本文選題：聚眾斗毆轉(zhuǎn)化定罪　切入點：主體范圍　出處：《沈陽師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)今社會，市場經(jīng)濟(jì)高度發(fā)展，聚眾斗毆罪的常見性以及多發(fā)性，使其具有嚴(yán)重的社會危害性。不僅嚴(yán)重擾亂了社會公共秩序，同時也影響了我國社會的穩(wěn)定發(fā)展。如果不有效、及時地加以制止，那么這些犯罪活動極有可能演變?yōu)椤昂谏鐣再|(zhì)組織”等。聚眾斗毆罪的司法認(rèn)定在當(dāng)今我國司法界爭議較大，同時在實踐中，案情相似但判決結(jié)果大相徑庭的情況也很普遍。 1979年刑法第160條中有規(guī)定：“聚眾斗毆、尋釁滋事、侮辱婦女或進(jìn)行其他流氓活動，破壞公共秩序，情節(jié)惡劣的，處七年以下有期徒刑、拘役或管制。流氓集團(tuán)的首要分子，處七年以上有期徒刑�！辈浑y發(fā)現(xiàn)，聚眾斗毆罪正是從該條規(guī)定的“流氓罪”中分解出來的一個全新的罪名。1979年刑法廢除了流氓罪，并合理地分解為了“強(qiáng)制猥褻、侮辱婦女罪”、“聚眾斗毆罪”、“尋釁滋事罪”以及“聚眾淫亂罪”。本文擬運用刑法理論如共同犯罪等，通過對典型相關(guān)案例的分析，對聚眾斗毆罪轉(zhuǎn)化定罪的主觀罪過認(rèn)定、首要分子和積極參加者的轉(zhuǎn)化及對于相對刑事責(zé)任年齡人聚眾斗毆致人重傷、死亡的定罪量刑等問題作探討。 通過對聚眾斗毆罪轉(zhuǎn)化定罪的典型案例入手，可以較為深入地展開對于聚眾斗毆罪的轉(zhuǎn)化及定罪的論述，同時通過對主、客觀條件的分析并結(jié)合“主客觀原則”的邊界劃定，得出對聚眾斗毆罪不能簡單地以客觀結(jié)果歸罪，也應(yīng)考慮主觀故意的變化，兩方面結(jié)合更能對聚眾斗毆罪的轉(zhuǎn)化定罪有一個明晰的認(rèn)識這一結(jié)論。對于責(zé)任主體轉(zhuǎn)化的討論也是學(xué)術(shù)界普遍存在的爭議，能夠查清直接致害人、無法查清直接致害人以及符合共同犯罪構(gòu)成要件的共同行為人這三種情況下分析責(zé)任主體的轉(zhuǎn)化即具有至關(guān)重要的作用�！叭概c部分轉(zhuǎn)化說”這一學(xué)理上普遍存在的爭議，對于進(jìn)一步探討研究轉(zhuǎn)化主體范圍問題具有指導(dǎo)性的意義。此外，近年來未成年人聚眾斗毆致人重傷、死亡的案例也層出不窮，對于相對刑事責(zé)任年齡人聚眾斗毆罪的轉(zhuǎn)化及定罪、認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)也值得我們深思。鑒于此，，本文擬通過案例分析的方法，對聚眾斗毆罪的轉(zhuǎn)化及定罪進(jìn)行分析和探討。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, with the high development of market economy, the crime of affray is common and frequent, which makes it have serious social harmfulness.Not only seriously disturbed the public order, but also affected the stable development of our society.If it is not effective and can be stopped in time, then these criminal activities are likely to evolve into "triad organizations" and so on.Article 160 of the Criminal Code of 1979 provides that: "gathering people to fight, provoke trouble, insult women or engage in other rogue activities, and undermine public order, if the circumstances are abominable, shall be sentenced to imprisonment of not more than seven years, criminal detention or public surveillance."Ringleaders of rogue groups are to be sentenced to not less than seven years in prison. "It is not difficult to find that the crime of affray is a completely new crime which is decomposed from the "hooliganism" as stipulated in this article. In 1979, the criminal law abolished the crime of hooliganism and reasonably broke it down into the crime of "forcible indecency, insulting women" and "the crime of affray among the masses."The crime of causing trouble and causing trouble and the crime of gathering a crowd for obscenity.This article intends to use the criminal law theory such as joint crime, through the analysis of typical relevant cases, the crime of affray into the conviction of subjective guilt,The transformation of ringleaders and active participants as well as the problems of serious injury caused by affray and conviction and sentencing of death by people of relative age of criminal responsibility are discussed.By analyzing the typical cases of the crime of affray and conviction, we can deeply discuss the transformation and conviction of the crime of affray, at the same time, by analyzing the subjective and objective conditions and combining the boundary of "subjective and objective principle", we can delimit the boundary.It comes to the conclusion that the crime of affray can not simply be imputed with objective results, but also the change of subjective intention should be considered, and the combination of two aspects can make a clear understanding of the transformation and conviction of the crime of affray.The discussion on the transformation of the subject of responsibility is also a common controversy in academic circles, which can identify the direct perpetrators.It is very important to analyze the transformation of the subject of responsibility under the three circumstances that the direct victimizer and the co-perpetrator who accord with the constituent elements of the joint crime can not be found out.The theory of "whole case and partial transformation" is a common controversy, which is of guiding significance for further study on the scope of the subject of transformation.In addition, in recent years, minor affray caused serious injuries, death cases also emerge one after another, the relative age of criminal responsibility for the transformation of the crime of affray and conviction, the standard is worth our reflection.In view of this, this paper analyzes and discusses the transformation and conviction of the crime of affray through the method of case analysis.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉德法;;論聚眾犯罪的轉(zhuǎn)化犯問題[J];北方法學(xué);2010年01期

2 盧鵬;法律擬制正名[J];比較法研究;2005年01期

3 孫振江;;相對刑事責(zé)任年齡人的刑法處遇[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2009年06期

4 楊旺年;轉(zhuǎn)化犯探析[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);1992年06期

5 龍洋;;論轉(zhuǎn)化犯立法的理論根據(jù)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2009年04期

6 吳學(xué)斌;我國刑法分則中的注意規(guī)定與法定擬制[J];法商研究;2004年05期

7 孫國祥,魏昌東;試析聚眾斗毆罪中的轉(zhuǎn)化犯[J];法學(xué);2002年11期

8 薛進(jìn)展;轉(zhuǎn)化犯基本問題新論[J];法學(xué);2004年10期

9 張菁;;聚眾斗毆罪的司法認(rèn)定[J];法學(xué);2006年03期

10 郭潔;于陽;;未成年人相對負(fù)刑事責(zé)任范圍新論[J];青少年犯罪問題;2007年06期

本文編號：1728985