本文選題：刑法 + 犯罪數(shù)額　； 參考：《廣西師范大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：數(shù)額作為對犯罪行為定罪量刑的重要依據(jù),在我國刑事立法中的作用十分突出,它不僅是確定犯罪是否成立的基本構(gòu)成,而且是對于判處刑罰與否以及判處輕重的基本因素,同時作為我國刑事立法、理論與司法中的一個突出問題,構(gòu)成我國刑事立法及司法體系中的一個重要“角色”,占掘了刑事立法及司法體系的半壁江山。在刑事理論、立法及司法中,其不僅具有重要的理論價值及法律價值,而且還涉及到法律適用的公平及公正等法律基本價值問題,在法律適用的公平、公正等原則性問題上,具有重要的理論價值和實踐意義。隨著我國市場經(jīng)濟的不斷發(fā)展,經(jīng)濟類犯罪與日俱增,數(shù)額問題也日漸受到刑法理論界進一步關注,在司法實踐中,對于犯罪數(shù)額的認定和計算問題,最高人民法院專門作出司法解釋。 在這樣的大趨勢之下,國內(nèi)外眾多學者對既定類型犯罪數(shù)額問題進行研究,發(fā)表了大量學術專著,其中包括盜竊、搶劫、詐騙、貪污受賄、侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)等類型,但是,相對于刑法整體規(guī)定的數(shù)額問題,對其本身內(nèi)涵界定、內(nèi)在特征以及細化分類的問題,在理論上進行分析的較少。因此,本文以現(xiàn)行立法規(guī)范及司法解釋作為基礎,進行相關的梳理和歸納,并通過國內(nèi)外立法模式進行比較,分析數(shù)額問題在刑法中定罪量刑的作用,整合理論界對于數(shù)額問題的觀點,發(fā)現(xiàn)數(shù)額問題在司法中存在的缺陷,提出相關完善建議,以供司法實踐辦理此類案件時作為參考�；诖�,本文以如下的思路展開研究： 本文總體構(gòu)架分為四大部分： 第一部分：犯罪數(shù)額基本概述。該部分從多角度進行分類匯總,歸納整合,先深化對數(shù)額問題的認識,對于立法概況進行橫向與縱向的理解,總結(jié)數(shù)額問題在刑法中的價值和意義。然后,該部分將犯罪數(shù)額作為整體,對其從多個角度進行分類,深化對其認識和理解,分析其本質(zhì)特征,總結(jié)出犯罪數(shù)額在刑法中的功能和作用。 第二部分：犯罪數(shù)額的規(guī)范揭示。該部分研究的意義在于,將司法解釋以數(shù)目的形式將空白規(guī)范予以填充,將模糊規(guī)范予以明確。通過分析我國刑法中具體犯罪數(shù)額條款的具體分布,以找出數(shù)額問題在刑法中存在的規(guī)律,從規(guī)律中闡述數(shù)額問題本身對于刑法理論和法律基本問題價值的作用。同時,分析犯罪數(shù)額中關于定罪和量刑兩者之間的關系,數(shù)額作為定罪量刑的決定性因素,直觀的量化了行為本身的社會危害程度,而定罪量刑的規(guī)則和方法,隨著經(jīng)濟發(fā)展、文明進步以及社會發(fā)展不斷調(diào)整,反過來促進數(shù)額問題不斷向更合理、更規(guī)則、更科學的方向完善。 第三部分：我國犯罪數(shù)額現(xiàn)狀的考察。該部分重點分析犯罪數(shù)額現(xiàn)狀,進而深入理解犯罪數(shù)額在我國的刑法中的重要意義。犯罪數(shù)額對于定罪和量刑都起著重要的作用,在我國刑法理念中責任主義沒有得到貫徹的情形下,犯罪數(shù)額無論在定罪的角度還是量刑的角度,都無法體現(xiàn)出罰當其罪的問題。以實證的方法針對我國制度及其運行進行研究,分析我國立法的規(guī)定和司法運行相關問題,有助于發(fā)現(xiàn)我國犯罪數(shù)額的問題,在此基礎上尋求我國問題的解決之道。 第四部分：完善我國犯罪數(shù)額的路徑思考。犯罪定量因素存在于我國法律制度的必要性和合理性,拋卻理論不言,犯罪成立如果采“立法定性、司法定量”的模式,必將觸動到我國法律體制的方方面面,從刑法到行政法,從實體法到程序法,這種“牽一發(fā)而改全貌”的改革方案不具有可行性。第二種方案會導致法律朝令夕改,有損法律的穩(wěn)定性,也不可取。真正值得考慮的是第三種方案。動態(tài)比例的方式,既符合犯罪數(shù)額設定的適時性和區(qū)域性要求,又能使公眾直觀感知具體犯罪的社會危害性。在統(tǒng)計工作日益健全完善、網(wǎng)絡普及、信息通達的今天,這種方式也具備相當?shù)目刹僮餍�。當司法現(xiàn)實無法應對數(shù)額標準過低或過高造成的訴訟壓力時,以動態(tài)比例的方式加以調(diào)整,較之直接提高或者降低具體的數(shù)額,更易于為公眾理解和接受。當然,這種方案也是對刑事立法和司法解釋大規(guī)模的清理和修改,不過,如此改動雖然可能會“傷筋動骨”,但卻是“標本兼治”的最優(yōu)選擇。鑒于此,該部分對數(shù)額問題在立法及司法等多方面的綜合分析,同時對比國內(nèi)外數(shù)額問題規(guī)定,發(fā)現(xiàn)并總結(jié)其中亟待解決的問題與不足,經(jīng)過權(quán)衡之后,提出完善建議。
[Abstract]:The amount as an important basis for the crime of conviction and sentencing in the criminal legislation of our country plays a prominent role, it is not only the basic constitution of the crime is established, but for the punishment and sentenced to the severity of the basic factors, at the same time as China's criminal legislation, a prominent problem in the theory and judicial that constitutes an important role in China's criminal legislation and judicial system, accounting for half of the country made criminal legislation and judicial system. In criminal theory, legislation and judicature, the law has not only theoretical value and important value, but also involves the law applicable to the fairness and justice of law basic value problems in the application of the law of justice, principle of justice, which has important theoretical value and practical significance. With the continuous development of China's market economy, economic crimes and increasing the amount of ask, The question also gradually becomes the theory circle of criminal law further attention in the judicial practice, for the problem of the identification and calculation of the amount of crime, the Supreme People's court to make judicial interpretation.
Under this trend, many scholars at home and abroad to study the established type amount of crime, has published a number of monographs, including theft, robbery, fraud, bribery, infringement of intellectual property rights and other types, however, relative to the amount of the whole criminal law provisions, the definition of its connotation, characteristics and problems detailed classification, analysis of less in theory. Therefore, this paper on the current legislation and judicial interpretation as the basis, and summarizes the relevant legislation, and models at home and abroad through comparison, analysis the amount of conviction and sentencing in the criminal law, the integration theory for the amount of point defects the amount of problems in the judicial practice, put forward relevant suggestions for the judicial practice, as a reference for handling such cases. Based on this, this paper takes the idea of the study are as follows:
The overall framework of this paper is divided into four parts:
The first part: basic overview. This part of the amount of crime from the perspective of classify, first summarized integration, deepening the understanding of the issue of amount, and the vertical and horizontal understanding of legislation, summarizes the value and significance of the amount in question in the criminal law. Then, this part will be the amount of crime as a whole, it from many aspects the angle classification, deepen the understanding and understanding of its essential characteristics, summarizes the function and effect of the amount of crime in the criminal law.
The second part: the amount of crime. This part is the standard to reveal the significance of the study, the judicial interpretation to the number of blank form specifications to be filled, fuzzy norms to be clear. Through the concrete analysis of the specific distribution of crime in the criminal law of our country in terms of the amount, in order to find out the amount of question in criminal law in the law, the amount of this problem the value of basic theory of criminal law itself and the role of law from the law. At the same time, the analysis about the relation between the conviction and sentencing of the crime amount, the amount as a decisive factor in the conviction and sentencing, intuitive to quantify the degree of social harm behavior itself, and the rules and methods of conviction and sentencing, along with economic development, continuous adjustment of civilization the progress and development of society, promote the amount to more reasonable and more perfect rules, more scientific direction.
The third part: the effects of the amount of crime situation in our country. This part focuses on the analysis of the amount of crime situation, and deeply understand the significance of the amount of crime in Chinese criminal law. The crime amount for the conviction and sentencing plays an important role, the principle of responsibility has not been implemented in case of China's criminal law concept, the amount of Crime no matter in the conviction or sentencing point of view, can not reflect the proportionality problem. In the empirical method for our system and its research, analysis of related problems of our legislation and judicial operation, contribute to our crime problem, the solution for this problem in our country on the basis of.
The fourth part: the perfection of China's path of the amount of crime. The crime quantitative factors exist in the legal system of our country the necessity and rationality, but the theory does not say, "if the crime legislation judicial qualitative, quantitative" model, will touch the law system of our country from the aspects of criminal law to the administrative law. From the substantive law to procedural law, the "one change picture" reform plan is not feasible. Second schemes will lead to the legal stability law inconstant in policy, loss, nor desirable. Really worth considering is the third schemes. The dynamic mode of the proportion of the amount of crime, not only conforms to the set time and regional requirements, social harm and make the public perceived specific crime. The popularity of the network in the statistical work is perfect, and the accessibility of information today, this way also has considerable maneuverability. When justice Reality can not cope with the amount of standard is too low or too high due to the litigation pressure, in a dynamic way to adjust the ratio, compared with the direct increase or decrease the specific amount, more acceptable for the public to understand and. Of course, this scheme is also on the criminal legislation and judicial interpretation and modification of large scale cleaning, however, such changes may "but it is optimal, injured in the sinews or bones" "cure" choice. In view of this, this part of the amount of the issue in the legislative and judicial aspects of the comprehensive analysis and comparison of domestic and foreign amount of provisions, and summarizes the problems and shortcomings, after weighing, puts forward some suggestions.

【學位授予單位】：廣西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前3條

1 張瑞幸;經(jīng)濟犯罪的數(shù)額對定罪量刑的作用[J];法律科學(西北政法學院學報);1990年02期

2 劉四新;郭自力;;恩格爾定律與財產(chǎn)犯罪數(shù)額標準之確定[J];法學家;2008年04期

3 劉德法 ,孔德琴;論經(jīng)濟犯罪數(shù)額的概念[J];法學評論;1991年01期

，

本文編號：1761580