【摘要】：本文從刑法的出發(fā)點來討論食品安全犯罪問題。刑法應(yīng)該嚴厲打擊日益嚴重的食品安全犯罪問題。然而,我國刑法在食品安全保護上略有不足,無論是在犯罪上的規(guī)定,還是在刑罰的設(shè)置上都存在問題,為法律的使用造成了很多不便。主要體現(xiàn)為罪名的歸屬上存在爭議,食品安全犯罪侵害的是復(fù)雜客體,一是侵犯社會主義市場經(jīng)濟制度,二是侵犯了不特定多數(shù)人的身體健康,即公共安全。公共安全的法益對社會來說應(yīng)該是第一位的,所以應(yīng)將此罪歸類為危害公共安全罪一章中。行為方式的囊括還是有不足之處,例如缺少“采購”等行為方式的問題。主觀構(gòu)成要件方面刑法只規(guī)定本罪為故意犯罪,造成過失犯本罪的無法處罰。在刑法設(shè)置上罰金刑的比例失調(diào)。雖然兩高的司法解釋改善了刑法在這一問題與食品安全法的銜接,但還需稍加改動。在刑罰設(shè)置上,食品安全犯罪的罰金刑范圍過于寬泛,給法官的自由裁量空間過大,不符合罪行法定的要求,另外在設(shè)置種類上,沒有規(guī)定召回制度,對于單位犯罪沒收財產(chǎn)也應(yīng)該適用,是否增加資格刑等等,本文都給出了些許建議。
[Abstract]:This article discusses the problem of food safety crime from the point of view of criminal law. The criminal law should crack down on the increasingly serious problem of food safety crime. However, the criminal law of our country has some deficiencies in the protection of food safety, whether in the provisions of crime or in the setting of penalties, which has caused a lot of inconvenience to the use of the law. The crime of food safety infringes on the complex object, one is against the socialist market economy system, the other is the violation of the health of many people, that is, public safety. The legal interests of public security should be the first in society, so this crime should be classified as the crime of endangering public safety. There are still shortcomings in the inclusion of behavior, such as the lack of behavior such as purchasing. In terms of subjective elements, the criminal law only stipulates that the crime is intentional, which results in the irpunishment of negligent crime. The proportion of fine penalty in criminal law is out of proportion. Although the two higher judicial interpretations have improved the connection between the criminal law and the food safety law, some changes are needed. In terms of penalty setting, the scope of fine for food safety crimes is too broad, giving judges too much discretion, which does not meet the statutory requirements of the crime. In addition, there is no recall system in terms of the type of establishment. For unit crime confiscation of property should also apply, whether to increase the qualification penalty and so on, this paper gives some suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 田禾;;論中國刑事法中的食品安全犯罪及其制裁[J];江海學(xué)刊;2009年06期

2 彭玉偉;;論我國食品安全犯罪刑法規(guī)制的缺陷和完善[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會科學(xué)(漢文版);2009年04期

3 楊秀英;李曉君;;論我國食品犯罪罰金刑的完善[J];行政與法;2007年09期

4 劉偉;;風(fēng)險社會語境下我國危害食品安全犯罪刑事立法的轉(zhuǎn)型[J];中國刑事法雜志;2011年11期

5 黃星;;食品安全刑事規(guī)制路徑的重構(gòu)——反思以唯法益損害論為判斷標準規(guī)制食品安全關(guān)系[J];政治與法律;2011年02期

，

本文編號：2347538