【摘要】："非法占有目的"是盜竊罪的不成文構(gòu)成要件要素,判斷行為人取回自己所有而被他人合法占有財(cái)物的行為是否具有非法占有目的,以行為人是否進(jìn)行事后索賠作為判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)具有可行性,且行為人事后索賠獲得的數(shù)額即是非法占有數(shù)額。質(zhì)權(quán)人占有質(zhì)物所產(chǎn)生的利益數(shù)額具有不確定性,無法認(rèn)定破壞占有所造成的具體損失數(shù)額是否達(dá)到盜竊罪的起刑點(diǎn)。民間借貸糾紛若能夠運(yùn)用前置法解決則不宜輕易將其納入刑法評(píng)價(jià)體系。
[Abstract]:"the purpose of illegal possession" is an important element of the unwritten elements of the crime of larceny, which determines whether the act of the actor taking back his own property and being legally possessed by another person has the purpose of illegal possession. It is feasible to judge whether the actor made a claim after the event, and the amount obtained by the actor after the claim is the amount of illegal possession. The amount of interest generated by the possessor of the pledge is uncertain and it is impossible to determine whether the amount of specific loss caused by the destruction of possession reaches the starting point of the crime of larceny. If the folk loan dispute can be solved by the former method, it should not be easily included in the criminal law evaluation system.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學(xué)研究生教育學(xué)院;華東師范大學(xué)高等教育研究所;
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3;D920.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 荀毅;;詐騙與合同詐騙的區(qū)別及非法占有目的的認(rèn)定——以王火紅詐騙案為例[J];新西部(理論版);2013年20期

2 楊春萍;劉華潔;;論合同詐騙罪中非法占有目的的認(rèn)定——以孫某合同詐騙案為例[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年03期

3 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 吳興鼐;“吳英集資案”非法占有目的認(rèn)定[D];南京師范大學(xué);2014年

2 傅迪;“機(jī)場(chǎng)黃金案”評(píng)析[D];湖南大學(xué);2014年

3 張鴿子;蔡某等搶劫案評(píng)析[D];湖南大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2182413