【摘要】：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的迅速發(fā)展所帶來的不僅僅是生活的便捷,同時(shí)也滋生了許多負(fù)面的衍生物,而近期最為泛濫的就是網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言,并且其中一部分社會(huì)危險(xiǎn)性極其嚴(yán)重的網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言不僅擾亂了互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的正常秩序,更是對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的公信力甚至民眾的價(jià)值觀產(chǎn)生了極大的危害,但傳統(tǒng)的刑法罪名體系在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中的適用卻屢遭困境。有鑒于此,2013年9月10日,最高人民法院和最高人民檢察院聯(lián)合出臺(tái)的《關(guān)于辦理利用信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)施誹謗等刑事案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》正式施行,這部解釋首次明確了利用信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)施誹謗、尋釁滋事等相關(guān)犯罪的入罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、行為模式和量刑規(guī)則,雖然一定程度上解決了網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言的刑法規(guī)制不足,但仍然存在很多的爭(zhēng)議,并且學(xué)界對(duì)刑法規(guī)制是否會(huì)影響言論自由等問題眾說紛紜,因此為了解決這些問題需要對(duì)刑事法律介入網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言治理的相關(guān)理論加以研究,并且針對(duì)司法解釋中條文中的爭(zhēng)議以及實(shí)踐落實(shí)中存在的問題進(jìn)行詳盡的分析,另外為了更好的治理網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言,同時(shí)也要對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言犯罪的刑法規(guī)制體系進(jìn)行完善。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of the Internet not only brings convenience to life, but also breeds a lot of negative derivatives. And some of the most dangerous Internet rumors not only disturb the normal order of the Internet, but also do great harm to the credibility of the Internet and even to the values of the people. However, the application of the traditional criminal law system in cyberspace has been beset with difficulties. In view of this, on September 10, 2013, the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate jointly issued the interpretation of several issues applicable to criminal cases such as the use of information networks for libel. This explanation, for the first time, clarifies the criminal standard, behavior patterns and sentencing rules for using the information network to commit libel, provoking disturbances, and other related crimes, although to a certain extent it resolves the inadequacy of the criminal law regulation of online rumors. However, there are still many disputes, and scholars have different opinions on whether the criminal law regulation will affect the freedom of speech and other issues. Therefore, in order to solve these problems, we need to study the relevant theories of criminal law intervention in the network rumor management. And in view of the dispute in the judicial interpretation and the problems existing in the practice of implementation, in addition, in order to better control the network rumors, but also to improve the criminal law regulation system of network rumor crime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 唐煜楓;王明輝;;刑法中言論的行為性辨析——以言論自由的界限為視角[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2006年03期

2 孫笑俠;司法權(quán)的本質(zhì)是判斷權(quán)——司法權(quán)與行政權(quán)的十大區(qū)別[J];法學(xué);1998年08期

3 孟傳香;;關(guān)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者不作為刑事責(zé)任問題的探討[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年06期

4 姜濤;;追尋理性的罪刑模式:把比例原則植入刑法理論[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2013年01期

5 張向東;;利用信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)施尋釁滋事犯罪若干問題探析[J];法律適用;2013年11期

6 孫萬(wàn)懷;盧恒飛;;刑法應(yīng)當(dāng)理性應(yīng)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言——對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)造謠司法解釋的實(shí)證評(píng)估[J];法學(xué);2013年11期

7 張文考;黃玉芬;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由的限度及其法律保護(hù)[J];黑龍江科技信息;2008年34期

8 高景芳,郝雷,張青;行政法之比例原則初論[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2003年02期

9 張明楷;;簡(jiǎn)評(píng)近年來的刑事司法解釋[J];清華法學(xué);2014年01期

10 文敏;;各國(guó)采取多種方法遏制網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言[J];新聞實(shí)踐;2013年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：2168018