發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-28 16:27

  本文選題：共犯競(jìng)合 + 分工分類法　； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：共犯競(jìng)合屬于共同犯罪中一種較為特殊的類型,德日等國對(duì)共犯競(jìng)合的理論探討較多,但目前中國刑法理論界對(duì)共犯競(jìng)合的研究不全面,具體表現(xiàn)在對(duì)其具體含義表述模糊、競(jìng)合產(chǎn)生原因、處理方法等方面,均存在一定的不足,但司法實(shí)踐中存在共犯競(jìng)合現(xiàn)象,理論研究的缺乏,導(dǎo)致了實(shí)踐中法律適用的困難。本文引言部分主要是闡述本文論題的意義,同時(shí)簡(jiǎn)要介紹共犯競(jìng)合問題產(chǎn)生的原因,接著指出了目前德國和日本以及中國部分學(xué)者對(duì)于共犯競(jìng)合問題的研究狀況,最后對(duì)論文結(jié)構(gòu)安排進(jìn)行了說明。本文除引言外主要包括四個(gè)部分:第一部分是對(duì)共犯競(jìng)合的概念、產(chǎn)生根源的探討。首先闡述了共犯競(jìng)合產(chǎn)生的根源是由于共同犯罪人分工分類理論,正是由于分工分類方法的出現(xiàn),實(shí)踐中便會(huì)產(chǎn)生一人兼具多個(gè)共犯形態(tài)的情況出現(xiàn)。同時(shí),共犯競(jìng)合具有同一主體實(shí)施、多個(gè)異質(zhì)行為競(jìng)合、多行為存在于同一犯罪構(gòu)成等特點(diǎn)。共犯競(jìng)合作為競(jìng)合犯罪的一種,與法條競(jìng)合及想象競(jìng)合存在較大不同。第二部分對(duì)共犯競(jìng)合現(xiàn)象產(chǎn)生的過程進(jìn)行了分析,在共同犯罪人分類理論存在主觀說、客觀說、折中說的背景下,產(chǎn)生了分工分類法和作用分類法兩種具體的共同犯罪人分類方法,單純采用分工分類法以及兼采兩種分類方法,都會(huì)導(dǎo)致共犯競(jìng)合現(xiàn)象的產(chǎn)生。第三部分是對(duì)共犯競(jìng)合在刑法體系中的定位以及共犯競(jìng)合現(xiàn)象分類的探討。共犯競(jìng)合應(yīng)當(dāng)被定位在法律效果論中,只有確定構(gòu)成競(jìng)合后,才有進(jìn)一步探討的必要。對(duì)共犯競(jìng)合的分類,可以從形式上和實(shí)質(zhì)上進(jìn)行劃分,同時(shí)結(jié)合我國實(shí)際,對(duì)我國存在的共犯競(jìng)合現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行了劃分。第四部分主要分析了解決共犯競(jìng)合現(xiàn)象的辦法。首先闡述了在解決共犯競(jìng)合現(xiàn)象方面的理論分歧,應(yīng)當(dāng)充分采納吸收說的觀點(diǎn)。在具體的解決方法上,按照高度行為吸收低度行為、實(shí)行行為吸收非實(shí)行行為的原則進(jìn)行處理。
[Abstract]:Complicity is a kind of special type of joint crime. Germany, Japan and other countries have discussed more about the theory of complicity, but at present, the study of accomplice in Chinese criminal law theory is not comprehensive, and the concrete manifestation is that the concrete meaning is vague. There are some deficiencies in the cause of concurrence and the method of dealing with it, but the phenomenon of complicity in judicial practice and the lack of theoretical research lead to the difficulty of applying the law in practice. The introduction of this paper is mainly about the significance of this thesis, and also briefly introduces the reasons for the problem of complicity, and then points out the current research situation of some scholars in Germany, Japan and China on the issue of complicity. Finally, the structure of the paper is explained. In addition to the introduction, this paper mainly includes four parts: the first part is to discuss the concept of complicity and its origin. At first, the author explains that the root of the joint criminal concurrence is the theory of the division of labor of the joint offender, and it is precisely because of the appearance of the division of labor classification method that the situation of one person having multiple accomplices appears in practice. At the same time, the accomplice concurrence has the characteristics of the same subject, multiple heterogeneous behaviors and multiple behaviors in the same crime. As a kind of concurrence crime, accomplice is different from law and imagination. The second part analyzes the process of the phenomenon of complicity. Under the background of subjective theory, objective theory and eclectic theory, The division of labor classification and the role of the classification of the two specific common criminal classification methods, the use of division of labor classification and both of the two classification methods, will lead to the emergence of the phenomenon of complicity. The third part discusses the orientation and classification of complicity in criminal law system. Accomplice should be positioned in the theory of legal effect. The classification of accomplice concurrence can be divided in form and substance, at the same time, the phenomenon of accomplice concurrence in our country is divided according to the reality of our country. The fourth part mainly analyzes the solution to the phenomenon of complicity. Firstly, this paper expounds the theoretical differences in solving the phenomenon of complicity, which should be fully adopted. In the concrete solution, according to the high behavior absorbs the low degree behavior, carries on the behavior absorption not to carry out the behavior principle to carry on the treatment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D914

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 林亞剛,趙慧;論共犯關(guān)系的競(jìng)合[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2004年03期

2 黃京平;陳毅堅(jiān);;法條競(jìng)合犯的類型及其法律適用[J];中國刑事法雜志;2007年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1816027