發(fā)布時間：2018-04-10 01:17

  本文選題：盜掘古墓葬罪　切入點：犯罪既遂　出處：《法制與社會》2016年35期

【摘要】：作為行為犯的典型代表,對于在認定盜掘古墓葬罪是否既遂時,需要分析其中的盜掘行為侵犯了何種法益來加以判斷。如果行為人所追求的盜掘行為已經(jīng)徹底完成,產(chǎn)生了行為人所想要的特定結果,例如打通盜洞、盜得文物等,此種情況下即可認定為盜掘古墓葬既遂。但如果行為人的盜掘行為并沒有達到其所追求的程度或者沒有造成特定的危害結果,如盜洞未能打通、未能發(fā)現(xiàn)墓葬、實質上沒有破壞到墓葬等,則應該認定為盜掘古墓葬罪未遂。
[Abstract]:As a typical representative of the criminal behavior, it is necessary to analyze what kind of legal benefits the burglary infringes when determining whether the crime of excavating ancient tombs is accomplished or not.If the act of theft and excavation pursued by the perpetrator has been completed thoroughly, and has produced the specific result desired by the actor, such as opening the burglaries, stealing cultural relics and so on, in this case, it can be considered as the excavation of ancient tombs.However, if the act of theft and excavation of the perpetrator does not reach the level sought by him or does not result in a specific harmful result, such as the failure of the burglaries to be opened, the failure to find the grave, and the failure to destroy the grave in essence, etc.,It should be considered as an attempt to excavate ancient tombs.
【作者單位】： 鄭州大學法學院;
【分類號】：D924.3

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 黃慶棠;如何理解盜掘具有歷史、藝術、科學價值的古墓葬？[J];人民司法;1994年08期

2 ;關于加強文物保護打擊盜掘古墓葬等文物犯罪活動的通知[J];遼寧省人民政府公報;2002年05期

3 ;保媤古巁文物彟法 N&，

本文編號：1729013