本文選題：醉酒駕駛 + 缺陷��； 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國是一個酒文化比較發(fā)達的國家,隨著機動車在國民生活中的日益普及,酒后駕車的現(xiàn)象也日益普遍,一些醉駕者釀造了許多悲慘的交通事故。2011年5月1日實施的《刑法修正案(八)》將醉駕入刑,是根據(jù)血液中酒精含量作為唯一的依據(jù)定罪量刑：酒精含量達到80mg以上,屬于醉酒駕車。但是從生物學(xué)角度來講,由于生物的多樣性和駕駛?cè)说膫�體差異,每個人對于酒精的抵抗能力不同：有的人生來滴酒不沾,喝一小口就面紅耳赤、語無倫次、頭昏眼花,手腳無力,形成了生物學(xué)上的酒醉,但他的100ml血液中酒精含量位達到80mg以上,不構(gòu)成法律規(guī)定上的醉駕；而有的人抗酒精能力強,喝酒很多,100ml血液中酒精含量達到80mg以上,在生物學(xué)角度上來講并未醉,卻達到了法律規(guī)定上的醉駕。筆者認為我們需要在爭議與質(zhì)疑之中完善醉駕型危險駕駛罪,既保護公共安全,又公平公正地保護喝酒駕車者的合法權(quán)益,同時也可傳承我國歷史悠久的酒文化。在本文中,筆者首先以湖南省永州市零陵區(qū)為調(diào)查地分發(fā)200份調(diào)查問卷,了解永州零陵區(qū)各個年齡階層、有駕照者與無駕照者及飲酒者與非飲酒者對醉酒駕駛的看法,通過調(diào)取醉駕入刑后2011年5月1日至2014年6月10日湖南省永州市零陵區(qū)人民法院審理醉駕型危險駕駛案件(已決)情況,通過分析醉駕型危險駕駛行為的趨勢。之后認為：我國的醉駕型危險駕駛醉駕罪設(shè)置存在標準科學(xué)性不強、交通工具規(guī)定太單一、法定刑配置不完備和現(xiàn)行規(guī)定實際可操作性不強等諸多缺陷,并通過對法律建制比較完善的美國、俄羅斯、日本等國家的立法考察,發(fā)現(xiàn)美國心理感化和執(zhí)法過程、俄羅斯區(qū)別對待規(guī)定、美國和俄羅斯規(guī)定資格刑的設(shè)立都值得我們借鑒,并提出設(shè)置酒駕行政許可證構(gòu)想、制定可執(zhí)行和更公平的方案及出臺科學(xué)的醉駕標準、擴大駕駛交通工具的范圍、完善法定刑配置等完善危險駕駛罪刑事立法的建議,在結(jié)合我國國情和文化傳統(tǒng)的同時吸收國外一些法律制度中的精髓,從根本上完善我國醉駕型危險駕駛罪規(guī)制。
[Abstract]:China is a relatively developed country with wine culture. With the increasing popularity of motor vehicles in national life, the phenomenon of drunk driving is becoming more and more common. Some drunken drivers have brewed many tragic traffic accidents. The Amendment (VIII) to the Criminal Code, introduced on May 1, 2011, penalizes drunk driving on the basis of the alcohol content in the blood as the only basis for sentencing: alcohol levels above 80mg. Belong to drunken driving. But from a biological point of view, because of biological diversity and individual differences in drivers, everyone has a different ability to resist alcohol: some people are born without alcohol, with a small mouthful of blushing, incoherent, dizzy, His hands and feet were weak, and he became biologically drunk, but his blood alcohol level of 100ml was above 80mg, which did not constitute a drunken driving prescribed by law; and some people had a strong anti-alcoholism, and many drank more than 100ml of alcohol in their blood to the level of 80mg. From a biological point of view, not drunk, but reached the legal requirements of drunk driving. The author thinks that we need to perfect the crime of drunk driving in the dispute and doubt, not only to protect the public safety, but also to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the drinkers fairly and fairly, and at the same time, we can inherit the wine culture of our country with a long history. In this paper, the author first distributes 200 questionnaires on the basis of investigation in the Lingling District of Yongzhou City, Hunan Province, to understand the views of drunken driving among all age groups, drivers and unlicensed drivers, and drinkers and non-drinkers. From May 1, 2011 to June 10, 2014, the people's Court of the Lingling District of Yongzhou City, Hunan Province, tried the case of dangerous driving of drunk driving (determined), and analyzed the trend of dangerous driving behavior of drunk driving. After that, the author thinks that the establishment of the crime of drunk driving in our country is not scientific enough, the regulation of vehicle is too single, the disposition of legal punishment is not complete, and the actual operation of the current regulation is not strong enough, and so on. And through the legislative investigation of the United States, Russia, Japan and other countries whose legal system is relatively perfect, it is found that the process of psychological influence and law enforcement in the United States, the provisions of different treatment in Russia, and the establishment of the qualification penalty in the United States and Russia are worthy of our reference. It also puts forward some suggestions such as setting up an administrative license for drunk driving, formulating an executable and fairer scheme, introducing scientific drunk driving standards, expanding the range of driving vehicles, perfecting the legal punishment arrangement, and so on, to perfect the criminal legislation of dangerous driving crime. In combination with China's national conditions and cultural traditions, at the same time absorb the essence of some foreign legal systems, fundamentally improve the crime of drunk driving dangerous driving regulation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 朱丹寧;;強化法律責任 加大處罰力度——看日本關(guān)于酒后駕車、機動車肇事的部分相關(guān)法律規(guī)定[J];道路交通管理;2009年12期

2 趙秉志;張磊;;“酒駕”危害行為的刑法立法對策[J];中國檢察官;2010年03期

3 張明楷;;危險駕駛的刑事責任[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年06期

，

本文編號：1822475