本文選題：口袋罪 + 口袋性�。� 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：“口袋罪”一直以來都被大家所詬病，是我國司法的痼疾。當(dāng)前中國的罪名“口袋化”大有舊傷不去又添新傷之勢，不僅有歷史遺留，更有新生罪名。我國《刑法》第293條規(guī)定的尋釁滋事罪源于1979年刑法中的流氓罪，是其分解罪名之一，被稱之為“小口袋罪”。近年來社會上發(fā)生的“肖傳國雇兇打方舟子案”、“溫嶺虐童案”等諸多熱點(diǎn)案件，將尋釁滋事罪的“口袋性”展現(xiàn)得淋漓盡致，故廣受爭議。由此可見流氓罪這一大“口袋罪”的分解并沒有消弭它的“口袋化”影響，分解出來的尋釁滋事罪依然“傳承其衣缽”，頗有“陰魂不散”之勢。筆者結(jié)合“口袋罪”，以分析“口袋罪”為背景，分析尋釁滋事罪的“口袋化”現(xiàn)狀，深入探討尋釁滋事罪“口袋化”的實(shí)質(zhì)問題，歸納尋釁滋事罪“口袋化”的規(guī)范路徑，并對是否廢除尋釁滋事罪上提出筆者的觀點(diǎn)。 本文共分四個(gè)章節(jié)，約3.1萬字。 第一章：主要對“口袋罪”的概念、特征、產(chǎn)生原因、危害以及我國“口袋罪”的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析。該章共分三節(jié)，第一節(jié)主要探討了“口袋罪”的概念和特征，由于學(xué)界上對“口袋罪”并沒有完整和系統(tǒng)的論述，所以并沒有統(tǒng)一的特征概括。筆者綜合諸多觀點(diǎn)，認(rèn)為“口袋罪”主要具有如下特征：首先，罪狀表述模糊，，包容量太廣；其次，罪名易交叉，不易與其他罪名區(qū)分；最后，司法適用隨意性大，罪刑不均。第二節(jié)主要分析了“口袋罪”的產(chǎn)生原因、背景和危害，以期對后面如何規(guī)范“口袋罪”作參考。第三節(jié)主要是對我國現(xiàn)行“口袋罪”的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析。 第二章：主要論述了尋釁滋事罪的“口袋化”，對尋釁滋事罪的概念辨析、歷史沿革、立法根基探源等問題進(jìn)行分析，進(jìn)而在此基礎(chǔ)上分析研究尋釁滋事罪的“口袋化”現(xiàn)狀和原因。 第三章：本章在上述對“口袋罪”和尋釁滋事罪“口袋化”論述的前提下，著重探討了“口袋罪”和尋釁滋事罪“口袋化”的規(guī)范路徑，并對尋釁滋事罪的部分構(gòu)成要素，主要是對尋釁滋事罪的犯罪動機(jī)與客觀行為的“交叉”進(jìn)行論述。 第四章：主要是對尋釁滋事罪是否應(yīng)該廢除進(jìn)行論述。筆者在闡述了理論上的存廢之爭與尋釁滋事罪的存在價(jià)值基礎(chǔ)上，認(rèn)為去罪化是尋釁滋事罪的最終道路選擇。應(yīng)該在堅(jiān)持罪刑法定原則的前提下廢除尋釁滋事罪，并且通過分解尋釁滋事罪的四種行為方式，歸納到刑法分則中的其他罪名或者行政處罰等相對弱化的方式來處理。
[Abstract]:Pocket crime has always been criticized by everyone and is the chronic malady of our country's judicature. The current Chinese charge "pocket" has the tendency of not only old injury but also new injury, not only history, but also new charge. The crime of provoking and causing trouble as stipulated in Article 293 of the Criminal Law of China originates from the crime of hooliganism in the Criminal Law of 1979, which is one of the charges of its decomposition and is called the crime of "small pocket". In recent years, many hot cases, such as Xiao Chuanguo's case of hiring criminals to beat Fang Zhouzi and Wenling's case of child abuse, have revealed the "pocket nature" of the crime of provocation and trouble, so it has been widely debated. Thus it can be seen that the decomposition of hooliganism does not eliminate its "pocket" influence. Combined with "pocket crime", the author analyzes the "pocket crime" as the background, analyzes the present situation of "pocket" in the crime of provoking and causing trouble, probes into the essential problem of "pocket" in the crime of provoking and causing trouble, and sums up the normative path of "pocket" for the crime of "provoking and causing trouble". And whether or not to abolish the crime of provoking trouble put forward the author's point of view. This article is divided into four chapters, about 31000 words. The first chapter analyzes the concept, characteristics, causes, harm and present situation of "pocket crime" in China. This chapter is divided into three sections. The first section mainly discusses the concept and characteristics of "pocket crime". Because there is no complete and systematic discussion on "pocket crime" in academic circles, there is no unified characteristic summary. The author synthesizes many viewpoints, thinks that "pocket crime" has the following characteristics: first, the description of the crime is vague, the tolerance is too wide; secondly, the charge is easy to cross, not easy to distinguish from other charges; finally, the judicial application is arbitrary, and the punishment is uneven. The second section mainly analyzes the reason, background and harm of "pocket crime" in order to make reference to how to regulate "pocket crime". The third section mainly analyzes the current situation of pocket crime in our country. The second chapter mainly discusses the "pocket" of the crime of provoking and causing trouble, analyzes the concept of the crime of finding and causing trouble, the history of the crime, the source of the legislative foundation, and so on. On the basis of this, the paper analyzes the present situation and reasons of "pocket" of the crime of provoking and causing trouble. Chapter three: on the premise of the above discussion of "pocket crime" and "pocketization", this chapter focuses on the normative path of "pocket crime" and "pocket crime", and part of the constituent elements of the crime of provoking and causing trouble. It mainly discusses the intersection between the criminal motive and objective behavior of the crime of provoking and causing trouble. Chapter four: mainly discusses whether the crime of provoking and causing trouble should be abolished. On the basis of expounding the existence value of the argument of saving and abolishing in theory and the crime of provoking and causing trouble, the author thinks that decriminalization is the ultimate choice of the crime of provoking and causing trouble. We should abolish the crime of provoking and causing trouble under the premise of adhering to the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime, and deal with it by decomposing the four ways of behavior of the crime of seeking provocation and causing trouble, and summing up the other charges or administrative penalties in the special provisions of the criminal law as relatively weak ways to deal with them.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 竺效;論部門法之法律目的[J];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2002年04期

2 李永升;談我國刑法中四“口袋罪”的修改[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1991年06期

3 陳澤憲;非法經(jīng)營罪若干問題研究[J];人民檢察;2000年02期

4 孫萬懷;;以危險(xiǎn)方法危害公共安全罪何以成為口袋罪[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2010年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張維;尋釁滋事罪問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

本文編號：1851389