本文選題：刑法修正案 + 單行刑法�。� 參考：《甘肅政法學(xué)院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑法修改是對《刑法》條文進(jìn)行修改、補(bǔ)充的一種重要的立法工作,目前西方國家的刑法修改主要采用刑法修正案、單行刑法以及附屬刑法三種方式,我國在經(jīng)歷了1979、1997年兩次刑法的制定和修訂工作后,已經(jīng)能夠成熟的運(yùn)用刑法修正案對現(xiàn)有刑法條文進(jìn)行部分的修改與補(bǔ)充,迄今共通過八個(gè)刑法修正案。然而,頻繁修改的背后帶來了許多問題亟待去解決。對此,應(yīng)該在正確認(rèn)識刑法的價(jià)值功能,兼顧社會防衛(wèi)與人權(quán)保障的前提下,理性的劃清刑法介入領(lǐng)域,合理的確定擬修改的內(nèi)容。避免將刑法修改僅僅定位于彌補(bǔ)法律漏洞這一錯(cuò)誤傾向,因?yàn)檫@將會失去刑法的根基,罪刑法定與刑法謙抑。 刑法根基不容動搖,而且是修法必須堅(jiān)持的指導(dǎo)思想。就目前刑法修改而言,由于過多賦予刑法調(diào)控社會關(guān)系的責(zé)任,導(dǎo)致刑法謙抑未能得到良好體現(xiàn)。同時(shí),單一刑法修改方式已不足以應(yīng)對復(fù)雜的社會變動,需要重新審視現(xiàn)有刑法修改方式,并考慮從多種途徑進(jìn)行完善。在此,有必要建立刑法修改的跟蹤評估機(jī)制,動態(tài)管控修改內(nèi)容社會適用效果,以便及時(shí)進(jìn)行矯正。 基于上述認(rèn)識,本文著重解決刑法修改到底該修什么、該如何去修的問題,并試圖構(gòu)建更為科學(xué)合理的刑法修改路徑,從而切實(shí)提升刑法立法質(zhì)量。
[Abstract]:The amendment of the criminal law is an important legislative work to amend the provisions of the criminal law and supplement the provisions of the criminal law. At present, the amendment of the criminal law, the single criminal law and the subsidiary criminal law are mainly adopted in the amendment of the criminal law in the western countries. After having experienced the work of making and revising the criminal law for 19791997 years and two times, China has been able to apply the amendment of the criminal law to maturity. There are eight amendments to the provisions of the existing criminal law. However, there have been a total of eight amendments to the criminal law. However, there are many problems behind the frequent revisions. Therefore, we should rationally understand the value function of the criminal law and take into account the social defense and human rights protection, and rationally define the field of criminal law intervention, and make reasonable determination. It is a wrong tendency to avoid the amendment of the criminal law only to make up the loopholes of the law, because it will lose the foundation of the criminal law, the legality of the criminal and the criminal law and the modesty of the criminal law.
The foundation of the criminal law is not to be shaken, and it is the guiding ideology that the law must be upheaval. As far as the amendment of the criminal law is concerned, due to the excessive empower of the criminal law to regulate the social relations, the modesty of the criminal law has not been well embodied. At the same time, the modification of a single criminal law is not enough to cope with the complicated social changes, and it is necessary to reexamine the amendment of the existing criminal law. In this way, it is necessary to establish a tracking evaluation mechanism to modify the criminal law so as to dynamically control the effect of modifying the content of the society in order to correct it in time.
Based on the above understanding, this paper focuses on solving the problem of the revision of the criminal law and how to repair it, and try to build a more scientific and reasonable way to modify the criminal law so as to improve the quality of the criminal law.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：甘肅政法學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 涂龍科;程蘭蘭;;刑法修正案立法權(quán)違憲之思考[J];昆明理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2009年01期

2 趙秉志;刑法修改中的宏觀問題研討[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年03期

3 盧勤忠;;我國刑法修正案立法的問題及對策[J];南京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué).人文科學(xué).社會科學(xué)版);2009年03期

4 蔡雅奇;;晚近八個(gè)刑法修正案與相關(guān)國際公約關(guān)系論[J];湖南警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年05期

5 黎宏;刑法的機(jī)能和我國刑法的任務(wù)[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年04期

6 王永興;;綜述歷次刑法修正:內(nèi)容、特點(diǎn)和原因——兼論和諧社會視野下的《刑法修正案》[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

，

本文編號：1781218