本文選題：非財產性利益 + 賄賂　； 參考：《大連海事大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：權錢交易、官商勾結歷來是我國黨風廉政重點打擊的對象,為了獲取不正當利益,很多個人或集體通過賄賂高官達到目的的情形不在少數(shù),當然與此同時,有關國家司法機關必然會對此種行為進行嚴厲的查處。正因如此,為了規(guī)避法律的制裁,很多更為隱蔽的賄賂方式便營運而生,這些賄賂方式最顯著的共同特征就是在表面看來不具有財產性利益的屬性,實際上則有著更大的危害,因為財產性利益是“錢權”的直接交易,但是加入其它種類的賄賂形式則可能對原有的正常社會秩序造成顛覆性的傷害,比如為受托人的家屬提供就業(yè)機會,損害了正常的競爭上崗的公平秩序；對受托人提供各種保密信息,無疑造成了信息的走漏；給受托人在某些著作上享有署名權則是對知識產權的濫用,可以說,非財產性利益的賄賂形式有著更大的誘惑力和更強的腐蝕性。然而,對于這種危害行為,卻找不到任何明確的法律條文加以規(guī)制,這直接導致該種賄賂形式屢禁不止。為了遏制這種不正之風,最直接的做法就是將非財產性利益賄賂納入刑法的規(guī)制范圍,使該行為“入罪”,只有如此,才能打擊有關人員的囂張氣焰,確保我國社會主義政治、經濟的正常秩序。 基于此,本文對非財產性賄賂進行了較為詳盡的闡述,本論文由四章組成： 第一章是理論分析,主要從理論層面探討了賄賂的概念和特征,以及非財產性利益賄賂的各種分類,并且介紹了理論界對非財產性賄賂能否入罪的不同觀點； 第二章通過多角度的分析,得出非財產性利益賄賂法定化的可行性以及必要性,主要從法理基礎、司法實踐需要、以及國內外經驗等幾方面展開論述； 第三章則是從傳統(tǒng)和現(xiàn)實等角度深入剖析了在我國將非財產性利益賄賂納入刑法規(guī)制范圍可能遇到的障礙,主要包括傳統(tǒng)文化認同方面、司法實踐中證據(jù)收集方面,以及量刑等方面的障礙； 最后,結合我國的實際情況和現(xiàn)存問題,提出非財產性利益賄賂入罪的幾點具體建議和對策,不僅包括立法層面的建議,也包括針對司法實踐中可能遇到的實際障礙所提出的對策建議。
[Abstract]:Trade in power and money, collusion between government and business has always been the focus of our party's work and clean government. In order to obtain improper benefits, many individuals or groups have been bribing senior officials to achieve their goals, but at the same time, of course, The judicial organs of the countries concerned will certainly carry out strict investigation and punishment of such acts. That is why, in order to circumvent legal sanctions, many more covert forms of bribery have come into operation. The most significant common feature of these forms of bribery is that they do not appear to have the attributes of property interests, but in fact they are even more harmful. Because property interests are direct transactions of "money rights," but adding other forms of bribery may cause subversive harm to the original normal social order, such as providing employment opportunities for the trustees' families. It has damaged the fair order of normal competition and employment; the provision of all kinds of confidential information to the trustees has undoubtedly resulted in the leakage of information; giving the trustees the right of signature in certain works is an abuse of intellectual property rights, and it can be said that, The form of non-pecuniary interest bribery has more allure and stronger corrosiveness. However, there are no clear legal provisions to regulate this kind of harmful behavior, which directly leads to the repeated prohibition of this form of bribery. In order to curb this unhealthy trend, the most direct way is to bring non-property interests and bribery into the scope of the criminal law to "criminalize" the act. Only in this way can we crack down on the arrogance of the personnel concerned and ensure socialist politics in our country. A normal economic order. Based on this, this paper has carried on the more detailed elaboration to the non-property bribery, this paper is composed of four chapters: The first chapter is the theoretical analysis, mainly discusses the concept and characteristics of bribery from the theoretical level, as well as the various categories of non-property interest bribery, and introduces the different views of the theoretical circle on whether non-property bribery can be criminalized; The second chapter through the multi-angle analysis, draws the non-property benefit bribery legalization feasibility and the necessity, mainly from the legal theory foundation, the judicial practice need, as well as the domestic and foreign experience and so on several aspects carries on the elaboration; The third chapter is from the perspective of tradition and reality in-depth analysis of the non-property interests bribery into the scope of criminal law may encounter obstacles, including the traditional cultural identity, judicial practice in the collection of evidence. And the obstacles of sentencing; Finally, combined with the actual situation and existing problems in our country, this paper puts forward several specific suggestions and countermeasures for the criminalization of non-property interests bribery, including not only the legislative proposals, It also includes countermeasures and suggestions for practical obstacles that may be encountered in judicial practice.
【學位授予單位】：大連海事大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.392

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 馬衛(wèi)軍;;論搶劫罪中的財產性利益[J];政治與法律;2011年07期

2 黃榮康;;淺析賄賂的內容[J];法律學習與研究;1990年01期

3 張紹謙;鄭列;;“財產性利益”型賄賂相關問題探討[J];法學;2009年03期

4 張昱泉;;淺談賄賂的內容[J];山西省政法管理干部學院學報;2012年01期

5 張紅昌;;搶劫罪中的財產性利益探究[J];中國刑事法雜志;2012年07期

6 陳燁;李森;;論刑法中的財產性利益[J];中國刑事法雜志;2012年11期

7 謝怡;;財產性利益能否成為搶劫的對象[J];湖北警官學院學報;2012年11期

8 竇俊杰;;非財產性利益賄賂的幾點思考[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年09期

9 郭希西;;淺談非財產性利益賄賂[J];經濟研究導刊;2013年27期

10 陳燁;;財產性利益與罪刑法定問題[J];上海交通大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2013年05期

相關重要報紙文章 前10條

1 北京市朝陽區(qū)檢察院、中國人民大學法學院 黃福濤邋關振海;財產性利益可以成為搶劫罪對象[N];檢察日報;2008年

2 河北大學政法學院教授 孟慶華;商業(yè)賄賂中的“財產性利益”[N];中國紀檢監(jiān)察報;2010年

3 彭之宇;賄賂范圍應包括非財產性利益[N];檢察日報;2006年

4 桑育春;商業(yè)賄賂范圍不應僅限于財物[N];江蘇經濟報;2007年

5 最高人民法院副院長 熊選國;關于“賄賂”范圍的再思考[N];人民法院報;2007年

6 李耀勤　楊濤亮;認定賄賂犯罪對象宜持“財產性利益說”[N];江蘇法制報;2009年

7 趙寶成 陳克偉;受賄罪對象不應包括非財產性利益[N];檢察日報;2004年

8 本報記者 王光平;商業(yè)賄賂范圍擴大至財產性利益[N];中國證券報;2008年

9 陳定民 嚴慧;建議將賄賂的內容由“財物”修改為“不正當好處”[N];人民法院報;2006年

10 江蘇省如東縣人民檢察院 繆軍;財產性利益也應成為敲詐勒索的犯罪對象[N];檢察日報;2013年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 秦好歡;財產性利益的刑法保護問題研究[D];遼寧大學;2013年

2 王sッ，

本文編號：1942075