瀆職罪中國家機關工作人員認定研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-26 19:20
【摘要】：1997年刑法修訂后,國家機關工作人員始終是瀆職罪認定中未解難題之一,由此造成瀆職罪適用困境：一面是造成嚴重社會危害的瀆職行為頻繁發(fā)生,一面是糾結國家機關工作人員判斷的司法工作人員瞻前顧后；瀆職罪的懲罰價值未得以充分發(fā)揮和引導價值未得以有效張揚。 問題主要是：在改革背景下,現(xiàn)實中許多不是國家機關的工作人員承擔國家機關職權職責,他們是不是瀆職罪中的國家機關工作人員范疇?從立法本意及以國家機關的語義理解國家機關工作人員,顯然這些人員不是瀆職罪中的國家機關工作人員。而實踐中,又以解釋路徑來解決部分不是國家機關的工作人員承擔國家機關職權職責適用瀆職罪情況。一方面,受制罪刑法定,解釋無法適應現(xiàn)實生活的多樣,另一方面,解釋本身又突破了國家機關的內涵,問題由此而來。當下,遏制瀆職已成為反腐敗共識,尋求這個問題解決路徑亦具現(xiàn)實意義。 盡管以國家機關的語義理解國家機關工作人員也是一種文理解釋,但是,文理解釋不限于詞義,還要考慮詞語在刑法條文中語義。基于條文的文理解釋,瀆職罪中國家機關工作人員的內涵應該是其與國家機關職權職責的聯(lián)系。這個內涵體現(xiàn)了瀆職罪主體的特殊性和法定性。 瀆職罪中國家機關工作人員要件是瀆職罪中國家機關工作人員內涵特征具體體現(xiàn),包括特殊性要件和能力要件,其中特殊性要件由國家機關職權職責、國家機關職權職責與承擔國家機關職權職責人對應關系等要件要素構成,這些要件要素是客觀的,集中體現(xiàn)瀆職罪中國家機關工作人員特殊性。 瀆職罪中國家機關工作人員特殊性要件要素的客觀性決定了國家機關工作人員在瀆職罪認定中的順序；國家機關職權、職責具有歷史性、變動性、共性、地域性；國家機關職權職責、國家機關職權職責與承擔國家機關職權職責人對應關系是判斷瀆職罪中國家機關工作人員的重要依據(jù),也是認定瀆職罪中國家機關工作人員重要方法。
[Abstract]:After the revision of the criminal law in 1997, the staff of the state organs have always been one of the unsolved problems in the crime of malfeasance, which causes the plight of the crime of dereliction of Duty: one side is the frequent occurrence of malfeasance caused by serious social harm, one side is the judicial workers who have tangled the judges of the state organs, and the punishment value of the crime of malfeasance has not been punished. To give full play to and guide the value has not been effectively publicized.
The main problem is: in the background of reform, in reality, many of the staff members of the state organs are not responsible for the authority of the state organs. Are they the category of the staff of the state organs in the crime of malfeasance? From the original meaning of the legislation and the understanding of the staff of the state organs with the semantics of the state organs, these are not the state machines in the crime of dereliction of duty. On the other hand, the interpretation itself has broken through the connotation of the state organs. On the other hand, the explanation itself has broken through the connotation of the state organs, and the problem comes from it. To curb dereliction of duty has become a consensus on anti-corruption. It is also of practical significance to find a solution to this problem.
Although it is also a kind of literary and rational explanation to understand the staff of state organs with the semantic meaning of state organs, the interpretation of the arts and Sciences is not limited to the meaning of words, but also the meaning of words in the provisions of the criminal law. Based on the literary and rational interpretation of the provisions, the connotation of the staff of the Chinese family in the crime of malfeasance should be the connection with the duties of the state organs. It embodies the particularity and legality of the subject of the crime of dereliction of duty.
The elements of the crime of dereliction of duty in Chinese organs are the specific connotation of the crime of malfeasance, including the special elements and the elements of ability, among which the special elements are composed of the functions and functions of the state organs, the duties of the state authority and the corresponding relationship between the responsibilities of the state organs and functions, and other elements. The elements are objective, and concentrate on the particularity of the staff of the Chinese organs in malfeasance.
The objectivity of the particularity elements of the crime of malfeasance determines the order of the state organ staff in the identification of the crime of malfeasance; the functions and functions of the state organs are historical, variable, common and regional; the functions and functions of the state organs, the duties of the state organs and the responsibilities of the state organs and powers The Department is an important basis for judging the staff members of the Chinese organs of dereliction of duty, and is also an important method for identifying the staff members of the Chinese organs in the crime of dereliction of duty.
【學位授予單位】：安徽大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.393
本文編號：2147036
[Abstract]:After the revision of the criminal law in 1997, the staff of the state organs have always been one of the unsolved problems in the crime of malfeasance, which causes the plight of the crime of dereliction of Duty: one side is the frequent occurrence of malfeasance caused by serious social harm, one side is the judicial workers who have tangled the judges of the state organs, and the punishment value of the crime of malfeasance has not been punished. To give full play to and guide the value has not been effectively publicized.
The main problem is: in the background of reform, in reality, many of the staff members of the state organs are not responsible for the authority of the state organs. Are they the category of the staff of the state organs in the crime of malfeasance? From the original meaning of the legislation and the understanding of the staff of the state organs with the semantics of the state organs, these are not the state machines in the crime of dereliction of duty. On the other hand, the interpretation itself has broken through the connotation of the state organs. On the other hand, the explanation itself has broken through the connotation of the state organs, and the problem comes from it. To curb dereliction of duty has become a consensus on anti-corruption. It is also of practical significance to find a solution to this problem.
Although it is also a kind of literary and rational explanation to understand the staff of state organs with the semantic meaning of state organs, the interpretation of the arts and Sciences is not limited to the meaning of words, but also the meaning of words in the provisions of the criminal law. Based on the literary and rational interpretation of the provisions, the connotation of the staff of the Chinese family in the crime of malfeasance should be the connection with the duties of the state organs. It embodies the particularity and legality of the subject of the crime of dereliction of duty.
The elements of the crime of dereliction of duty in Chinese organs are the specific connotation of the crime of malfeasance, including the special elements and the elements of ability, among which the special elements are composed of the functions and functions of the state organs, the duties of the state authority and the corresponding relationship between the responsibilities of the state organs and functions, and other elements. The elements are objective, and concentrate on the particularity of the staff of the Chinese organs in malfeasance.
The objectivity of the particularity elements of the crime of malfeasance determines the order of the state organ staff in the identification of the crime of malfeasance; the functions and functions of the state organs are historical, variable, common and regional; the functions and functions of the state organs, the duties of the state organs and the responsibilities of the state organs and powers The Department is an important basis for judging the staff members of the Chinese organs of dereliction of duty, and is also an important method for identifying the staff members of the Chinese organs in the crime of dereliction of duty.
【學位授予單位】：安徽大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.393
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前7條
1 王志祥;關于瀆職罪主體有權解釋的思考及立法建議[J];法商研究;2005年06期
2 翟寶紅;;瀆職罪主體問題研究[J];法制與社會;2007年04期
3 劉沛賢;;論我國瀆職罪主體的司法認定[J];法制與社會;2010年35期
4 雍易平;;論瀆職罪主體的立法缺陷與完善[J];法制與社會;2011年30期
5 陳智元;;國內外瀆職罪犯罪主體比較[J];國際關系學院學報;2007年01期
6 張小林;;農(nóng)村基層組織工作人員瀆職罪主體資格探析[J];法制與社會;2012年34期
7 張勝英;;瀆職罪主體探析[J];濮陽職業(yè)技術學院學報;2006年04期
，本文編號：2147036
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2147036.html
