【摘要】：當(dāng)前社會(huì),部分人為了達(dá)到其追求更多的經(jīng)濟(jì)及其他利益的目的,而不惜采取各種方法、使用各種手段,這使得訴訟,這一用來(lái)維護(hù)社會(huì)公平正義的程序也無(wú)端被非法利用,成為這些人謀利的工具;加之我國(guó)相關(guān)法律尚未對(duì)該種行為進(jìn)行具體明確的規(guī)制以及司法不力等方面的原因,使得訴訟欺詐在我國(guó)日益猖獗。而也正是由于我國(guó)刑法等有關(guān)法律對(duì)訴訟欺詐無(wú)明確的規(guī)定,使得在司法實(shí)踐中各法院對(duì)訴訟欺詐的定性存在天壤之別,有的以無(wú)罪論處,有的僅以民事制裁對(duì)該行為進(jìn)行規(guī)制,有的將之定性為詐騙罪,還有的將其歸入妨害司法罪……而理論界對(duì)訴訟欺詐亦存在罪與非罪,此罪與彼罪之爭(zhēng)。眾所周知,訴訟欺詐不僅侵害公私財(cái)產(chǎn)所有權(quán)以及被害人的其他合法權(quán)益,而且擾亂了司法秩序,浪費(fèi)有限的司法資源,具有極其嚴(yán)重的社會(huì)危害性。對(duì)于訴訟欺詐,用刑法對(duì)其進(jìn)行規(guī)制不僅符合法益保護(hù)原則,而且可以使我國(guó)法律體系或條文之間達(dá)到內(nèi)在的完善與融貫,增強(qiáng)法律體系的完整性與協(xié)調(diào)性。但是訴訟欺詐又有其特殊的內(nèi)涵與外延,其犯罪構(gòu)成不僅不同于財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪中的詐騙罪、敲詐勒索罪、搶劫罪及妨害司法罪中的偽證罪、妨害作證罪等,而且有異于刑法分則中的任一犯罪。有鑒于此,有必要對(duì)訴訟欺詐進(jìn)行單獨(dú)立法來(lái)予以規(guī)制。對(duì)于訴訟欺詐,國(guó)外有多種立法模式,通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)外立法模式的分析、借鑒,找出適合中國(guó)國(guó)情的模式,應(yīng)當(dāng)在我國(guó)刑法分則中設(shè)立訴訟欺詐罪,并將其歸入妨害司法罪中去。
[Abstract]:In the current society, some people, in order to achieve their goal of pursuing more economic and other interests, do not hesitate to adopt various methods and use various means, which makes litigation, the procedure used to safeguard social fairness and justice, to be used unjustifiably and illegally. To become the tool for these people to profit, coupled with the fact that the relevant laws of our country have not yet carried out the specific regulation of this kind of behavior and the lack of justice, which makes the litigation fraud rampant day by day in our country. But it is precisely because the criminal law and other relevant laws of our country do not have clear provisions on litigation fraud, so that in judicial practice, there is a great difference in the nature of litigation fraud in various courts, some of which are treated as innocent. Some only regulate the act with civil sanctions, some characterize it as fraud, and others classify it as an offence of obstruction of justice. But the theory circle also has the crime and the non-crime to the lawsuit fraud, this crime and that crime dispute. As we all know, litigation fraud not only infringes the public and private property ownership and other legitimate rights and interests of victims, but also disturbs the judicial order, wastes limited judicial resources, and has extremely serious social harm. In the case of litigation fraud, the use of criminal law not only conforms to the principle of legal interest protection, but also can make the internal perfection and integration between the legal system or provisions of our country, and enhance the integrity and coordination of the legal system. However, litigation fraud has its special connotation and extension, and its criminal constitution is not only different from the crime of fraud, extortion, robbery and perjury in the crime of obstruction of justice, and the crime of obstruction of testimony, and so on, which is not only different from the crime of fraud in property crime, the crime of extortion, the crime of robbery and obstruction of justice, etc. And there is a crime different from any of the specific provisions of the criminal law. In view of this, it is necessary to separate legislation to regulate litigation fraud. As for litigation fraud, there are many kinds of legislative models in foreign countries. Through the analysis of foreign legislative models and drawing lessons from them, we should find out the mode suitable for the national conditions of China. We should set up the crime of litigation fraud in the special provisions of criminal law of our country, and classify it into the crime of obstruction of justice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 游濤;;訴訟欺詐之刑法規(guī)制[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年01期

2 高銘暄;陳冉;;論“訴訟欺詐”行為的定性——與“訴訟欺詐”定性詐騙罪論者商榷[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年04期

3 陳桂明,李仕春;訴訟欺詐及其法律控制[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2169175