運輸毒品罪的司法認定問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-15 18:59
【摘要】：運輸毒品罪作為我國毒品犯罪中的罪名之一，通常與走私、販賣、制造毒品等行為伴隨發(fā)生，我國刑法并未對運輸毒品罪的犯罪形態(tài)、犯罪特征做具體規(guī)定，這給司法實踐工作帶來不少困難，然而作為高發(fā)性的毒品犯罪行為，筆者認為應(yīng)對運輸毒品罪的司法認定問題作出具體研究以提高司法機關(guān)的辦案效率且減少此類案件判決罪刑不相應(yīng)情況的發(fā)生。本文采用實證分析法、文獻研究法、比較分析法、功能分析法，從三個案例出發(fā)引出爭議問題，并結(jié)合國內(nèi)外關(guān)于研究運輸毒品罪相關(guān)文獻，分析比較其中的不同觀點，在此基礎(chǔ)上，提出自己的看法。本文分三個部分進行闡述，包括運輸毒品罪的客觀方面的認定、運輸毒品罪的主觀方面的認定以及運輸毒品罪的既遂與未遂的認定。首先在客觀方面，提出兩個司法實踐中常見的難題，即毒品運輸距離與認定運輸毒品罪的關(guān)系以及運輸摻雜摻假毒品的數(shù)量認定。通過論述得出毒品運輸距離較短不影響運輸毒品罪的成立，運輸毒品行為的關(guān)鍵在于使毒品發(fā)生流通，危害了國家對毒品的管制秩序，開始產(chǎn)生一定的社會危害性。認定毒品數(shù)量不進行純度折算但應(yīng)當進行純度鑒定，要將毒品純度作為重要的量刑情節(jié)。其次，在運輸毒品罪的主觀方面的認定問題上，筆者的觀點是間接故意能夠構(gòu)成運輸毒品罪，且提出認定行為人對其運輸毒品具有間接故意的具體方法，這也為司法實踐中判斷行為人對運輸毒品是否具有明知的故意提供了一種認定思路。最后，，筆者論述了運輸毒品罪的既遂和未遂的認定，提出應(yīng)當以“起運既遂說”作為運輸毒品罪的既未遂狀態(tài)的認定標準，即行為人只要將毒品起運，這種行為狀態(tài)就已經(jīng)屬于運輸毒品罪的既遂狀態(tài)，并分析了不同運輸毒品行為的既未遂狀態(tài)的認定。
[Abstract]:The crime of transporting drugs, as one of the crimes in drug crimes in China, is usually accompanied by such acts as smuggling, trafficking and manufacture of drugs. The criminal law of our country does not specify the form and characteristics of the crime of transporting drugs. This brings a lot of difficulties to the judicial practice. However, as a high-incidence drug crime, The author thinks that the problem of judicial cognizance of the crime of transporting drugs should be studied in order to improve the efficiency of handling cases of the judicial organs and to reduce the occurrence of mismatch in the judgment of this kind of cases. This paper uses empirical analysis method, literature research method, comparative analysis method, functional analysis method, starting from three cases to lead to the controversial issues, and combined with the domestic and foreign research on the crime of drug transport literature, analysis and comparison of the different views. On this basis, put forward their own views. This article is divided into three parts, including the identification of the objective aspects of the crime of transporting drugs, the subjective aspect of the crime of transporting drugs and the confirmation of the accomplishment and attempt of the crime of transporting drugs. Firstly, two common problems in judicial practice are put forward, that is, the relationship between the distance of drug transportation and the crime of drug transportation and the quantity determination of adulterated drugs. The conclusion is that the short distance of drug transportation does not affect the establishment of the crime of transporting drugs. The key of drug transport behavior lies in the circulation of drugs, which endangers the order of national drug control and begins to produce certain social harmfulness. The quantity of drugs should not be converted, but the purity should be identified, and the purity of drugs should be taken as an important sentencing circumstance. Secondly, in the subjective aspect of the crime of transporting drugs, the author holds that the indirect intention can constitute the crime of transporting drugs, and puts forward the specific method of determining the perpetrator's indirect intention to transport drugs. This also provides a way to judge whether the doer knowingly and intentionally carries drugs in judicial practice. Finally, the author discusses the determination of the accomplished and attempted crime of transporting drugs, and puts forward that the crime of transporting drugs should be regarded as the standard of identification of the attempted state of the crime of transporting drugs, that is, the perpetrator should only start the transportation of drugs. This kind of behavior state already belongs to the accomplished state of the crime of transporting drugs, and analyzes the identification of the attempted state of different drug transport behaviors.
【學位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.36
本文編號：2244196
[Abstract]:The crime of transporting drugs, as one of the crimes in drug crimes in China, is usually accompanied by such acts as smuggling, trafficking and manufacture of drugs. The criminal law of our country does not specify the form and characteristics of the crime of transporting drugs. This brings a lot of difficulties to the judicial practice. However, as a high-incidence drug crime, The author thinks that the problem of judicial cognizance of the crime of transporting drugs should be studied in order to improve the efficiency of handling cases of the judicial organs and to reduce the occurrence of mismatch in the judgment of this kind of cases. This paper uses empirical analysis method, literature research method, comparative analysis method, functional analysis method, starting from three cases to lead to the controversial issues, and combined with the domestic and foreign research on the crime of drug transport literature, analysis and comparison of the different views. On this basis, put forward their own views. This article is divided into three parts, including the identification of the objective aspects of the crime of transporting drugs, the subjective aspect of the crime of transporting drugs and the confirmation of the accomplishment and attempt of the crime of transporting drugs. Firstly, two common problems in judicial practice are put forward, that is, the relationship between the distance of drug transportation and the crime of drug transportation and the quantity determination of adulterated drugs. The conclusion is that the short distance of drug transportation does not affect the establishment of the crime of transporting drugs. The key of drug transport behavior lies in the circulation of drugs, which endangers the order of national drug control and begins to produce certain social harmfulness. The quantity of drugs should not be converted, but the purity should be identified, and the purity of drugs should be taken as an important sentencing circumstance. Secondly, in the subjective aspect of the crime of transporting drugs, the author holds that the indirect intention can constitute the crime of transporting drugs, and puts forward the specific method of determining the perpetrator's indirect intention to transport drugs. This also provides a way to judge whether the doer knowingly and intentionally carries drugs in judicial practice. Finally, the author discusses the determination of the accomplished and attempted crime of transporting drugs, and puts forward that the crime of transporting drugs should be regarded as the standard of identification of the attempted state of the crime of transporting drugs, that is, the perpetrator should only start the transportation of drugs. This kind of behavior state already belongs to the accomplished state of the crime of transporting drugs, and analyzes the identification of the attempted state of different drug transport behaviors.
【學位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.36
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條
1 周利民;如何區(qū)分運輸毒品罪[J];公安大學學報;2001年02期
2 聶慧蘋;;運輸毒品罪的法律辨析[J];山西警官高等�？茖W校學報;2009年01期
3 楊高峰;販賣、運輸毒品罪既遂標準探討[J];江西公安�？茖W校學報;2005年03期
4 李士勇;運輸毒品罪主觀要件研究[J];鐵道警官高等專科學校學報;2005年03期
5 李昌林;;論走私、販賣、運輸、制造毒品罪[J];西南政法大學學報;2000年02期
6 肖敏;;運輸毒品罪既遂、未遂問題探析[J];西南政法大學學報;2007年01期
7 蔡傳洪;販賣、運輸、還是持有毒品?[J];中國刑事法雜志;1999年02期
8 黃祥青;淺析販賣、運輸毒品罪的既遂和未遂[J];政治與法律;1999年03期
本文編號：2244196
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2244196.html
