詐騙罪財產(chǎn)處分行為研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-14 12:48
【摘要】：摘要：以往在司法實踐中,判斷詐騙罪通常將目光聚焦于欺騙行為,以欺騙手段非法獲取財產(chǎn)的行為即詐騙行為。隨著社會經(jīng)濟的不斷發(fā)展,財產(chǎn)犯罪的方式日益復(fù)雜化,刑法理論對詐騙罪的研究也在逐步深入。一方面,成立詐騙罪不僅要求欺騙行為,而且需要財產(chǎn)處分行為,且基于自愿的財產(chǎn)處分行為是詐騙罪區(qū)分于其他犯罪的獨有特征(已得到廣泛認同)。另一方面,對法人、機器是否具有財產(chǎn)處分的資格,不動產(chǎn)、財產(chǎn)性利益能否成為財產(chǎn)處分的對象等問題存在爭議。 首先,處分行為者的范圍與資格是受到限制的。以能否陷入錯誤認識為標準,否定幼兒、嚴重精神病患者、法人、機器等缺乏認識能力或者認識可能性的人成為處分者。另外,沒有處分權(quán)限的人也不能作為處分行為的實施者。其次,財產(chǎn)處分行為的構(gòu)成是重點討論的部分。處分的對象包括無體物、違禁品、財產(chǎn)性利益等,處分行為的方式有作為與不作為兩種形式。針對財產(chǎn)性利益、不動產(chǎn)和不完全基于錯誤認識的處分行為,有其特殊的表現(xiàn)形式。處分行為與錯誤認識間具有心理上的因果聯(lián)系,處分行為與財產(chǎn)損失之間應(yīng)當存在直接聯(lián)系,即處分行為之后無需其他違法行為就能造成財產(chǎn)損失。最后,處分意思是財產(chǎn)處分行為的必要條件。處分意思由認識、意志兩方面組成,其中對財產(chǎn)的認識程度上,對財產(chǎn)性質(zhì)的認識是必要的,無須認識到具體數(shù)量、價值,對財產(chǎn)種類的認識則需要根據(jù)社會經(jīng)驗具體判斷。處分意志是行為人處分行為的自愿性、自發(fā)性和自然性。本文針對一些長期爭論的問題以及理論上沒有注意到的問題,提出了創(chuàng)新性意見。對于處分行為人的資格,認為法律和合同能夠賦予某些本不具有處分資格的人處分權(quán)限,從而使之成為受騙者。處分行為與錯誤認識之間的因果聯(lián)系應(yīng)當是直接的、決定性的,并非只要陷入錯誤認識并處分財產(chǎn)就能作為詐騙罪中的處分行為看待。對財產(chǎn)性利益的處分不同于對普通財物的處分：基于財產(chǎn)性利益的特點,處分財產(chǎn)性利益并不需要實際交付或者登記,只要受騙者基于錯誤認識做出意思表示即可,當然,這種意思表示的結(jié)果是能夠最終導(dǎo)致財產(chǎn)損失的。
[Abstract]:Absrtact: in the past judicial practice, the judgment of fraud crime usually focuses on deceptive behavior, the act of obtaining property illegally by deception is fraud. With the development of society and economy, the way of property crime is becoming more and more complicated. On the one hand, the establishment of the crime of fraud requires not only deceptive behavior, but also property disposition, and based on voluntary disposition of property, it is the unique characteristic of fraud to distinguish it from other crimes (which has been widely accepted). On the other hand, whether the legal person, the machine has the property disposition qualification, the immovable property, the property interest can become the property disposition object and so on. First of all, the scope and qualifications of the offenders are limited. Based on the criterion of whether or not to fall into wrong cognition, people who lack the cognitive ability or the possibility of cognition, such as children, severe psychopath, legal person, machine and so on, are punished. In addition, the person who does not have the sanction authority also cannot act as the punishment perpetrator. Secondly, the composition of property disposition is the key part of the discussion. The objects of punishment include incorporeal objects, contraband goods, property interests and so on. There are special forms of property interests, immovable property and disposition based on false cognition. There is a psychological causal relationship between disposition and misconception, and there should be a direct connection between disposition and property loss, that is, property loss can be caused after punishment without other illegal acts. Finally, disposition is the necessary condition of property disposition. The intention of disposition consists of two aspects: cognition and will, in which it is necessary to recognize the nature of property to the degree of understanding of property, not to recognize the specific quantity and value, but to judge the type of property according to social experience. Disposition will is the volition, spontaneity and naturalness of the behavior of punishment. In this paper, some innovative suggestions are put forward in view of some long-debated problems and problems that have not been paid attention to in theory. As to the qualification of the punishment perpetrator, the law and the contract can give some people who do not have the disposition the authority to punish, thus make them become the deceiver. The causal relationship between punishment and misconception should be direct and decisive, and not be regarded as punishment in the crime of fraud as long as we fall into wrong understanding and dispose of property. The disposition of property interests is different from the disposition of ordinary property: based on the characteristics of property interests, disposition of property interests does not require actual delivery or registration, as long as the deceived person makes an expression of intention based on wrong understanding, of course, The result of this expression of will can eventually lead to property loss.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.35
本文編號：2331200
[Abstract]:Absrtact: in the past judicial practice, the judgment of fraud crime usually focuses on deceptive behavior, the act of obtaining property illegally by deception is fraud. With the development of society and economy, the way of property crime is becoming more and more complicated. On the one hand, the establishment of the crime of fraud requires not only deceptive behavior, but also property disposition, and based on voluntary disposition of property, it is the unique characteristic of fraud to distinguish it from other crimes (which has been widely accepted). On the other hand, whether the legal person, the machine has the property disposition qualification, the immovable property, the property interest can become the property disposition object and so on. First of all, the scope and qualifications of the offenders are limited. Based on the criterion of whether or not to fall into wrong cognition, people who lack the cognitive ability or the possibility of cognition, such as children, severe psychopath, legal person, machine and so on, are punished. In addition, the person who does not have the sanction authority also cannot act as the punishment perpetrator. Secondly, the composition of property disposition is the key part of the discussion. The objects of punishment include incorporeal objects, contraband goods, property interests and so on. There are special forms of property interests, immovable property and disposition based on false cognition. There is a psychological causal relationship between disposition and misconception, and there should be a direct connection between disposition and property loss, that is, property loss can be caused after punishment without other illegal acts. Finally, disposition is the necessary condition of property disposition. The intention of disposition consists of two aspects: cognition and will, in which it is necessary to recognize the nature of property to the degree of understanding of property, not to recognize the specific quantity and value, but to judge the type of property according to social experience. Disposition will is the volition, spontaneity and naturalness of the behavior of punishment. In this paper, some innovative suggestions are put forward in view of some long-debated problems and problems that have not been paid attention to in theory. As to the qualification of the punishment perpetrator, the law and the contract can give some people who do not have the disposition the authority to punish, thus make them become the deceiver. The causal relationship between punishment and misconception should be direct and decisive, and not be regarded as punishment in the crime of fraud as long as we fall into wrong understanding and dispose of property. The disposition of property interests is different from the disposition of ordinary property: based on the characteristics of property interests, disposition of property interests does not require actual delivery or registration, as long as the deceived person makes an expression of intention based on wrong understanding, of course, The result of this expression of will can eventually lead to property loss.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.35
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李世陽;;論詐騙罪中的財產(chǎn)處分行為[J];北京大學(xué)研究生學(xué)志;2011年02期
2 姜金良;;財產(chǎn)性利益可成為侵犯財產(chǎn)罪的犯罪對象——以盜竊欠條為例[J];濱州職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年01期
3 周光權(quán),李志強;刑法上的財產(chǎn)占有概念[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年02期
4 張明楷;財產(chǎn)性利益是詐騙罪的對象[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年03期
5 于改之,周玉華;訴訟詐騙行為的定性及相關(guān)問題探究——從詐騙罪之行為結(jié)構(gòu)的考察出發(fā)[J];法商研究;2005年04期
6 李翔;;論詐騙犯罪中的財產(chǎn)處分行為[J];法學(xué);2008年10期
7 任海濤;;刑法中的非法占有目的[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年06期
8 張紅昌;;論詐騙罪中的處分意識[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年01期
9 張明楷;論三角詐騙[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年02期
10 袁博;;論財物類詐騙罪中處分意識的構(gòu)造[J];中國檢察官;2013年12期
，本文編號：2331200
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2331200.html
