發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-26 00:53

  本文選題：選擇性罪名 + 罪數(shù)判斷��； 參考：《南昌大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：選擇性罪名是一種特殊的罪名,在我國(guó)罪名體系中占有重要位置。然而我國(guó)立法未對(duì)選擇性罪名作出明確規(guī)定,再加上刑法理論研究的不足,導(dǎo)致司法實(shí)踐對(duì)選擇性罪名適用不統(tǒng)一,尤其是罪數(shù)判斷問(wèn)題。本文試圖在評(píng)析選擇性罪名各罪數(shù)學(xué)說(shuō)的基礎(chǔ)上,通過(guò)對(duì)比、歸納的方法提出法益重合性是選擇性罪名罪數(shù)判斷的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。法益重合性判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是指行為所侵犯的法益是否具有重合性。行為人實(shí)施選擇性罪名中的數(shù)行為,所侵犯法益具有重合性,則只構(gòu)成一罪;反之,則構(gòu)成數(shù)罪。法益重合性判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)能夠貫徹全面評(píng)價(jià)原則和禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則,且具有可操作性。因此對(duì)統(tǒng)一司法實(shí)踐中選擇性罪名的罪數(shù)判斷具有重要意義。全文主要包括三部分,具體如下:第一部分和第二部分主要是對(duì)我國(guó)刑法學(xué)界中關(guān)于選擇性罪名罪數(shù)學(xué)說(shuō)的歸納概括及評(píng)析。刑法學(xué)界關(guān)于選擇性罪名罪數(shù)學(xué)說(shuō)的觀點(diǎn)主要有三種:一罪說(shuō)、數(shù)罪說(shuō)、折衷說(shuō)。其中,根據(jù)不同的劃分標(biāo)準(zhǔn),折衷說(shuō)可以形成三種不同的觀點(diǎn):第一,以案件是否屬于同一宗案件為標(biāo)準(zhǔn);第二,以是否符合罪刑相適應(yīng)原則為標(biāo)準(zhǔn);第三,以行為人實(shí)施的數(shù)行為之間是否存在內(nèi)在聯(lián)系性為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。本文主張折衷說(shuō),但以法益重合性為劃分標(biāo)準(zhǔn),即行為所侵害的法益是否具有重合性是行為是構(gòu)成一罪還是構(gòu)成數(shù)罪的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。第三部分是本文的核心,在分析各罪數(shù)判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)學(xué)說(shuō)的基礎(chǔ)之上提出本文認(rèn)為較為科學(xué)的新的選擇性罪名罪數(shù)判斷的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),即法益重合性判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn),并對(duì)該新的罪數(shù)判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行論證,明確法益重合性應(yīng)滿(mǎn)足的條件,最后將該判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)具體運(yùn)用到選擇性罪名中的罪數(shù)判斷中,歸納出行為人實(shí)施選擇性罪名中的行為構(gòu)成一罪情形與數(shù)罪情形。
[Abstract]:Selective charge is a special charge, which plays an important role in our country's crime system. However, the legislation of our country has not made a clear stipulation on the selective charge, coupled with the insufficiency of the study of the theory of criminal law, which leads to the disunity of the judicial practice in the application of the selective charge, especially the problem of judging the number of the crimes. On the basis of analyzing the mathematical theory of each crime of selective charge, this paper proposes that the coincidence of legal interests is the criterion of judging the number of crimes of selective charge by means of comparison and induction. The criterion of law benefit coincidence is whether the law interest violated by the act has coincidence. When the actor carries out several acts in the selective charge, the infringed legal interest is superimposed, which constitutes only one crime; otherwise, it constitutes a number of crimes. The criterion of coincidence of law benefit can carry out the principle of comprehensive evaluation and prohibition of repeated evaluation, and it is operable. Therefore, it is of great significance to judge the number of selective charges in unified judicial practice. The full text mainly includes three parts, as follows: the first part and the second part are the summary and evaluation of the mathematical theory of the crime of selective charge in the criminal law circle of our country. There are three kinds of views on the mathematical theory of selective charge in criminal law field: one crime theory, several crimes theory and compromise theory. Among them, according to different criteria of division, the compromise theory can form three different views: first, whether the case belongs to the same case as the criterion; second, whether it conforms to the principle of the adaptation of crime and punishment; and thirdly, The criterion is whether the number of acts carried out by the actor is interlinked. This paper argues for compromise, but the criterion is based on the coincidence of legal interests, that is, whether the legal interest violated by an act has coincidence is the criterion of whether the act constitutes a crime or a number of crimes. The third part is the core of this paper. On the basis of analyzing the theory of the judgment standard of the number of crimes, this paper puts forward a new criterion of judging the number of crimes of selective charge, that is, the criterion of coincidence of legal interests, which is considered to be more scientific in this paper. And the new judgment standard of the number of crimes is demonstrated, and the conditions that should be satisfied by the coincidence of legal interests are made clear. Finally, the criterion is applied to the judgment of the number of crimes in the selective charge. The author concludes that the behavior constitutes a crime and several crimes in the implementation of selective charges.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉玲;選擇性罪名研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1935314