本文選題：行為無價(jià)值 + 結(jié)果無價(jià)值　； 參考：《上海師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文從行為無價(jià)值論和結(jié)果無價(jià)值論的分歧入手主耍討論了..元行為無價(jià)值論的積極意義。本文分為六大部分。第一部分是緒論。第二部分是介紹行為無價(jià)值論和結(jié)果無價(jià)值論的概念和法展脈絡(luò)：行為無價(jià)值論，也可稱為人的違法論（或人的不法論）。單純從違法的角度而言，，行為無價(jià)值的核心觀點(diǎn)是，在考察是否存在實(shí)質(zhì)的違法性時(shí)，重視行為人的意思這種“人的”要素。其中，完全不考慮法益侵害及其危險(xiǎn)，僅將行為人的‘‘意思”作為違法性判斷基礎(chǔ)的立場(chǎng)，可謂“一元的人的違法論”或者“主觀的一元的行為無價(jià)值論”；不僅將行為人的“意思”，而且將法益侵害及其危險(xiǎn)也作為違法性判斷基礎(chǔ)的立場(chǎng)，可謂：元的違法論”或者‘‘：：元行為無價(jià)值論”。第三部分，從犯罪構(gòu)成理論的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)來說明二元行為無價(jià)值論更符合現(xiàn)代犯罪構(gòu)成理論的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)及主觀要素成為犯罪構(gòu)成要件成為主流。第四部分，從犯罪構(gòu)成要件角度來探究.：元行為無價(jià)值論。分為客觀要素和主觀要素兩部分內(nèi)容，客觀要素方面主要介紹了行為、結(jié)果和因果關(guān)系。主觀要素方面主要包含了故意和過失兩部分內(nèi)容。第五部分，主要介紹用二元行為無價(jià)值論更有利于違法性判斷。犯罪的實(shí)體是違法與責(zé)任，責(zé)任是對(duì)違法的貴任，因而不能脫離違法而存在。但是，違法的存在不依賴責(zé)任。另一方面，對(duì)違法性的理解不同必然會(huì)導(dǎo)致對(duì)責(zé)任的理解不同。行為無價(jià)值論S結(jié)果無價(jià)值論源于對(duì)違法性認(rèn)識(shí)上的分歧，那么該部分是本文的重點(diǎn)章節(jié)。本部分主要從違法性論的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)、違法性判斷中違法性的判斷資料、違法性的判斷時(shí)點(diǎn)以及二元的行為無價(jià)值對(duì)違法阻卻事由的合理性還有用二元的行為無價(jià)值的觀點(diǎn)的應(yīng)用：主要用來解釋偶然防衛(wèi)的合理性、對(duì)物的防衛(wèi)的合理性。最后一部分內(nèi)容是對(duì)未遂犯問題的研究討論，從未遂犯著手的認(rèn)定方面的合理性，到用二元的行為無價(jià)值對(duì)危險(xiǎn)的判斷來區(qū)分未遂犯與不能犯。
[Abstract]:This article starts with the difference between the theory of behavior and the theory of result without value. Meta-behavior has no positive significance of value theory. This paper is divided into six parts. The first part is the introduction. The second part is an introduction to the concept of "act without value" and "result without value" and the development of law: the theory of behavior without value can also be called "illegality" (or "illegality" of human being). From the point of view of illegality, the core point of the worthless behavior is to attach importance to the "human" element of the meaning of the perpetrator when examining the existence of substantive illegality. Among them, completely do not consider the legal interest infringement and its danger, only regard the actor's' meaning "as the illegal judgment basis, can be described as" the person's illegality theory "or" the subjective monistic behavior has no value theory "; Not only the "meaning" of the doer, but also the legal interest infringement and its danger are taken as the basis of the judgment of illegality, which can be described as "Yuan's illegality" or ": there is no value of meta-behavior. In the third part, from the development trend of the theory of crime constitution, it is shown that the theory of dualistic behavior without value is more in line with the development trend of modern theory of constitution of crime and that the subjective elements become the mainstream of the constitutive elements of crime. The fourth part, from the point of view of the elements of crime, to explore the meta-behavior without value. It is divided into two parts: objective elements and subjective elements. Objective elements mainly introduce behavior, result and causality. Subjective elements mainly include intentional and negligent content. In the fifth part, the author mainly introduces that it is more advantageous to judge illegality by using dualistic theory of non-value. The entity of crime is illegal and responsible, and responsibility is the duty of illegality, so it cannot exist without breaking the law. However, the existence of violations does not depend on responsibility. On the other hand, different understanding of illegality will inevitably lead to different understanding of responsibility. The behavioral nonaxiology S result nonaxiology originates from the difference on the understanding of illegality, so this part is the key chapter of this paper. This part is mainly based on the philosophical basis of illegality theory, the judgment data of illegality in illegality judgment, The judgment of illegality and the reasonableness of dualistic behavior to the reason of obstruction of law, and the application of the viewpoint that dualistic behavior is worthless: mainly used to explain the rationality of accidental defense and the reasonableness of material defense. The last part is the research and discussion on the problem of attempted crime, from the rationality of the identification of attempted crime to the judgment of danger by dualistic behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D914

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 黎宏;行為無價(jià)值論與結(jié)果無價(jià)值論:現(xiàn)狀和展望[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年06期

2 周光權(quán);;行為無價(jià)值論的法益觀[J];中外法學(xué);2011年05期

3 黎宏;;行為無價(jià)值論批判[J];中國法學(xué);2006年02期

4 張明楷;;行為功利主義違法觀[J];中國法學(xué);2011年05期

5 周光權(quán);;新行為無價(jià)值論的中國展開[J];中國法學(xué);2012年01期

6 周光權(quán);;違法性判斷的基準(zhǔn)與行為無價(jià)值論——兼論當(dāng)代中國刑法學(xué)的立場(chǎng)問題[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年04期

7 張明楷;;行為無價(jià)值論的疑問——兼與周光權(quán)教授商榷[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年01期

本文編號(hào)：1934344