本文選題：監(jiān)督過失理論 + 玩忽職守罪��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：司法實踐中,玩忽職守罪的責(zé)任人員追究呈現(xiàn)出低層化和直接化特點,尤其是“職位越高、離現(xiàn)場越遠(yuǎn),責(zé)任追究越難”的現(xiàn)象特別嚴(yán)重,使得我國刑法設(shè)置這一職務(wù)犯罪的目的和功能沒有很好地發(fā)揮出來。監(jiān)督過失理論是關(guān)于追究監(jiān)督者責(zé)任的理論,對玩忽職守罪的責(zé)任人員追究具有指導(dǎo)意義和參考價值。本文將監(jiān)督過失理論運用于玩忽職守罪的責(zé)任人員追究,尤其是對具有監(jiān)督職能的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者因監(jiān)督過失行為間接導(dǎo)致危害結(jié)果發(fā)生的追究其責(zé)任,以彌補司法實踐中玩忽職守罪的責(zé)任人員追究所存在的不足和缺陷,更好地實現(xiàn)刑法規(guī)定玩忽職守罪的目的和功能。本文第一部分以真實案例引出監(jiān)督過失理論在玩忽職守罪中的司法應(yīng)用問題。第二部分分析了監(jiān)督過失理論的司法應(yīng)用要件。其中:主體要件包括身份屬性條件、職責(zé)屬性條件,以及辨認(rèn)和控制能力條件;主觀要件是指注意義務(wù)的過失,包括忽大意過失和過于自信過失;客觀要件包括作為和不作為、間接因果關(guān)系等。第三部分闡述了監(jiān)督過失理論應(yīng)用于玩忽職守罪的必要性和可行性。主要理由是:我國刑法尚不具備單獨設(shè)立監(jiān)督過失罪的條件,而司法實踐中對玩忽職守行為的規(guī)制又存在嚴(yán)重不足和缺陷;監(jiān)督過失理論的應(yīng)用要件與玩忽職守罪的適用要件具有相似性、互補性。第四部分論述了監(jiān)督過失理論在玩忽職守罪中的具體應(yīng)用方式。主要包括監(jiān)督過失理論的主體要件、主觀要件、客觀要件在玩忽職守罪中的應(yīng)用方式,還分析了監(jiān)督過失理論在玩忽職守罪應(yīng)用中應(yīng)當(dāng)受到的限制。最后是結(jié)語部分,提出了完善我國關(guān)于監(jiān)督過失的立法建議。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, the investigation of personnel responsible for the crime of dereliction of duty shows the characteristics of low-level and directness, especially the phenomenon of "the higher the position, the farther away from the scene, the more difficult it is to be held accountable." The purpose and function of setting up this duty crime in criminal law of our country has not been brought into full play. The theory of supervisory negligence is the theory of investigating the supervisor's responsibility, which has guiding significance and reference value for the investigation of the person responsible for the crime of dereliction of duty. In this paper, the theory of supervisory negligence is applied to the investigation of persons responsible for the crime of neglect of duty, especially for the leaders with supervisory functions who are held responsible for the harm caused indirectly by the negligence of supervision. In order to make up for the deficiency and defect of the person responsible for the crime of dereliction of duty in judicial practice, the purpose and function of the crime of dereliction of duty stipulated in the criminal law can be better realized. The first part of this paper leads to the judicial application of the theory of supervisory negligence in the crime of dereliction of duty with real cases. The second part analyzes the elements of judicial application of supervisory negligence theory. Among them: the subjective elements include the condition of identity attribute, the condition of responsibility attribute, and the condition of identification and control ability; the subjective element refers to the negligence of duty of care, including negligence and overconfidence; the objective element includes act and omission. Indirect causality, etc. The third part expounds the necessity and feasibility of applying the theory of supervisory negligence to the crime of dereliction of duty. The main reasons are: the criminal law of our country does not have the condition of establishing the supervision of misdemeanor separately, and the regulation of dereliction of duty in the judicial practice has serious deficiency and defect; The application elements of the supervisory negligence theory and the applicable elements of the crime of dereliction of duty are similar and complementary. The fourth part discusses the specific application of the theory of oversight negligence in the crime of neglect of duty. It mainly includes the main elements of supervision negligence theory, subjective elements, objective elements in the application of the crime of dereliction of duty, but also analyzes the supervision of negligence theory in the application of the crime of dereliction of duty should be limited. The last part is the conclusion, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the legislation of supervision fault in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.393

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 黃芳;;基層檢察室法律監(jiān)督職能的多維度探析[J];法制與社會;2014年06期

2 江里程;;完善制約監(jiān)督機制 嚴(yán)格規(guī)范權(quán)力行使[J];唯實;2014年02期

3 王克先;;行政機關(guān)工作人員職責(zé)之確定[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(上旬);2012年08期

4 馮軍;;刑法中的責(zé)任原則 兼與張明楷教授商榷[J];中外法學(xué);2012年01期

5 王鵬祥;劉林霞;;公務(wù)監(jiān)督過失犯罪及其對策研究[J];周口師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年03期

6 錢葉六;;監(jiān)督過失理論及其適用[J];法學(xué)論壇;2010年03期

7 易益典;;論監(jiān)督過失理論的刑法適用[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年01期

8 廖道明;劉正才;;履行職務(wù)程序已到位是否屬于玩忽職守[J];中國檢察官;2007年02期

9 韓玉勝;沈玉忠;;監(jiān)督過失論略[J];法學(xué)論壇;2007年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條

1 齊云飛;監(jiān)督過失的注意義務(wù)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

2 李坤;玩忽職守罪的司法認(rèn)定[D];安徽大學(xué);2012年

3 馮卉;論監(jiān)督過失的刑事責(zé)任[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

4 陳哲;論監(jiān)督過失理論在我國瀆職犯罪中的運用[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

5 鄭春林;瀆職犯罪法律適用中的幾個疑難問題[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

6 單瑩;玩忽職守型瀆職犯罪若干問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

7 陳軍;監(jiān)督管理過失犯罪研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

8 方宏全;玩忽職守罪的犯罪構(gòu)成及相關(guān)問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

9 李祖華;玩忽職守罪若干問題研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2002年

，

本文編號：1937698