【摘要】：摘要：緩刑作為一項刑事制度,因其在避免短期自由刑易導(dǎo)致犯罪感染方面的重要作用,在刑事政策中被譽為除刑罰和保安處分之外的第三支柱,深受刑罰制度的寵愛。然而由于我國緩刑制度起步較晚,且是法律移植(1910年公布的《大清新刑律》照搬日本、德國等西方國家的刑法典對緩刑的規(guī)定)的結(jié)果,未能緊密結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)實法制意識的總體狀況,導(dǎo)致緩刑制度在立法上存在缺陷；而缺乏完善理論體系及立法的支持,致使在具體司法實踐過程中不僅不能實現(xiàn)緩刑制度的價值,而且還導(dǎo)致大眾對這項刑事制度產(chǎn)生誤解,導(dǎo)致了我國緩刑制度總體適用率低下,且絕大部分為職務(wù)犯罪案件,司法實踐過程中問題層出不窮：如緩刑適用條件難以操作、緩刑適用率在地域上存在較大的差異、整體緩刑適用率低,而職務(wù)犯罪緩刑適用率高于其他犯罪、緩刑適用受審判前的強制措施影響等等。 論文從緩刑制度一般理論性出發(fā),通過對比中外緩刑制度,深入分析我國緩刑制度的現(xiàn)狀,對緩刑制度執(zhí)行程序、緩刑考驗期考察制度、緩刑制度中社區(qū)矯正的執(zhí)行等方面提出理論性的建議：如針對未成年犯罪人建立罪的緩宣告緩刑；緩刑適用增加個人情況判斷；增設(shè)有關(guān)緩刑負(fù)擔(dān)、緩刑指示的規(guī)定；構(gòu)建緩刑聽證程序；完善緩刑撤銷程序；完善緩刑考察主體；建立社區(qū)服刑人員信息化管理系統(tǒng)等。
[Abstract]:Absrtact: as a criminal system, probation is regarded as the third pillar besides punishment and security measures in criminal policy because of its important role in avoiding the crime infection caused by short-term free punishment. However, because of the late start of probation system in our country, and it is the result of law transplantation (the Great Clean Criminal Law published in 1910 copying the criminal code of Japan, Germany and other western countries), The lack of close combination of the general situation of our country's realistic legal consciousness leads to the defects in the legislation of probation system, and the lack of perfect theoretical system and legislative support, which results in the failure to realize the value of the probation system in the concrete judicial practice process. It also leads the public to misunderstand the criminal system, which leads to the low application rate of the probation system in our country, and most of the cases are job-related crimes. In the course of judicial practice, problems emerge in endlessly, such as the difficult to operate the applicable conditions of probation. There are great differences in the application rate of probation in the region, the application rate of the whole probation is low, and the probation rate of duty crime is higher than that of other crimes, the probation is affected by the compulsory measures before trial and so on. Starting from the general theory of probation system, by comparing the Chinese and foreign probation systems, this paper deeply analyzes the present situation of the probation system in our country, the execution procedure of the probation system, and the inspection system of the probation test period. The author puts forward some theoretical suggestions on the execution of community correction in the probation system, such as setting up the suspended sentence of the crime against the minor offender, increasing the judgment of personal condition, adding the provisions about the burden of probation and the instruction of probation; Construct probation hearing procedure; perfect probation revocation procedure; perfect probation inspection subject; establish information management system of community prisoners.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.13

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 司法部社區(qū)矯正制度研究課題組;改革和完善我國社區(qū)矯正制度之研究(下)[J];中國司法;2003年06期

2 王秋良,李澤龍;緩刑適用的立法完善[J];法學(xué);1996年04期

3 王偉;;緩刑制度的實踐與思考[J];河北法學(xué);2006年07期

4 李嘉;徐碧雪;;試析《刑法修正案(八)》新緩刑制度[J];河北法學(xué);2012年07期

5 呂偉;;論我國社區(qū)矯正制度的確立——以《中華人民共和國刑法修正案(八)》為觀照[J];時代法學(xué);2011年05期

6 姜愛東;;社區(qū)矯正及其在我國的最新進展[J];中國檢察官;2011年17期

7 閔永明,孫衛(wèi)華,張元再;緩刑制度比較研究[J];南京師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1999年02期

8 曾惠成,趙明開;緩刑聽證初探[J];韶關(guān)學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年01期

9 邱興隆;報應(yīng)刑的價值悖論——以社會秩序、正義與個人自由為視角[J];政法論壇;2001年02期

10 鮑遂獻;;論緩刑的適用[J];中國法學(xué);1992年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 馮全;中國緩刑制度研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：2147139