本文選題：虐待罪 + 虐童罪�。� 參考：《上海師范大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文通過分析國外的立法例并且結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)實狀況對虐童行為進行了新的分析,通過一般性規(guī)定與列舉的方法對虐童行為進行了界定。即(任何人)對兒童肉體或者精神實施的損害兒童人身權(quán)利、民主權(quán)利的情節(jié)惡劣的行為,對虐童行為的特征與類型進行了進一步分析。對頻發(fā)的虐童事件,不同的人有不同的觀點。有人認為社會危害性不大,運用行政手段即可規(guī)制；有人認為虐童造成的嚴重程度足以達到刑法的規(guī)制程度,提倡虐童入刑或者完善刑法的規(guī)定等。已曝光的輕微虐童行為可以用行政手段來懲罰：嚴重危害社會的行為超出行政法范圍,進而納入刑法的規(guī)制,其中可能涉及的罪名有虐待罪、故意傷害罪、遺棄罪、侮辱罪、尋釁滋事罪等。這些罪名可以適用于一些虐童行為,如教師虐待嬰兒情節(jié)嚴重的,達到輕傷以上的損害結(jié)果時,可以適用故意傷害罪來定罪處罰;還有一些虐童行為面臨著無法解決的困境,如溫嶺虐童案,翻遍刑法沒有一個恰當?shù)目梢赃m用的罪名,因而提出虐童入刑的命題。文章從保護未成年人合法權(quán)益的立法傳統(tǒng)、刑法保護法益不完整性、虐童行為符合犯罪基本特征以及虐童案件的頻發(fā)來論證虐童入刑的必要性。在肯定虐童入刑的同時從三條路徑探討具體條款設(shè)置,其一、在現(xiàn)行刑法條文中增設(shè)虐童罪,規(guī)定其為行為犯,并且分析了其競合情形‘下的解決途徑,但是增設(shè)虐童罪與刑法的謙抑性政策與基本精神相違背,不宜采用此路徑。其二、增加虐待特殊人員罪,有其合理性,但是造成刑法適用的混亂、刑法體系的龐雜、加重司法負擔等,也不宜采用。其三,較為可行的方法——修改《刑法》第260條的規(guī)定,修改后的虐待罪主體包括家庭成員與非家庭成員,并且以告訴處理為原則,以公訴為例外的方式,同時加重虐待罪法定刑,發(fā)揮刑法在保護人們?nèi)松頇?quán)利、民主權(quán)利的的應有作用。不僅虐童行為可以迎刃而解,同樣可以解決虐待老人、虐待精神病人、虐待殘疾人等難題,也符合刑法的基本精神與基本政策。
[Abstract]:This paper analyzes the legislation of foreign countries and combines with the reality of our country to make a new analysis of child abuse behavior, and defines child abuse behavior by means of general provisions and enumerations.That is to say, the behavior of harming children's physical or mental rights and democratic rights, and the characteristics and types of child abuse are further analyzed.Different people have different views on frequent child abuse.Some people think that the harm of society is not great and can be regulated by administrative means; others think that the severity caused by child abuse is enough to reach the level of regulation of criminal law, advocating the punishment of child abuse or perfecting the provisions of criminal law, etc.The minor child abuse that has been exposed can be punished by administrative means: serious harm to the society beyond the scope of administrative law, and then into the regulation of criminal law, which may involve the crime of abuse, intentional injury, abandonment, insult,A crime of provoking trouble, etcThese offences can be applied to child abuse, such as serious cases of child abuse by teachers, which can be convicted and punished by intentional injury if the result of the injury is more than minor, and some of the child abuse acts face difficulties that cannot be solved.Such as Wenling child abuse case, there is no appropriate criminal law applicable to the criminal law, so the proposition of child abuse is put forward.This paper demonstrates the necessity of child abuse from the legislative tradition of protecting the lawful rights and interests of minors, the incomplete interests of criminal law protection law, the basic characteristics of child abuse and the frequent occurrence of child abuse cases.While affirming the punishment of child abuse, this paper probes into the specific provisions from three ways. First, the author adds the crime of child abuse to the existing criminal law, and defines it as an act offense, and analyzes the solution under the situation of competing.However, the addition of child abuse crime and the modest policy of criminal law is contrary to the basic spirit, so it is not appropriate to adopt this path.Second, it is reasonable to increase the crime of mistreatment of special personnel, but the confusion of criminal law application, the complexity of criminal law system and the increase of judicial burden should not be adopted.Third, the more feasible method is to amend the provisions of Article 260 of the Criminal Law. The subject of the amended crime of maltreatment includes family members and non-family members, and takes the principle of telling and handling as the principle and the public prosecution as the exception.At the same time, the legal punishment of the crime of mistreatment is aggravated, and the criminal law plays its due role in protecting people's personal and democratic rights.Not only child abuse can be solved, but also the problems of elder abuse, mental abuse and disability abuse can be solved, which is in line with the basic spirit and policy of criminal law.
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.34;D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王曉冰;;精神虐待不亞于身體酷刑[J];百科知識;2007年09期

2 范明友;淺議輕傷含義及其標準的制定依據(jù)[J];法律與醫(yī)學雜志;2002年04期

3 劉艷紅;;我國應該停止犯罪化的刑事立法[J];法學;2011年11期

4 張福娟;王慶;;國外殘疾兒童虐待研究與預防[J];青少年犯罪問題;2009年02期

5 胡巧絨;;美國兒童虐待法律保護體系介紹及對我國的啟示[J];青少年犯罪問題;2011年05期

6 皮藝軍;;“虐童”淺析[J];青少年犯罪問題;2013年01期

7 汪冒才;;淺議重新界定我國虐待罪的犯罪主體問題——以幼師虐童案為展開[J];北京青年政治學院學報;2013年01期

8 崔海英;;美國以心理學為基礎(chǔ)的虐童防控對策探析[J];青少年犯罪問題;2013年02期

9 鄭小楠;;論虐待行為的刑法控制——以教師虐童案為視角[J];法制與社會;2014年05期

10 袁彬;陰艾華;;兒童虐待與青少年違法犯罪關(guān)系研究[J];刑法論叢;2010年04期

，

本文編號：1761538