【摘要】：本文主在闡述我國(guó)關(guān)于環(huán)境犯罪刑法立法現(xiàn)狀,分析國(guó)內(nèi)對(duì)于環(huán)境刑法立法研究的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)我國(guó)環(huán)境犯罪刑事立法方面的問題進(jìn)行討論,同時(shí)提出完善建議。 文章主要從三個(gè)方面詳細(xì)論述我國(guó)刑事立法關(guān)于危害環(huán)境類犯罪的立法和完善。首先從我國(guó)關(guān)于環(huán)境犯罪刑事立法的沿革和現(xiàn)狀入手,結(jié)合考察了國(guó)外有代表性國(guó)家的環(huán)境刑法立法現(xiàn)狀和立法成果。在對(duì)國(guó)外立法理念考察的部分,筆者將生態(tài)倫理學(xué)內(nèi)容與刑事立法理念結(jié)合討論,并將現(xiàn)有國(guó)內(nèi)外觀點(diǎn)羅列分析,以期運(yùn)用比較研究法研究我國(guó)環(huán)境犯罪刑事立法的問題。其次,在闡述我國(guó)現(xiàn)有環(huán)境刑事立法的立法理念、立法模式、罪名體系和刑罰體系的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)其所存在的問題進(jìn)行分析研究。其中包括從刑事法律條文中體現(xiàn)出來的環(huán)境刑事立法理念不夠合理,將危害環(huán)境類犯罪設(shè)置在《刑法》第六章第六節(jié)下大大降低了該類罪名在刑法中的位階,我國(guó)危害環(huán)境類犯罪的罪名設(shè)置不夠完善,以及從刑罰原則和刑罰種類兩方面的規(guī)定分析我國(guó)環(huán)境犯罪刑罰體系的不足之處。最后,在汲取國(guó)外環(huán)境刑事立法中合理和成功之處的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國(guó)立法傳統(tǒng)、具體立法現(xiàn)狀以及現(xiàn)有立法水平,有針對(duì)性的提出筆者對(duì)完善我國(guó)環(huán)境犯罪刑法立法的建議。包括明確以可持續(xù)發(fā)展的環(huán)境倫理觀作為指導(dǎo)我國(guó)環(huán)境刑法的立法理念；并在肯定我國(guó)以刑法典模式集中規(guī)定環(huán)境犯罪的基礎(chǔ)上,提出將危害環(huán)境類犯罪從我國(guó)《刑法》第六章第六節(jié)中分離出來獨(dú)立成章；提出對(duì)我國(guó)環(huán)境犯罪罪名體系的擴(kuò)充以及現(xiàn)有罪名設(shè)置完善的建議；借鑒國(guó)外成功的刑罰原則和刑罰種類對(duì)我國(guó)環(huán)境犯罪刑罰體系進(jìn)行補(bǔ)充。
[Abstract]:On the basis of expounding the present situation of our country's criminal law on environmental crime and analyzing the domestic research of environmental criminal law, this paper discusses the problems in our country's criminal legislation of environmental crime, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect it at the same time. This article mainly discusses the legislation and perfection of our country's criminal legislation on environmental crimes from three aspects. Starting with the evolution and current situation of our country's criminal legislation on environmental crime, this paper investigates the current situation and achievements of environmental criminal law legislation in representative countries abroad. In the part of the investigation of foreign legislative ideas, the author combines the content of ecological ethics with the concept of criminal legislation, and lists and analyzes the existing domestic and foreign viewpoints in order to study the criminal legislation of environmental crime in China by means of comparative research. Secondly, on the basis of expounding the legislative idea, legislative model, charge system and penalty system of our country's environmental criminal legislation, the existing problems are analyzed and studied. This includes that the concept of environmental criminal legislation embodied in the criminal law provisions is not reasonable enough, and the crime of endangering the environment is set up under section 6 of Chapter 6 of the Criminal Law, which greatly reduces the rank of this kind of crime in the criminal law. The crime of endangering the environment is not perfect in our country, and the inadequacies of the penalty system of environmental crime in our country are analyzed from two aspects: the principle of penalty and the type of penalty. Finally, on the basis of drawing on the rationality and success of foreign environmental criminal legislation, combined with our legislative tradition, specific legislative status and existing legislative level, the author puts forward some suggestions to improve the criminal law legislation of environmental crime in China. Including the concept of environmental ethics of sustainable development as the guidance of our country's environmental criminal law, and on the basis of affirming the centralized regulation of environmental crime in the mode of criminal code in our country, This paper proposes to separate the environmental crimes from the sixth section of Chapter 6 of the Criminal Law of our country, and puts forward some suggestions on how to expand the crime system of environmental crimes in China and how to set up and perfect the existing charges. Draw lessons from foreign successful penalty principle and penalty type to complement our country environmental crime penalty system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳英慧;關(guān)鳳榮;;中日環(huán)境犯罪問題比較[J];河北法學(xué);2009年12期

2 王志茹;生態(tài)危機(jī)與刑法的生態(tài)化[J];華北工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2004年02期

3 朱珍華;試析我國(guó)刑法中的嚴(yán)格責(zé)任[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

4 同利平;試析破壞環(huán)境資源保護(hù)罪[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1998年02期

5 吳獻(xiàn)萍;;論我國(guó)環(huán)境犯罪刑事立法的完善[J];昆明理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期

6 馮軍;尹孟良;;日本環(huán)境犯罪的防治經(jīng)驗(yàn)及其對(duì)中國(guó)的啟示[J];日本問題研究;2010年01期

7 陶衛(wèi)東;;論環(huán)境犯罪嚴(yán)格責(zé)任原則之有限適用[J];法學(xué)論壇;2009年01期

8 曹子丹,顏九紅;關(guān)于環(huán)境犯罪若干問題的探討[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;1998年04期

9 李光祿,牛忠志;論刑事嚴(yán)格責(zé)任原則的合理性——以污染環(huán)境犯罪為例[J];山東公安專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

10 張福德;;美國(guó)環(huán)境犯罪的刑事政策及其借鑒[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)家;2008年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2258883