本文選題：醉駕入刑 + 醉酒駕車行為��； 參考：《河南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)和人們生活水平的穩(wěn)步增長(zhǎng)，，越來(lái)越多的人們開始步入有車一族，然而，伴隨而來(lái)的醉酒駕駛事故也層出不窮，給人們的生命健康與財(cái)產(chǎn)安全造成極大威。于是，我國(guó)為嚴(yán)懲醉酒駕駛行為，在2011年5月1日正式實(shí)施了《刑法修正案（八）》，隨后又修改了《道路交通安全法》，把醉酒駕駛行為歸入到危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪中。至此以后，醉酒駕駛行為便正式入刑。“醉駕”的入刑對(duì)于規(guī)制醉酒駕駛行為確實(shí)起到了很好的效果，但是，一項(xiàng)新罪名的增加，經(jīng)過時(shí)間與實(shí)踐的考驗(yàn)，難免會(huì)出現(xiàn)許多問。因此，本文主要基于探討與反思“醉駕”入刑以來(lái)所出現(xiàn)的問題，進(jìn)而提出相關(guān)的規(guī)范方法與建議。 正文共分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分首先概述了我國(guó)關(guān)于“醉駕”入刑的相關(guān)法律法規(guī)以及危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪的概念與犯罪構(gòu)成，其中先通過解讀《刑法修正案八》、《道路交通安全法》以及我國(guó)關(guān)于“醉駕”的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)這三個(gè)方面，進(jìn)而再分析危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪的概念與犯罪構(gòu)成，以期能更好的了解我國(guó)關(guān)于“醉駕”入刑的具體法律規(guī)定與依據(jù)，從而為下文的論述打好基礎(chǔ)。 第二部分主要通過了解與對(duì)比國(guó)外，主要是大陸法系一些國(guó)家以及英美法系的一些國(guó)家，在關(guān)于醉酒駕駛行為方面的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定，同時(shí)結(jié)合不同的文化風(fēng)俗與具體國(guó)情，反思我國(guó)在規(guī)制醉酒駕駛行為相關(guān)法律法規(guī)上的不足，從而為下文的完善方法與建議提供參考與借鑒。 第三部分主要從兩個(gè)方面對(duì)我國(guó)“醉駕”入刑以來(lái)所引起的爭(zhēng)議與問題進(jìn)行反思，一個(gè)方面是從我國(guó)“醉駕”入刑的理論性爭(zhēng)議開始反思，主要涉及刑法的謙抑性，刑法總則第13條，以及罪刑法定原則，并對(duì)我國(guó)“醉駕”入刑以及“醉駕”入刑以來(lái)的幾乎“一律”入刑的合理性進(jìn)行反思。另一個(gè)方面從我國(guó)“醉駕”入刑以來(lái)在司法實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的問題進(jìn)行反思，其切入點(diǎn)主要從定罪量刑不均衡，行政法的被架空，司法資源的浪費(fèi)以及難以實(shí)現(xiàn)正義最大化這四個(gè)方面來(lái)探討。通過對(duì)這兩大方面的反思與探討提出問題，也為隨后下文引出針對(duì)解決這些問題的相關(guān)規(guī)范方法與建議做好鋪墊。 最后一部分主要是針對(duì)上文反思的爭(zhēng)議與問題以及參考借鑒國(guó)外相關(guān)法律，同時(shí)因地制宜，客觀考慮我國(guó)國(guó)情，分別從呼吁盡快出臺(tái)相關(guān)司法解釋與規(guī)范性文件以及完善相關(guān)刑法與行政法的銜接制度這三個(gè)方面提出的一些規(guī)范方法與建議，從而使我國(guó)關(guān)于醉酒駕駛的法律規(guī)制更合理、更成熟。
[Abstract]:With the steady growth of our country's economy and people's living standard, more and more people begin to enter the family with cars. However, the drunken driving accidents come in endlessly, which brings great threat to people's health and property safety. Therefore, in order to severely punish drunken driving, China formally implemented the Criminal Law Amendment (8) on May 1, 2011, and then amended the Road Traffic Safety Law to classify drunken driving into the crime of dangerous driving. After this point, drunken driving behavior will be formally punished. The penalty of "drunk driving" does play a very good role in regulating drunken driving behavior. However, the increase of a new charge, after the test of time and practice, will inevitably lead to many questions. Therefore, this article mainly based on the discussion and reflection "drunk driving" since the criminal problems, and then put forward the relevant normative methods and suggestions. The text is divided into four parts: The first part summarizes the related laws and regulations of "drunk driving" and the concept and constitution of dangerous driving crime in our country. First of all, through the interpretation of "Criminal Law Amendment 8", "Road Traffic Safety Law" and the identification standard of "drunk driving" in China, the concept and composition of the crime of dangerous driving are analyzed. In order to better understand our country about the "drunk driving" into the criminal law provisions and basis, so as to lay a good foundation for the following discussion. The second part mainly through the understanding and comparison of foreign countries, mainly some countries in the continental law system and some countries in the Anglo-American legal system, in the drunken driving behavior related laws and regulations, while combining different cultural customs and specific national conditions. In order to provide reference and reference for the following perfect methods and suggestions, this paper reflects on the shortcomings of the laws and regulations related to the regulation of drunken driving in China. The third part mainly reflects on the disputes and problems caused by "drunk driving" from two aspects, one is from the theoretical controversy of "drunk driving" into criminal law, mainly involving the modesty of criminal law. Article 13 of the general principles of criminal law, as well as the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime, reflects on the rationality of "drunk driving" in criminal law and almost "uniform" in criminal law since "drunk driving" in our country. Another aspect reflects on the problems that appear in the judicial practice since the "drunk driving" in our country. The breakthrough point is mainly from the imbalance of conviction and sentencing, the overhead of administrative law. This paper discusses the waste of judicial resources and the difficulty of maximizing justice. Through the introspection and discussion of these two aspects, this paper puts forward some questions, which also pave the way for the following to draw out the relevant standard methods and suggestions to solve these problems. The last part is mainly aimed at the disputes and problems reflected above, as well as referring to the relevant laws of foreign countries, and at the same time taking measures according to local conditions and objectively considering the national conditions of our country. Respectively from the appeal to issue the relevant judicial interpretation and normative documents as soon as possible as well as improve the connection system of criminal law and administrative law these three aspects put forward some normative methods and suggestions so as to make the legal regulation of drunken driving more reasonable in our country. More mature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 陳衛(wèi)山;;河北邢臺(tái)地區(qū)醉酒駕駛案件調(diào)查報(bào)告[J];湖北函授大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期

本文編號(hào)：1942478