【摘要】：因果流程偏離包括狹義的因果流程偏離、結(jié)果的延后發(fā)生、結(jié)果的提前發(fā)生以及打擊錯誤。錯誤論認(rèn)為因果流程偏離的難點(diǎn)在于故意的認(rèn)定,因果關(guān)系論認(rèn)為因果流程偏離的關(guān)鍵在于客觀歸責(zé)的判斷。但是,這兩種立場都有"倒果為因"的嫌疑——根據(jù)結(jié)論的需要來進(jìn)行故意或客觀歸責(zé)的判斷,因此難以避免判斷的恣意性。因果流程偏離的適用應(yīng)采取主觀歸責(zé)論,即在肯定了故意與客觀歸責(zé)的基礎(chǔ)上再從規(guī)范上判斷結(jié)果能否歸責(zé)于故意。主觀歸責(zé)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不是計劃理論,也不是故意危險理論,而是構(gòu)成要件理論。
[Abstract]:Causality process deviation includes narrow causality process deviation, delay of result, early occurrence of result and strike error. The error theory holds that the difficulty of causality flow deviation lies in the intentional identification, and the causality theory believes that the key of causality flow deviation lies in the judgment of objective imputation. However, these two positions have the suspicion of "turning the fruit down as the cause"-the judgment of intentional or objective imputation is carried out according to the need of conclusion, so it is difficult to avoid the arbitrariness of judgment. The application of causality flow deviation should adopt subjective imputation theory, that is, on the basis of affirming intentional and objective imputation, we can judge whether the result can be attributed to intention from the standard. The criterion of subjective imputation is not the theory of plan, nor the theory of intentional danger, but the theory of constitutive elements.
【作者單位】： 東南大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部“新世紀(jì)優(yōu)秀人才支持計劃”(NCET-13-0125)資助
【分類號】：D914
，

本文編號：2230308