本文選題：詐騙罪 + 處分行為��； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：詐騙罪是司法實(shí)踐中一種較為常見、多發(fā)的侵犯財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪類型。近幾年來，隨著網(wǎng)上交易的日益風(fēng)靡，出現(xiàn)了一些詐騙犯罪的新形式，如利用網(wǎng)絡(luò)、電話引發(fā)的各類詐騙案件：“網(wǎng)上交友騙錢案”、“短信中獎(jiǎng)詐騙案”以及“網(wǎng)購紅包詐騙案”等。司法實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)了諸如與傳統(tǒng)詐騙罪理論不符的案件以及在具體案件中詐騙罪與盜竊罪的定罪爭議等問題。所以我國的刑法理論需要與時(shí)俱進(jìn)，對現(xiàn)有的理論進(jìn)一步的完善，為司法實(shí)踐提供支持。 本文主要從被害人的視角來詳細(xì)論證詐騙罪中財(cái)產(chǎn)處分行為的幾個(gè)方面，借鑒了許多前輩的研究成果，構(gòu)建了自己知識框架。本文中主要運(yùn)用對比分析和辯證分析的方法以及案例分析法，使文章觀點(diǎn)更加具有合理性。 關(guān)于財(cái)產(chǎn)處分行為，筆者主要從財(cái)產(chǎn)處分行為的主體（處分權(quán)能）、主觀因素（處分意識的內(nèi)涵）、客觀因素（處分行為的表現(xiàn)形式）三方面來詳細(xì)論證。財(cái)產(chǎn)處分行為作為詐騙罪既遂的必備條件之一，是連接欺騙行為與財(cái)產(chǎn)損失的一個(gè)橋梁，在詐騙罪中處于核心位置，其存在有著重要意義。 首先，研究財(cái)產(chǎn)處分行為的主體范圍與資格，主要是探討處分行為的適格主體。只要具備正常辨別事情、處分財(cái)產(chǎn)能力的人，就可以處分財(cái)產(chǎn)。另外論證了機(jī)器能夠成為詐騙罪中財(cái)產(chǎn)處分行為的主體，其理論依據(jù)是機(jī)器通過預(yù)先設(shè)定的程序表達(dá)人的意愿，機(jī)器作為擬制的人，處分財(cái)物。法人能夠成為財(cái)產(chǎn)處分行為的主體，作出財(cái)產(chǎn)處分行為。另外具體分析詐騙行為無論發(fā)生在兩方之間、還是三方詐騙（三角詐騙），處分人應(yīng)該具備處分財(cái)產(chǎn)的權(quán)限與地位。 其次，詳細(xì)介紹了處分行為的主觀因素--處分意識，處分意識的內(nèi)涵是處分者認(rèn)識到自己是將把某種具體財(cái)物或者財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益轉(zhuǎn)移給他人占有,并根據(jù)自己內(nèi)心意愿自由地做出此種決定，不受其他因素的干擾（例如者脅迫）。處分意識包含認(rèn)識因素和意志因素，處分意識的認(rèn)識因素體現(xiàn)了處分人對于轉(zhuǎn)移給他人的財(cái)物和財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益的認(rèn)識程度，對財(cái)物的數(shù)量、價(jià)格、質(zhì)量、種類不需要有清晰、準(zhǔn)確無誤的認(rèn)識，只要認(rèn)識到轉(zhuǎn)移對象，就存在處分意識。并具體分析對處分對象認(rèn)識程度的不同，是如何影響處分意識是否存在。意志因素為處分人處分財(cái)產(chǎn)時(shí)的心理狀態(tài)，能夠自主地決定處分對象、方式、時(shí)間、地點(diǎn)等。 然后，，主要分析了財(cái)產(chǎn)處分行為的客觀因素   處分行為，關(guān)于處分行為的內(nèi)涵，筆者同意占有轉(zhuǎn)移說，只要轉(zhuǎn)移占有就完成了處分行為。判斷依據(jù)是客觀上行為人能夠自由支配處分人所交付的財(cái)物或者財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益，而處分人失去了對財(cái)物的控制。具體分析了幾種處分行為，交付、毀壞和拋棄、以及債權(quán)債務(wù)的處分，如何影響處分行為認(rèn)定、詐騙罪成立。 最后，結(jié)合現(xiàn)實(shí)案例，具體分析了財(cái)產(chǎn)處分行為在司法實(shí)踐中重要作用，總結(jié)前幾部分的理論，前后呼應(yīng)。處分行為是如何在盜竊罪與詐騙罪之間畫出一條清晰的界限。論文中，根據(jù)需要穿插各種案例，分析了財(cái)產(chǎn)處分行為是如何影響詐騙罪的既遂與未遂、詐騙罪與盜竊罪、詐騙罪與敲詐勒索罪、詐騙罪與故意毀壞財(cái)物罪之間的界限。希望能夠有助于我們更好地認(rèn)定詐騙罪中的財(cái)產(chǎn)處分行為，將符合該屬性的行為以現(xiàn)有的詐騙罪條款進(jìn)行評價(jià)。
[Abstract]:Crime of fraud is a more common and multiple type of crime of property crime in judicial practice . In recent years , with the popularity of online trading , there have been some new forms of fraud crime , such as the use of network , telephone - initiated various kinds of fraud cases : " online dating fraud case " , " short message winning fraud case " and " online shopping bag fraud case " etc . The criminal law theory of our country needs to be perfected with the times , further consummation of the existing theory , and provide support for judicial practice .

This paper mainly discusses several aspects of the disposition of the property in the crime of fraud from the perspective of victim , and draws on the research results of many predecessors and constructs his own knowledge frame . This paper mainly applies the method of comparative analysis and dialectical analysis and the case analysis method to make the article more reasonable .

With regard to the disposition of property , the author gives a detailed demonstration from three aspects of the subject ( power of disposition ) , subjective factor ( the connotation of disposition consciousness ) and objective factor ( the form of disposition ) of the disposition of property . The property disposition act as one of the necessary conditions of the crime of fraud is a bridge between deception behavior and property loss , which is in the core position in the crime of fraud .

Firstly , the scope and qualification of the disposition of property is studied , which mainly discusses the subject of disposition . As long as there is normal discrimination , the person who disposes the property can dispose of the property . The theory basis is that the machine can be the subject of the disposition of the property by means of the pre - established procedure . The legal person can be the subject of the action of disposition of property and dispose the property .

Secondly , it introduces the subjective factors of disciplinary action - -disciplinary consciousness , the connotation of disposition consciousness is that the punishment person realizes that he will transfer some specific property or property interests to others , and make such decision freely according to his inner will .

鐒跺悗,涓昏鍒嗘瀽浜嗚儲浜у鍒嗚涓虹殑瀹㈣鍥犵礌   澶勫垎琛屼負(fù),鍏充簬澶勫垎琛屼負(fù)鐨勫唴娑

本文編號：1851344