本文選題：入戶搶劫　切入點(diǎn)：保護(hù)法益　出處：《華僑大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：“入戶搶劫”作為普通搶劫罪的加重犯予以重處，就決定了對(duì)“入戶搶劫”進(jìn)行理解與適用時(shí)要緊緊圍繞“入戶搶劫”所保護(hù)的法益，秉承刑法的罪責(zé)刑相適應(yīng)原則與謙抑精神。“入戶搶劫”的保護(hù)法益是公民的住宅安全，包括財(cái)產(chǎn)、人身、住宅安寧以及人們對(duì)住宅安全的信賴等權(quán)利。界定“戶”之合理標(biāo)準(zhǔn)：從封閉性和排他性兩個(gè)角度詳細(xì)闡述了“戶”的場(chǎng)所性特征；并從生活性、家庭性及供他人居住等方面深度剖析了“戶”的功能性特征。搶劫行為必須要發(fā)生在戶內(nèi)，但是要注意暴力行為的持續(xù)狀態(tài)，取財(cái)行為是否發(fā)生在戶內(nèi)，不影響“入戶搶劫”的認(rèn)定�！叭霊魮尳佟币笮袨槿酥阑蛲贫ㄖ雷约菏窃谒俗≌瑑�(nèi)實(shí)施搶劫犯罪；“入戶搶劫”犯罪的搶劫故意不一定形成于入戶前，，在戶搶劫也屬于“入戶搶劫”。轉(zhuǎn)化型“入戶搶劫”的先行行為包括入戶詐騙、入戶搶奪，并不必然要求先行行為構(gòu)成犯罪；轉(zhuǎn)化型“入戶搶劫”的場(chǎng)所限制是針對(duì)暴力行為或以暴力相威脅行為而言，并不是用于限制整個(gè)犯罪過(guò)程的。
[Abstract]:As the aggravated crime of ordinary robbery, "robbery into the house" should be dealt with seriously, which determines that the understanding and application of "robbery into the house" should closely revolve around the legal interests protected by "robbery into the house".Adhering to the criminal law of the principle of crime and punishment to adapt to the spirit of modesty.The protection law of "robbery into the house" is the right of citizen's residence safety, including property, person, house peace and people's trust in residence safety and so on.Defining the reasonable standard of "household": from the two angles of closure and exclusiveness, this paper expounds in detail the place characteristics of "household", and deeply analyzes the functional characteristics of "household" from the aspects of living, family and providing other people's residence.Robbery must take place in the household, but attention should be paid to the continuous state of violence and whether the act of taking money occurs in the household, which does not affect the identification of "robbery into the house"."robbery into the house" requires the perpetrator to know or presume to know that he is committing the crime of robbery in the house of another person; the robbery of the crime of "robbery into the house" is not necessarily formed before entering the house, and the robbery in the house also belongs to "robbery in the house".The leading behavior of transformed "robbery into the house" includes fraud and snatching, which does not necessarily require that the first act constitute a crime; the restriction of the place of the transformed "house robbery" is directed against the violent act or the threat of violence.Is not used to limit the whole process of crime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖中華;論搶劫罪適用中的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年05期

2 曾傳紅;論刑法中“入戶搶劫”的認(rèn)定[J];福建公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào).社會(huì)公共安全研究;2002年01期

3 龔培華,張菁;“搶劫犯罪法律適用疑難問(wèn)題”研討會(huì)綜述[J];法學(xué);2005年08期

4 項(xiàng)谷,曹堅(jiān);搶劫罪的情節(jié)加重犯若干問(wèn)題探討[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

5 劉鴻,熊永明;論非法侵入住宅罪的對(duì)象及親告問(wèn)題[J];南昌大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

6 張新江;對(duì)“入戶搶劫”立法的修改建議[J];人民檢察;2000年01期

7 周振想,林維;搶劫罪特別類型研究[J];人民檢察;1999年01期

8 劉明祥;事后搶劫問(wèn)題比較研究[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2001年03期

9 項(xiàng)谷;華肖;張菁;;入戶搶劫司法認(rèn)定若干問(wèn)題研究[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2005年02期

10 黃祥青;;論搶劫罪情節(jié)加重犯的認(rèn)定思路與方法[J];政治與法律;2005年06期

本文編號(hào)：1713032