本文選題：刑法 + 私法化　； 參考：《河北大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：長(zhǎng)期以來，主流觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為刑法是公法，然而刑法的補(bǔ)充性決定了刑法只能是保障法。隨著理論與實(shí)踐的發(fā)展，刑法逐漸出現(xiàn)私法化的傾向，其典型標(biāo)志就是刑事和解制度的出現(xiàn)。刑事和解作為一種新生事物，具有糾紛解決的靈活性、自治性、實(shí)質(zhì)性、長(zhǎng)久性等特征，與傳統(tǒng)糾紛解決方式截然不同；而且，刑事和解具有公正、效益的積極價(jià)值，能夠更好地體現(xiàn)被害人的利益，提高訴訟效率，化解社會(huì)矛盾，但也有一定的消極影響。作為刑法私法化表現(xiàn)之一的被害人同意，僅指以沒有被害人的承諾即以違反被害人的意思為構(gòu)成要件內(nèi)容的犯罪。被害人同意理論對(duì)刑法學(xué)特別是對(duì)犯罪論具有重要影響。另外，刑事責(zé)任實(shí)現(xiàn)方式的轉(zhuǎn)變也是刑法私法化的表現(xiàn)之一。隨著刑事法治的發(fā)展，輕刑罰化、非刑罰化逐漸取代傳統(tǒng)的重刑主義占據(jù)主流地位，符合人道主義理念和國(guó)際潮流趨勢(shì)。刑法私法化有著多方面的原因。其中，構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)、維護(hù)社會(huì)穩(wěn)定以及寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)的刑事政策的施行是最為重要的原因。作為一種趨勢(shì)，刑法私法化既有積極價(jià)值，又不可避免地對(duì)有罪必罰原則造成了一定的沖擊，，與刑罰目的、罪刑法定原則、罪刑相適應(yīng)原則以及法律面前人人平等原則存在一定的沖突。因而，有必要從憲法上對(duì)刑法私法化予以規(guī)定，以更好地發(fā)揮刑法的功能和作用。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the mainstream view is that criminal law is public law, but the supplement of criminal law determines that criminal law can only be security law. With the development of theory and practice, criminal law gradually appears the tendency of private law, and its typical symbol is the emergence of criminal reconciliation system. As a new thing, criminal reconciliation has the characteristics of flexibility, autonomy, materiality, permanence and so on, which is different from the traditional dispute resolution, and it has the positive value of justice and benefit. It can better reflect the interests of victims, improve the efficiency of litigation, resolve social contradictions, but also have a certain negative impact. As one of the manifestations of private criminal law, the victim's consent only refers to the crime that violates the meaning of the victim as the constitutive element without the victim's commitment. The theory of victim consent has an important influence on criminal law, especially on the theory of crime. In addition, the transformation of the realization of criminal responsibility is one of the manifestations of private criminal law. With the development of criminal rule of law, light punishment and non-penalty gradually replace the traditional heavy punishment doctrine, which is in line with the humanitarianism and the international trend. There are many reasons for the privatization of criminal law. The most important reason is the construction of harmonious society, the maintenance of social stability and the enforcement of criminal policy. As a trend, the privatization of criminal law has both positive value and inevitable impact on the principle of crime and punishment, as well as the purpose of punishment and the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime. There are some conflicts between the principle of adaptation of crime and punishment and the principle of equality before the law. Therefore, it is necessary to regulate the private law of criminal law from the constitution, so as to bring the function and function of criminal law into full play.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 田小豐;;我國(guó)刑事和解制度構(gòu)建之我見——兼評(píng)我國(guó)《刑事訴訟法修正案(草案)》第五編第二章[J];福建論壇(社科教育版);2011年10期

2 姜雯;;刑法公法說之反思[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年08期

3 李文燕,田宏杰;被害人承諾的刑法意義[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

4 張明楷;刑法在法律體系中的地位——兼論刑法的補(bǔ)充性與法律體系的概念[J];法學(xué)研究;1994年06期

5 陳光中;;刑事和解的理論基礎(chǔ)與司法適用[J];人民檢察;2006年10期

6 陳興良;刑法謙抑的價(jià)值蘊(yùn)含[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1996年03期

7 曾友祥;;中國(guó)刑事和解價(jià)值之辯[J];政法論壇;2011年06期

8 孫國(guó)祥;;刑事和解中的價(jià)值沖突和制度架構(gòu)[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 田小豐;論刑事和解[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：1851130