本文選題：股權(quán)眾籌　切入點(diǎn)：非法吸收公眾存款罪　出處：《上海師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)股權(quán)眾籌迅猛發(fā)展,在一定程度上補(bǔ)充了我國(guó)場(chǎng)外市場(chǎng)單一化發(fā)展模式的不足,為小微企業(yè)進(jìn)入金融市場(chǎng)融資打開(kāi)方便之門(mén),金融市場(chǎng)得以注入新的活力,越來(lái)越發(fā)展成為我國(guó)多層次資本市場(chǎng)的重要組成部分。這種自發(fā)形成的融資手段能夠更好地引導(dǎo)資金流向,充分實(shí)現(xiàn)資金需求與供給的平衡,促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)。通過(guò)利用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)擴(kuò)大信息傳播范圍,緩解信息不對(duì)稱(chēng),降低項(xiàng)目發(fā)起人的融資成本,提高資本的利用效率。同時(shí)又為普通民眾利用多余資金進(jìn)行投資創(chuàng)造新的途徑,分享企業(yè)成長(zhǎng)帶來(lái)的收益,增進(jìn)社會(huì)公平感。然而以互聯(lián)網(wǎng)為依托的股權(quán)眾籌卻使得傳統(tǒng)“公募”與“私募”界限模糊,我國(guó)當(dāng)前對(duì)金融業(yè)實(shí)施嚴(yán)格管制,對(duì)公開(kāi)募集資金行為設(shè)置較高門(mén)檻,規(guī)定違法公開(kāi)募集資金應(yīng)承擔(dān)的法律責(zé)任,金融創(chuàng)新空間受到極大壓縮。在現(xiàn)行法律體系下股權(quán)眾籌存在較大法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn),不僅表現(xiàn)在民事法律和行政法律方面的風(fēng)險(xiǎn),甚至有觸犯刑法的可能性,其中最明顯的就是非法吸收公眾存款罪構(gòu)成要件與股權(quán)眾籌外在表征方面有諸多相似之處,如果在司法實(shí)踐中擴(kuò)大適用非法吸收公眾存款罪,將制約股權(quán)眾籌在支持小微企業(yè)發(fā)展方面的積極作用。文章試圖從非法吸收公眾存款罪與股權(quán)眾籌的對(duì)比中發(fā)現(xiàn)可將兩者區(qū)分的因素,以限縮解釋的方式使股權(quán)眾籌獲得更多發(fā)展空間。正文共分六部分:第一部分主要內(nèi)容是該問(wèn)題出現(xiàn)的背景、研究意義、研究現(xiàn)狀、研究思路和研究方法;第二部分的主要介紹股權(quán)眾籌的概念、性質(zhì)以及當(dāng)前發(fā)展出的商業(yè)模式,以及刑法適當(dāng)介入股權(quán)眾籌的態(tài)度;第三部分主要梳理我國(guó)當(dāng)前關(guān)于股權(quán)眾籌的法律規(guī)定以及實(shí)務(wù)中發(fā)生的相關(guān)案例;第四部分主要內(nèi)容為從非法性、公開(kāi)性與社會(huì)性等方面將股權(quán)眾籌與非法吸收公眾存款的關(guān)系進(jìn)行厘定,通過(guò)比較發(fā)現(xiàn),互聯(lián)網(wǎng)股權(quán)眾籌并不完全符合非法吸收公眾存款罪的構(gòu)成要件;第五部分對(duì)認(rèn)定非法吸收公眾存款罪其他問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of Internet stock rights crowdfunding, to a certain extent, complements the lack of a single development model of over-the-counter market in China, opens the door for small and micro enterprises to enter the financial market for financing, and the financial market can inject new vitality.More and more development becomes the important component of our country multi-level capital market.This kind of spontaneous financing means can better guide the capital flow, fully realize the balance between capital demand and supply, and promote the upgrading of economic structure.Through the use of the Internet to expand the scope of information dissemination, alleviate information asymmetry, reduce the financing costs of project sponsors, and improve the efficiency of capital utilization.At the same time, it creates a new way for ordinary people to use surplus funds to invest, share the profits brought by the growth of enterprises, and enhance the sense of social equity.However, the stock raising based on the Internet has blurred the boundary between the traditional "public offering" and "private equity". At present, our country has strictly regulated the financial industry and set a higher threshold for the public raising of funds.The provision of illegal public collection of funds should bear the legal responsibility, financial innovation space has been greatly compressed.Under the current legal system, there is a greater legal risk of crowdfunding, not only in the aspects of civil law and administrative law, but also in the possibility of violating the criminal law.The most obvious one is that there are many similarities between the constitutive elements of the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits and the external representation of public equity funding. If the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits is extended in judicial practice,It will restrict the active role of equity crowdfunding in supporting the development of small and micro enterprises.This paper tries to find out the distinguishing factors from the comparison between the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits and the stock rights raising, and to make the stock rights crowdfunding gain more development space by the way of limiting and shrinking explanation.The text is divided into six parts: the first part of the main content is the background of the problem, research significance, research status, research ideas and research methods; the second part mainly introduces the concept of crowdfunding.The nature and the current development of the business model, as well as the criminal law appropriate intervention in the public equity funding attitude; the third part mainly combed the current legal provisions on equity crowdfunding and related cases in practice;The fourth part of the main content is from the aspects of illegality, openness and sociality to determine the relationship between public equity financing and illegal public deposits, and find out by comparison.Internet shareholding crowdfunding does not fully accord with the constitutive requirements of the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits; the fifth part analyzes other problems of the crime of illegal public deposits.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924;D922.287

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 梅騰;閻二鵬;;“P2P網(wǎng)貸債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓”的刑法介入——以非法吸收公眾存款罪的實(shí)質(zhì)解釋為視角[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年02期

2 劉憲權(quán);;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融股權(quán)眾籌行為刑法規(guī)制論[J];法商研究;2015年06期

3 劉明;;論私募股權(quán)眾籌中公開(kāi)宣傳規(guī)則的調(diào)整路徑——兼評(píng)《私募股權(quán)眾籌融資管理辦法(試行)》[J];法學(xué)家;2015年05期

4 劉濤;戴鐵浩;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融中非法吸收公眾存款犯罪的界定與偵查研究[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年05期

5 董竹;尚繼權(quán);孫萌;;對(duì)《私募股權(quán)眾籌融資管理辦法(試行)(征求意見(jiàn)稿)》的討論[J];上海金融;2015年08期

6 劉新民;;“非法吸收公眾存款罪”的證券法規(guī)制研究[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年03期

7 彭冰;;股權(quán)眾籌的法律構(gòu)建[J];財(cái)經(jīng)法學(xué);2015年03期

8 安邦坤;;股權(quán)眾籌在多層次資本市場(chǎng)中的定位概論[J];現(xiàn)代管理科學(xué);2015年02期

9 文靜;;論股權(quán)眾籌的法律性質(zhì)及其運(yùn)用的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2015年02期

10 馮果;袁康;;境外資本市場(chǎng)股權(quán)眾籌立法動(dòng)態(tài)述評(píng)[J];金融法苑;2014年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 朱曉芹;;非法吸收公眾存款罪犯罪數(shù)額的認(rèn)定[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

2 邱有全;;“非法吸收公眾存款罪”中“存款”一詞不當(dāng)[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 范淼;非詐騙型非法集資犯罪范圍研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年

2 雷華順;眾籌融資法律制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 鄭楊;美國(guó)JOBS法案對(duì)我國(guó)眾籌模式的啟示[D];華僑大學(xué);2015年

2 王豪杰;我國(guó)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)股權(quán)眾籌的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及防范研究[D];北京外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué);2015年

3 孫哲;我國(guó)股權(quán)眾籌中投資者保護(hù)法律制度的構(gòu)建[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

4 李暢;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)眾籌法律問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2015年

5 徐曉東;眾籌的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與監(jiān)管研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2014年

6 楊明;論中國(guó)股權(quán)眾籌模式的法律定位與監(jiān)管[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2014年

7 劉紅;集資詐騙罪疑難問(wèn)題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1719872