本文選題：瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪 + 量刑　； 參考：《南昌大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前，瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪現(xiàn)象有越演越烈之勢(shì)，造成的危害結(jié)果也越來(lái)越大，嚴(yán)重影響了社會(huì)的穩(wěn)定與經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展。但是，，從法院審理各類(lèi)瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪的判決結(jié)果來(lái)看，該類(lèi)犯罪判處有期徒刑以上刑罰比較少、判處緩刑和免予刑事處罰的比較多，緩刑的判決適用率一直局高不下，量刑輕刑化的現(xiàn)象十分突出。產(chǎn)生這一現(xiàn)象的原因，既有司法環(huán)境中對(duì)瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪錯(cuò)誤的忽視、容忍、袒護(hù)，也有立法不周全造成的“立案條件苛刻、規(guī)范內(nèi)容模糊”。因此，深入分析瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪輕刑化的特點(diǎn)和成因，尋求科學(xué)適用刑罰對(duì)策，已成為當(dāng)前解決瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪輕刑化現(xiàn)象的緊迫任務(wù)。首先要改變?yōu)^職侵權(quán)犯罪輕刑化這一現(xiàn)象，可以通過(guò)改變輿論導(dǎo)向，增設(shè)緩刑聽(tīng)證制度。在立法上制定嚴(yán)格的量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，尤其是在瀆職類(lèi)罪名的量刑處罰中建議增設(shè)罰金或剝奪政治權(quán)利之類(lèi)的財(cái)產(chǎn)刑、自由刑，這樣對(duì)公職人員履行職務(wù)行為將起到一定的指引和警示作用，從而有效減少瀆職犯罪案件的發(fā)生；其次通過(guò)創(chuàng)新檢察機(jī)關(guān)內(nèi)部工作機(jī)制，加強(qiáng)監(jiān)督，強(qiáng)化聯(lián)合，減少法官自由裁量權(quán)“被個(gè)體化”而造成的量刑不均衡影響。 近年來(lái)，本人所在的檢察機(jī)關(guān)辦理了多起瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪案件，這類(lèi)案件量刑上普遍存在一個(gè)問(wèn)題，即輕刑化，本文將結(jié)合近年來(lái)?yè)嶂菔惺袇^(qū)兩級(jí)檢察機(jī)關(guān)所辦理的瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪案件為角度，分析瀆職犯罪量刑輕刑化的危害和原因，并提出了一些實(shí)用性和可操作性的建議及對(duì)策。文章共由五部分組成：第一部分是引言，主要論述撰寫(xiě)這篇論文的時(shí)代背景及寫(xiě)作意義，以及目前這方面理論研究的現(xiàn)狀。第二部分是關(guān)于瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪量刑輕刑化之概述，主要論述了瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪的涵義、現(xiàn)實(shí)危害以及瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪量刑輕刑化的具體表現(xiàn)。第三部分是瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪量刑輕刑化之弊端。第四部分是瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪量刑輕刑化之成因。文章從立法缺陷、執(zhí)法環(huán)境人文化、偵查部門(mén)自身不足、檢法立場(chǎng)不同等方面闡述了瀆職侵權(quán)案件量刑輕刑化現(xiàn)象存在的原因。第五部分是解決瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪量刑輕刑化之對(duì)策。該部分從加大宣傳力度、提高反瀆職侵權(quán)工作的社會(huì)認(rèn)知度，規(guī)范和完善立法，改革權(quán)力分配機(jī)制、營(yíng)造“不能犯”之外界環(huán)境以及創(chuàng)新監(jiān)督體制、加強(qiáng)檢察監(jiān)督，調(diào)整辦案模式、加強(qiáng)辦案等方面對(duì)解決瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪量刑輕刑化提出了建議。
[Abstract]:At present, the crime of malfeasance is becoming more and more serious, and the harmful result is more and more serious, which seriously affects the stability of society and the development of economy. However, judging from the results of court judgments on various crimes of malfeasance and infringement, there are relatively few sentences of fixed-term imprisonment or above, more sentences of probation and exemption from criminal punishment, and the rate of application of suspended sentences has always been high. The phenomenon of light punishment in sentencing is very prominent. The causes of this phenomenon are the negligence, tolerance and protection of malfeasance and tort in the judicial environment, as well as the "harsh conditions of filing cases and vague standard contents" caused by inadequate legislation. Therefore, it has become an urgent task to analyze the characteristics and causes of light punishment of malfeasance tort crime and to seek scientific and applicable punishment countermeasures to solve the light punishment phenomenon of malfeasance tort crime. First of all, we should change the phenomenon of light punishment for malfeasance and tort crime, by changing the guidance of public opinion, we can add the system of probation hearing. In legislation, it is necessary to establish strict sentencing standards. In particular, in the punishment for crimes of dereliction of duty, it is recommended that property penalties, such as fines or deprivation of political rights, be added to the punishment for crimes of dereliction of duty. This will play a guiding and cautionary role in the performance of public officials' duties, thereby effectively reducing the occurrence of cases of malfeasance; secondly, by innovating the internal working mechanism of procuratorial organs, strengthening supervision and strengthening joint efforts, Reduce the judge's discretion to "be individualized" caused by the uneven impact of sentencing. In recent years, my procuratorial organ has handled many cases of malfeasance and infringement crimes. There is a common problem in sentencing such cases, that is, light punishment. Based on the cases of malfeasance and tort handled by procuratorial organs at two levels in Fuzhou city in recent years, this paper analyzes the harm and causes of light punishment for dereliction of duty, and puts forward some practical and operable suggestions and countermeasures. The article consists of five parts: the first part is the introduction, mainly discusses the background of writing this paper, writing significance, and the current situation of theoretical research in this field. The second part is a summary of the light punishment of dereliction of duty tort crime, mainly discusses the meaning of malfeasance tort crime, practical harm and the specific performance of light punishment of dereliction of duty tort crime. The third part is the malpractice of light punishment in the crime of malfeasance. The fourth part is the cause of light punishment in the crime of malfeasance. This paper expounds the reasons for the phenomenon of light punishment in cases of malfeasance and tort from the aspects of legislative defects, law enforcement environment culture, investigation department's own deficiencies, and the different standpoint of procuratorial law. The fifth part is the countermeasures to solve the crime of malfeasance. In this part, we should increase publicity, improve the social awareness of anti-malfeasance infringement, standardize and perfect legislation, reform the power distribution mechanism, create an outside environment of "no-offense" and innovate the supervisory system, and strengthen procuratorial supervision. The author puts forward some suggestions on how to solve the crime of malfeasance and light punishment in the aspects of adjusting the mode of handling cases and strengthening the handling of cases.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.392;D924.13

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙國(guó)華;楊寶琴;;預(yù)防瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪工作的現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2011年13期

2 陳重喜;;查辦司法瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪要強(qiáng)化“五個(gè)意識(shí)”[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2011年23期

3 方政軍,龔本源;正視瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪新特點(diǎn)[J];w攣胖蕓

本文編號(hào)：1780152