發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-23 19:42

  本文選題：受賄罪 + 法定刑��； 參考：《蘇州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近些年，我國(guó)受賄犯罪大案、要案頻發(fā)，一方面是社會(huì)體制不完善所造成，另一方面也是我國(guó)刑事立法和司法缺陷所造成。立法上體現(xiàn)在法定刑設(shè)計(jì)不合理，未實(shí)現(xiàn)刑罰個(gè)別化的要求。司法上適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不統(tǒng)一，造成同罪異罰的不合理現(xiàn)象。為了完善我國(guó)受賄罪法定刑設(shè)置，體現(xiàn)刑罰的積極意義，有必要重構(gòu)受賄罪的法定刑，進(jìn)而為遏制受賄犯罪的高發(fā)態(tài)勢(shì)提供合理的刑罰支持。為了明確我國(guó)受賄罪法定刑設(shè)置的背景和優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)及完善受賄罪法定刑，筆者主要從以下幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了研究、論述： 第一部分，為了探尋我國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑法中受賄罪的刑法理念和文化背景，筆者著重對(duì)我國(guó)古代有關(guān)受賄的刑罰制度進(jìn)行研究，主要以秦漢、唐、宋和明清四個(gè)時(shí)間段為節(jié)點(diǎn)，，理清我國(guó)古代受賄罪刑罰的發(fā)展軌跡，并分析其中體現(xiàn)的刑事政策。 第二部分，為了找出我國(guó)受賄罪法定刑中存在的問題與不足，借鑒大陸法系和英美法系先進(jìn)的立法理念以及司法理念，筆者在第二部分對(duì)兩大法系典型國(guó)家有關(guān)受賄罪的立法原則和法定刑設(shè)置進(jìn)行分析，進(jìn)而為我國(guó)受賄罪法定刑改革找到突破點(diǎn)。 第三部分，筆者主要通過中國(guó)古代與國(guó)外有關(guān)受賄罪法定刑的對(duì)比和實(shí)務(wù)案例的分析，對(duì)我國(guó)受賄罪法定刑中的死刑、無期徒刑、有期徒刑、附加刑設(shè)置依據(jù)以及數(shù)額在定罪量刑中的作用進(jìn)行了闡述，并進(jìn)一步指出了該罪法定刑在立法上的不足，并通過刑事政策對(duì)受賄法定刑設(shè)置的內(nèi)在要求，為我國(guó)受賄罪法定刑設(shè)置的完善找到需要改進(jìn)之處。 第四部分中，筆者在總結(jié)國(guó)內(nèi)外經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上，提出了完善受賄罪法定刑的建議，建議立法區(qū)分受賄主體身份分別確定法定刑，建議廢除受賄罪的死刑（包括死緩），建議設(shè)立罰金刑、提建議將受賄罪法定情節(jié)具體化等。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the major bribery cases and important cases occur frequently in our country. On the one hand, they are caused by the imperfect social system, on the other hand, they are also caused by the defects of our criminal legislation and judicature. The legislation is embodied in the unreasonable design of statutory punishment and the failure to realize the requirement of individualization of punishment. Judicial application of standards is not uniform, resulting in the same crime and different punishment unreasonable phenomenon. In order to perfect the legal punishment of bribery in our country and reflect the positive significance of punishment, it is necessary to reconstruct the statutory punishment of bribery, and then to provide reasonable penalty support for curbing the high incidence of bribery. In order to clarify the background, advantages and disadvantages of the statutory punishment of bribery crime in China and improve the statutory punishment of bribery crime, the author mainly studies from the following aspects, discusses: In the first part, in order to explore the criminal concept and cultural background of bribery in the current criminal law of our country, the author focuses on the study of the penalty system of bribery in ancient China, mainly taking the four periods of Qin and Han, Tang, Song and Ming and Qing as the nodes. This paper clarifies the development track of the crime of accepting bribes in ancient China, and analyzes the criminal policy embodied therein. In the second part, in order to find out the problems and deficiencies in the legal punishment of bribery in our country, we draw lessons from the advanced legislative and judicial concepts of the continental law system and the common law system. In the second part, the author analyzes the legislative principles and the legal penalty setting of the bribery crime in the typical countries of the two legal systems, and then finds a breakthrough point for the reform of the statutory punishment of the bribery crime in our country. In the third part, the author analyzes the death penalty, life imprisonment and fixed-term imprisonment in the legal punishment of bribery crime through the comparison of the legal punishment of bribery crime between ancient China and foreign countries and the analysis of practical cases. The basis of the additional punishment and the function of the amount in the conviction and sentencing are expounded, and the deficiency of the legislation of the statutory penalty of the crime is pointed out, and the inherent requirements of the legal penalty of bribery are also put forward through the criminal policy. For our country bribery crime legal penalty establishment consummation to find the place which needs to improve. In the fourth part, on the basis of summing up the experience at home and abroad, the author puts forward some suggestions to perfect the statutory punishment of bribery crime, and suggests that legislation should distinguish the status of the subject of bribery and determine the legal penalty respectively. It is suggested that the death penalty (including death penalty should be suspended, fine penalty should be set up, and the statutory circumstances of bribery crime should be specified).
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.392

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 嚴(yán)勵(lì);;廣義刑事政策視角下的刑事政策橫向結(jié)構(gòu)分析[J];北方法學(xué);2011年03期

2 趙秉志;陳志軍;;社會(huì)危害性理論之當(dāng)代中國(guó)命運(yùn)[J];法學(xué)家;2011年06期

3 董邦俊,唐子艷,楊劍;我國(guó)古代貪污罪立法的考察及反思[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

4 陳謙信;;單因素·多因素·層次系統(tǒng)——中國(guó)犯罪原因研究層次30年之述評(píng)[J];湖南公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

5 趙連穩(wěn);;中國(guó)古代刑罰的演變[J];山東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

6 釗作俊;現(xiàn)代死刑問題研究述評(píng)[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;1999年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 于雪婷;受賄罪法定刑設(shè)置研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

本文編號(hào)：1793335