【摘要】：聚眾犯罪是我國(guó)刑法中一種常見的犯罪類型。由于與其他一些犯罪相比，其發(fā)生的頻率相對(duì)較低，加之各個(gè)聚眾犯罪散落于刑法分則中，理論和實(shí)務(wù)界對(duì)聚眾犯罪的司法適用并未形成統(tǒng)一的認(rèn)識(shí)，因此，學(xué)界關(guān)于聚眾犯罪研究的熱衷度并不高，有關(guān)聚眾犯罪處罰差異性的研究更是稀少，甚至找不到直接的研究資料。本文試以此為切入點(diǎn)，論述存在此種差異性的合理依據(jù)和意義，為司法實(shí)踐的合理運(yùn)用找到理論根據(jù)。 具體而言，本文共分為三個(gè)部分： 第一部分：聚眾犯罪處罰差異性之概述。本章結(jié)合現(xiàn)有刑法分則的規(guī)定，從聚眾犯罪處罰范圍的差異和聚眾犯罪主體法定刑的差異兩個(gè)角度對(duì)聚眾犯罪進(jìn)行分類。當(dāng)然，進(jìn)行分類的前提是正確梳理聚眾犯罪的特征，明晰聚眾犯罪的范圍，認(rèn)識(shí)聚眾犯罪的主體。 第二部分：聚眾犯罪處罰差異性之合理性論證。本章探討了存在差異性的原因，共從法益侵害差異、被害人過錯(cuò)、處罰和預(yù)防犯罪必要性和刑罰輕緩化四個(gè)方面闡述此種差異性的依據(jù)，并在此基礎(chǔ)上分析處罰差異性的立法意義和司法意義。 第三部分：聚眾犯罪處罰差異性之實(shí)踐運(yùn)用。本章主要解讀在司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)聚眾犯罪的認(rèn)定。該部分以存在不同責(zé)任主體為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)將聚眾犯罪分為三類，并結(jié)合典型罪名的具體案例，還原司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)聚眾犯罪的認(rèn)定過程。
[Abstract]:Mass crime is a common type of crime in Chinese criminal law. As compared with some other crimes, the frequency of their occurrence is relatively low, and each crime of mass crime is scattered in the special provisions of criminal law, the theory and practice circles have not formed a unified understanding of the judicial application of mass crime, therefore, There is not a high degree of enthusiasm for the study of mass crime in academic circles, and the research on the difference of punishment of crime gathering is even less, or even the direct research materials can not be found. This paper tries to use this as a starting point to discuss the reasonable basis and significance of the existence of such differences, to find a theoretical basis for the rational use of judicial practice. Specifically, this paper is divided into three parts: the first part: summary of the difference of crime punishment. Combined with the provisions of the existing criminal law, this chapter classifies mass crime from two aspects: the difference of punishment scope and the legal punishment of the subject of mass crime. Of course, the premise of classification is to correctly sort out the characteristics of mass crime, clear the scope of mass crime, and understand the subject of mass crime. The second part: the rationality demonstration of the difference of crime punishment. This chapter discusses the reasons for the difference, and expounds the basis of the difference from four aspects: the difference of legal interests, the fault of the victim, the necessity of punishment and the prevention of crime, and the mitigation of punishment. On this basis, the legislative and judicial significance of the difference of punishment is analyzed. The third part: the practice and application of the difference of crime punishment. This chapter mainly interprets the cognizance of mass crime in judicial practice. In this part, the crime of mass gathering is divided into three categories according to the standards of the existence of different subjects of responsibility, and combined with the specific cases of typical charges, the identification process of mass crime in judicial practice is reduced.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 樊建民;;聚眾犯罪若干問題探析[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2009年06期

2 初紅漫;;論被害人過錯(cuò)影響刑事責(zé)任之正當(dāng)依據(jù)[J];河北法學(xué);2012年01期

3 鄒江江;;聚眾犯罪與聚眾性之解構(gòu)[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年03期

4 劉德法;孔德琴;;關(guān)于聚眾犯罪客觀行為的司法認(rèn)定[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2009年01期

5 史衛(wèi)忠;;簡(jiǎn)論聚眾型犯罪[J];人民檢察;2011年09期

6 劉德法;孔德琴;;論聚眾犯罪的概念和法律特征[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

7 王志亮;張俊霞;;呼市越獄案的定性探討[J];犯罪研究;2010年06期

8 王新清;袁小剛;;論刑事案件中的被害人過錯(cuò)[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2008年02期

9 李祖華;;聚眾犯罪若干問題辨析[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2009年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2178081