發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-16 04:28

  本文選題：快速審判權(quán) + 司法審查　； 參考：《環(huán)球法律評(píng)論》2017年03期

【摘要】：《美國憲法第六修正案》中被告人享有快速審判的權(quán)利,在美國被告人基本權(quán)利的憲法司法檢驗(yàn)中別具特點(diǎn)。這項(xiàng)權(quán)利本身的多元價(jià)值取向?qū)е旅绹?lián)邦最高法院在對該權(quán)利的憲法檢驗(yàn)過程中更具復(fù)雜性。美國聯(lián)邦最高法院在1972年的Barker案件中提出關(guān)于該權(quán)利檢驗(yàn)的雙重路徑和四要素標(biāo)準(zhǔn),為該權(quán)利的司法審查提供了基礎(chǔ)性參照標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。美國國會(huì)在1974年通過的《聯(lián)邦快速審判法案》吸收了美國聯(lián)邦法院司法判例中形成的相關(guān)規(guī)則,將該權(quán)利通過成文法的形式加以系統(tǒng)化和規(guī)范化。在美國刑事快速審判權(quán)規(guī)則的演變中,成文法與判例法都發(fā)揮了積極作用,在該權(quán)利的保護(hù)和規(guī)則形成過程中互為補(bǔ)充、互為促進(jìn)。美國快速審判權(quán)的憲法檢驗(yàn)和立法嬗變過程中的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和教訓(xùn),可為我國刑事快速審判制度的立法和創(chuàng)新提供有益的借鑒。
[Abstract]:In the sixth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, the accused enjoy the right to a speedy trial, which has special features in the constitutional judicial examination of the basic rights of the accused in the United States. The pluralistic value orientation of the right itself makes the U.S. Supreme Court more complex in its constitutional test of the right. In the 1972 Barker case, the Federal Supreme Court of the United States put forward the double path and four-element standard on the test of the right, which provided the basic reference standard for the judicial review of the right. The Federal Quick trial Act passed by the United States Congress in 1974 absorbed the relevant rules formed in the judicial jurisprudence of the United States Federal Court and systematized and standardized the right through the form of statutory law. In the evolution of the rules of criminal fast trial in the United States, both statute law and case law have played an active role in the protection of this right and the formation of the rules, which complement and promote each other. The experience and lessons in the process of constitutional examination and legislative evolution of the American rapid trial power can provide useful reference for the legislation and innovation of the criminal fast trial system in our country.
【作者單位】： 中國政法大學(xué)訴訟法學(xué)研究院;
【基金】：國家2011計(jì)劃司法文明協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心的研究成果 作者主持的2016年度中央政法委重大項(xiàng)目“國外刑事案件快速處理程序機(jī)制研究”的研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2;DD914

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 李念祖;;從中文語法言說基本權(quán)利的本義[J];清華法律評(píng)論;2012年01期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1895462