous driving is not perfect, to some extent affected the judicial application of the crime. In view of this, this paper makes a thorough discussion on the difficult problem of dangerous driving crime, in order to solve the problem that it is difficult to determine the dangerous driving crime, and try to perfect the dangerous driving crime from the legislation. The full text is divided into four parts: the first part mainly studies how to identify the dangerous driving crime in judicial practice, that is, drunk driving and chasing race driving. Combined with the current judicial interpretation and administrative regulations, this paper studies the specific identification standards and operational norms of drunken driving, puts forward the meaning of drunken driving, and points out that "drunken driving" should adopt the combination of subjective and objective standards. At the same time, it defines the behavior of chasing race driving, standardizes its applicable scope and standard of conviction, and puts forward the viewpoint that chase race driving includes racing cars and race driving. The second part discusses the crime form of dangerous driving crime. Firstly, on the basis of analyzing the different viewpoints of the academic circles on whether the crime of dangerous driving is an act crime or a dangerous crime, the author points out that the behavior crime is wrong, and then draws the conclusion that the dangerous driving crime is an abstract dangerous crime and expounds the main reasons. Then, the author studies the completion and initiation standards of the crime of dangerous driving, and puts forward the standard of the specific cessation of the crime. Finally, the paper studies the form of joint crime of dangerous driving crime, and puts forward specific treatment methods for the special circumstances of the accomplice of the crime. The third part mainly studies the boundary of dangerous driving crime and its similar charges. First, from the subjective and objective aspects of the study of the boundary between the crime and traffic accident, put forward that the crime of dangerous driving should not be treated as a special crime of traffic accident; From the angle of objective aspect and crime form, the paper studies the boundary of dangerous driving crime and endangering public safety crime by dangerous method, and points out that the biggest difference between them lies in the difference of behavior mode and the treatment of actual harm result. In order to do a better job in the practice of this crime and the distinction between that crime. The fourth part has carried on the legislative examination to the dangerous driving crime as a whole, pointed out that its existence crime is ambiguous, the behavior way enumerates incomplete, the penalty structure is single, and then draws lessons from the extraterritorial legislation related provisions. Some suggestions are put forward to improve the crime of dangerous driving in our country, such as increasing the behavior mode, reasonably perfecting the types of penalty, adding the crime of death and injury caused by dangerous driving and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周光權(quán);行為無價值論之提倡[J];比較法研究;2003年05期

2 張明楷;;日本刑法的發(fā)展及其啟示[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年01期

3 陳興良;;“風(fēng)險刑法”與刑法風(fēng)險:雙重視角的考察[J];法商研究;2011年04期

4 趙秉志;張磊;;“酒駕”危害行為的刑法立法對策[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年12期

5 劉憲權(quán);;處理高危駕車肇事案件的應(yīng)然標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];法學(xué);2009年09期

6 劉明祥;;有必要增設(shè)危險駕駛致人死傷罪[J];法學(xué);2009年09期

7 葉良芳;;危險駕駛罪的立法證成和規(guī)范構(gòu)造[J];法學(xué);2011年02期

8 楊志瓊;;美國醉駕的法律規(guī)制、爭議及啟示[J];法學(xué);2011年02期

9 曲新久;;醉駕不一律入罪無需依賴于“但書”的適用[J];法學(xué);2011年07期

10 楊興培;;從醉駕入罪看如何消弭法治分歧[J];法學(xué);2011年07期

，

本文編號：2348067