本文選題：免予刑事處罰　切入點：適用條件　出處：《華僑大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在當今世界，不同國家對免責的態(tài)度不同，有些國家認為免責后的行為不僅應(yīng)當是“無罪的”，而且應(yīng)當是“無辜的”，但是，也有一些僅僅承認，免責后的行為只能是“無罪的”。我國刑法明確主張，免責后的行為僅僅是“免予刑事處罰的”。免予刑事處罰適用于情節(jié)輕微，不需要判處刑罰的犯罪人。作為一種具有人道主義關(guān)懷的刑事責任承擔方式，免予刑事處罰體現(xiàn)了刑罰輕緩化和寬嚴相濟刑事政策的價值追求，但由于遭受重刑主義的影響，我國的免予刑事處罰尚存在立法的缺陷，導(dǎo)致其在司法實踐中適用不規(guī)范和在定罪量刑中不公平，削弱了免予刑事處罰的價值。因此，本文旨在以我國免予刑事處罰的適用條件為出發(fā)點，在分析我國免予刑事處罰制度之價值基礎(chǔ)上，，探討如何正確的適用免予刑事處罰制度。 免予刑事處罰制度在在定罪量刑中具有非常重要的價值。刑罰個別化、刑罰輕緩化和刑事責任實現(xiàn)方式多樣化從不同方面體現(xiàn)出其在免刑上的重要意義。刑法第三十七條是免予刑事處罰制度的突破口，條文中情節(jié)之范疇和情節(jié)是否輕微，針對刑法第三十七條能不能作為獨立免予刑事處罰根據(jù)進行了理性分析。認識到現(xiàn)實生活中對于免予刑事處罰的巨大需求以及定罪免刑和處刑之間存在的“質(zhì)差”，以更好地指導(dǎo)我們認識和把握刑法第三十七條的立法價值和該規(guī)定在適用分則時的實踐意義。在此基礎(chǔ)上，對比其與緩刑、管制和保安處分等制度的適用條件、適用根據(jù)、適用范圍，界定其分界限，以期能對司法實踐有所益助。最后研究作為單功能量刑情節(jié)和多功能量刑情節(jié)的免予刑事處罰制度，在量刑情節(jié)中的具體適用規(guī)則問題，綜合考察，具體適用個案，更好地實現(xiàn)罪刑“罰定”。
[Abstract]:In today's world, different countries have different attitudes towards exemption. Some countries believe that the conduct after the exemption should be not only "innocent" but also "innocent", but others simply admit it.The behavior after exemption can only be "innocent".The criminal law of our country clearly claims that the behavior after exemption is only "exempted from criminal punishment".Exemption from criminal punishment is applicable to offenders whose circumstances are minor and do not require a penalty.As a way to bear criminal responsibility with humanitarian concern, exemption from criminal punishment reflects the value pursuit of the criminal policy of lenient punishment and lenient punishment, but due to the influence of the doctrine of heavy punishment,There are still legislative defects in the exemption from criminal punishment in our country, which leads to its application in judicial practice and unfairness in conviction and sentencing, which weakens the value of exemption from criminal punishment.Therefore, the purpose of this article is to discuss how to apply the system of exemption from criminal punishment correctly on the basis of analyzing the value of the system of exemption from criminal punishment in our country based on the applicable conditions of exemption from criminal punishment in our country.The system of exemption from criminal punishment has very important value in conviction and sentencing.The individualization of penalty, the mitigation of penalty and the diversification of the way of realizing criminal responsibility reflect its significance in the aspect of exemption from punishment.Article 37 of the Criminal Law is a breakthrough in the system of exemption from criminal punishment. Whether the scope and circumstances of the circumstances in the articles are minor, this paper makes a rational analysis on whether Article 37 of the Criminal Law can be regarded as an independent basis for exemption from criminal punishment.Recognizing the great demand in real life for immunity from criminal punishment and the "qualitative gap" between conviction, immunity and punishment,In order to better guide us to understand and grasp the legislative value of Article 37 of the Criminal Law and the practical significance of this provision in the application of sub-provisions.On this basis, the author compares the applicable conditions of the system with probation, control and security measures, applies the basis, the scope of application, and defines its dividing line, in the hope that it can be of benefit to the judicial practice.Finally, this paper studies the system of exemption from criminal punishment as a single-function circumstances and multi-function circumstances of sentencing, the specific applicable rules in the circumstances of sentencing, comprehensive investigation, specific cases, better realization of the punishment of punishment "penalty".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 付立慶;論刑法適用中的隱性不平等——以劉海洋案為視角的考察[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年02期

2 劉軍;;為什么“刑法是一種絕對命令”[J];東岳論叢;2010年02期

3 陳航;;量刑基準確定方法研究[J];福建公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2007年05期

4 周光權(quán);量刑規(guī)范化:可行性與難題[J];法律適用;2004年04期

5 趙廷光;論我國刑法中的情節(jié)[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);1995年01期

6 劉守芬,方文軍;情節(jié)犯及相關(guān)問題研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2003年05期

7 王良順;;論量刑根據(jù)──兼及刑法第61條的立法完善[J];法學(xué)家;2009年05期

8 曹暉;;對未成年人犯罪免予刑事處罰的理解與適用[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年05期

9 張志強,歐錦雄;免予刑事處罰制度異議[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年01期

10 郜金泰;;完善我國未成年人犯罪非刑罰矯正制度的構(gòu)想[J];河北法學(xué);2008年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王晉岳;論刑事責任的實現(xiàn)[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

本文編號：1728684