本文選題：危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪 + 醉駕��； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近些年來(lái)，我國(guó)機(jī)動(dòng)車數(shù)量猛增，同時(shí)，，隨著我國(guó)酒桌文化的影響，越來(lái)越多的人忽視交通法規(guī)醉酒駕車，造成嚴(yán)重危害后果，給人民群眾的生命財(cái)產(chǎn)、健康安全都構(gòu)成了嚴(yán)重威脅。為了懲治并預(yù)防醉酒駕駛的行為，維護(hù)人民群眾的生命安全和出行安全，《刑法修正案(八)》第22條規(guī)定：“在刑法第133條中新增一款規(guī)定——在道路上醉酒駕駛機(jī)動(dòng)車的，處拘役，并處罰金。該規(guī)定于2011年5月1日開(kāi)始生效”�！白眈{入刑”自此在刑法條文中被確定下來(lái)，之后，各地也紛紛開(kāi)展懲處“醉駕”活動(dòng)，全國(guó)各地不斷有醉駕者被判處刑事處罰，確實(shí)達(dá)到了立法的目的，取得了預(yù)期的效果，但由于沒(méi)有具體的量刑尺度，全國(guó)各地對(duì)醉駕行為的判決結(jié)果都不一樣，有“同罪不同罰”，有緩刑，有拘役，有堅(jiān)持“一律入刑的”，有因?yàn)榍楣?jié)顯著輕微而不認(rèn)為是犯罪的，有用行政處罰代之的，有取證標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不統(tǒng)一的，引起了廣泛爭(zhēng)議。廣大民眾開(kāi)始質(zhì)疑:“醉駕是否應(yīng)一律入罪”、“醉駕量刑是否可以使用緩刑和累犯制度”、“應(yīng)該適用哪一種檢驗(yàn)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”，“是否設(shè)置資格刑”，“主刑是否需要完善分類”等等問(wèn)題，這些問(wèn)題造成了“醉駕”型危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪實(shí)行的模糊地帶，因此，需要對(duì)“醉駕”型危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪的爭(zhēng)議性問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探討，進(jìn)一步明確“醉駕”型危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪的犯罪構(gòu)成，就醉駕行為是否一律入罪提出自己的觀點(diǎn)。而且，醉酒駕駛行為不僅會(huì)構(gòu)成危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪，還可能會(huì)引發(fā)危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪與其他罪名的競(jìng)合和重疊，有必要梳理出醉駕行為引發(fā)的自下而上的刑罰體系。并對(duì)“醉駕”型危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪執(zhí)法和司法中的其他問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探討，為本罪的完善提出創(chuàng)造性的建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the number of motor vehicles in China has increased dramatically. At the same time, with the influence of the wine table culture in China, more and more people ignore the traffic laws and regulations and drive drunk, causing serious harm to the people and giving life and property to the people. Health and safety pose a serious threat. In order to punish and prevent drunken driving and to safeguard the safety of life and travel of the people, Article 22 of the Amendment to the Criminal Law (VIII) stipulates: "A new paragraph in Article 133 of the Criminal Law provides that those who drive a motor vehicle drunk on the road, Be sentenced to criminal detention and a fine. This provision shall enter into force on May 1, 2011. " Since then, "drunk driving into the criminal law" has been determined in the articles of the criminal law. After that, many localities have also carried out activities to punish "drunk driving". In various parts of the country, drunken drivers have been sentenced to criminal punishment, which has indeed achieved the purpose of legislation and achieved the expected results. However, since there is no specific measure of sentencing, the results of judgments on drunken driving are different across the country. There are "different penalties for the same crime," probation, criminal detention, and insistence on "all people entering the criminal penalty." Some of them are not considered to be criminal because the circumstances are significantly minor, some are replaced by administrative punishment, and the standard of evidence is not uniform, which has aroused wide controversy. The general public began to question: "should drunk driving be all criminalized," "can we use the probation and recidivism system in drunk driving sentencing," "what kind of test should be applied," and "is there a qualification penalty?" Such problems as "whether the main punishment needs to be improved and classified", which result in the fuzzy zone of "drunk driving" type dangerous driving crime, therefore, need to discuss the controversial problem of "drunk driving" type dangerous driving crime. The criminal constitution of "drunk driving" type dangerous driving crime is further clarified, and the author puts forward his own view on whether drunk driving behavior is all criminalized. Moreover, drunken driving behavior will not only constitute the crime of dangerous driving, but also may lead to the competition and overlap between the crime of dangerous driving and other charges. It is necessary to sort out the bottom-up penalty system caused by drunk driving behavior. It also probes into other problems in law enforcement and judicature of "drunk driving" type dangerous driving crime, and puts forward creative suggestions for the perfection of this crime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王東陽(yáng);;論寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)刑事政策實(shí)施的外部保障[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年03期

2 翁凱一;;寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)在刑事立法中的適用及前景——以《刑法修正案(七)》為例[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年06期

3 袁彬;高雪梅;;論“酒駕肇事”案件的刑法理論問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年12期

4 王武良;竇豐;;寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)刑事司法政策與刑法適用問(wèn)題的研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年02期

5 賈凌;畢起美;;醉酒駕駛行為入罪論[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年09期

6 于志剛;;危險(xiǎn)駕駛行為的罪刑評(píng)價(jià)——以“醉酒駕駛”交通肇事行為為視角[J];法學(xué);2009年09期

7 葉良芳;;危險(xiǎn)駕駛罪的立法證成和規(guī)范構(gòu)造[J];法學(xué);2011年02期

8 周詳;;民生法治觀下“危險(xiǎn)駕駛”刑事立法的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估[J];法學(xué);2011年02期

9 曲新久;;醉駕不一律入罪無(wú)需依賴于“但書(shū)”的適用[J];法學(xué);2011年07期

10 湯濤,黃富穎;原因上的自由行為與急性酒中毒的司法精神病鑒定[J];法醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2000年04期

本文編號(hào)：1815870