本文選題：狀態(tài)犯　切入點(diǎn)：罪數(shù)形態(tài)　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：狀態(tài)犯這一概念雖然時(shí)有提起，但是我國(guó)刑法理論研究并未對(duì)其作出專門的研究及整合，對(duì)于狀態(tài)犯的細(xì)致分析和認(rèn)識(shí)具有重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。目前國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)者對(duì)于狀態(tài)犯概念的界定各有說(shuō)法，并未形成一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的概念表述形式，也未對(duì)其進(jìn)行專門的研究和探討，在刑法理論上還有極大空白。因此，有必要對(duì)狀態(tài)犯進(jìn)行深入研究，做出歸納總結(jié)，以便整合各位學(xué)者的學(xué)說(shuō)得到確定的概念表述形式，并從更為科學(xué)合理的角度提出狀態(tài)犯的概念以及通過(guò)對(duì)其特征的分析，從而與相關(guān)犯罪形態(tài)相區(qū)別，厘清與其他犯罪形態(tài)的關(guān)系。 狀態(tài)犯作為一種犯罪形態(tài)，其特征及表現(xiàn)形式素有爭(zhēng)議，因而對(duì)于狀態(tài)犯所對(duì)應(yīng)的具體犯罪的認(rèn)定也眾說(shuō)紛紜，尤其是對(duì)于綁架罪、重婚罪、拐騙兒童罪以及收買被拐賣婦女、兒童罪等，，這些爭(zhēng)議都將直接影響定罪量刑，從而為實(shí)現(xiàn)設(shè)置該罪名的現(xiàn)實(shí)目的制造規(guī)范適用上的混亂或障礙。因此，準(zhǔn)確闡述和歸納狀態(tài)犯的特征，有助于相關(guān)犯罪的定性、歸類，從而有效指導(dǎo)定罪量刑的司法實(shí)踐活動(dòng)。據(jù)此，本文將分為以下幾個(gè)部分進(jìn)行論述： 第一部分主要闡述狀態(tài)犯的理論維度。其中包括對(duì)狀態(tài)犯是否是一種獨(dú)立的犯罪形態(tài)的爭(zhēng)議進(jìn)行評(píng)述，如何對(duì)狀態(tài)犯的概念進(jìn)行重新厘定以及狀態(tài)犯在刑法理論體系的定位問(wèn)題。首先必須肯定狀態(tài)犯是一種獨(dú)立的犯罪形態(tài)，然后對(duì)狀態(tài)犯的內(nèi)部構(gòu)造進(jìn)行分析，得出狀態(tài)犯應(yīng)定位于罪數(shù)形態(tài)理論領(lǐng)域的結(jié)論，從而形成對(duì)狀態(tài)犯概念的新的理解，并由此闡述狀態(tài)犯的基本特征。 第二部分主要具體介紹狀態(tài)犯與罪數(shù)形態(tài)理論的關(guān)系。既然狀態(tài)犯應(yīng)定位于罪數(shù)形態(tài)論范疇，就必須厘清二者之間的內(nèi)部關(guān)系。首先是對(duì)狀態(tài)犯屬于何種罪數(shù)類型的討論，從罪數(shù)論的角度闡述狀態(tài)犯屬于典型的一罪類型，其次再將狀態(tài)犯與繼續(xù)犯、即成犯進(jìn)行細(xì)致的區(qū)分，以達(dá)到準(zhǔn)確認(rèn)定狀態(tài)犯的目的。 第三部分是關(guān)于狀態(tài)犯與事后行為理論的闡述。具體闡述事后行為論與狀態(tài)犯之間的關(guān)系，狀態(tài)犯與事后行為理論具有極大的契合度，特別是共罰的事后行為可以說(shuō)是屬于狀態(tài)犯一身專屬的理論，在實(shí)踐中對(duì)于狀態(tài)犯的處理基本是適用共罰的事后行為理論加以解決，其次明確可罰的事后行為與狀態(tài)犯的關(guān)系。 第四部分主要是對(duì)狀態(tài)犯相關(guān)罪名的認(rèn)定。在刑法理論上哪些罪名屬于狀態(tài)犯或不是狀態(tài)犯存在很大的爭(zhēng)議，本文選擇幾個(gè)罪名進(jìn)行分析。首先是對(duì)典型的狀態(tài)犯類型進(jìn)行闡述，包括盜竊罪、侵占罪等；其次是幾個(gè)爭(zhēng)議較大的罪名，諸如綁架罪、拐騙兒童罪、重婚罪、拐賣婦女、兒童罪以及收買被拐賣的婦女、兒童罪等。
[Abstract]:Although the concept of state crime has been brought up from time to time, the theoretical study of criminal law in our country has not made a special research and integration, which has important practical significance for the careful analysis and understanding of state crime.At present, domestic scholars have different views on the definition of the concept of state crime, and have not formed a unified form of concept expression, nor have they made a special study and discussion on it. There is still a great gap in the theory of criminal law.Therefore, it is necessary to make an in-depth study of the state crime and make an induction and summary, so as to integrate the conceptual expressions defined by the scholars' doctrines.And from a more scientific and reasonable point of view put forward the concept of state crime and through the analysis of its characteristics so as to distinguish from the related forms of crime and clarify the relationship between the other forms of crime.As a form of crime, the characteristics and manifestations of state crime are controversial, so there are different opinions on the specific crimes corresponding to state crime, especially for kidnapping, bigamy, abduction of children and buying off and trafficking of women.Children's crime, these disputes will directly affect the conviction and sentencing, thus creating confusion or obstacles in the application of norms for the practical purpose of establishing the crime.Therefore, the accurate elaboration and induction of the characteristics of state crime is helpful to the qualitative and classification of related crimes, so as to effectively guide the judicial practice of conviction and sentencing.Accordingly, this article will be divided into the following parts to discuss:The first part mainly expounds the theoretical dimension of state crime.It includes a comment on whether state crime is an independent form of crime, how to redefine the concept of state crime and the orientation of state crime in the theoretical system of criminal law.First of all, we must affirm that state crime is an independent form of crime, then analyze the internal structure of state crime, and draw the conclusion that state crime should be positioned in the field of crime number form theory, so as to form a new understanding of the concept of state crime.The basic characteristics of state crime are expounded.The second part mainly introduces the relation between the state crime and the number form theory.Since the state crime should be positioned in the category of number form of crime, it is necessary to clarify the internal relationship between the two.First of all, it discusses what crime number type state crime belongs to, expounds that state crime belongs to a typical crime type from the angle of crime number theory, and then makes a careful distinction between state crime and continuing crime, that is, adult crime.In order to achieve the purpose of accurate identification of state crime.The third part is about the state crime and the afterwards behavior theory elaboration.The relationship between the theory of posteriori behavior and the theory of state crime is expounded in detail. The theory of state crime and the theory of posteriori behavior has a great agreement, especially the theory of joint punishment of afterwards behavior can be said to belong to the theory of state crime.In practice, the treatment of state crime is basically solved by applying the theory of post-action of co-punishment, and then the relationship between the punishable afterwards behavior and state crime is clarified.The fourth part is the identification of the related charges of state crime.In the theory of criminal law, there are a lot of controversies about which crimes belong to state crime or not.The first is to expound the typical types of state crimes, including theft, embezzlement, and so on. Secondly, there are several controversial crimes, such as kidnapping, child abduction, bigamy, trafficking in women, children's crimes, and buying and buying of trafficked women.A child crime, etc.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 杜文俊;陳洪兵;;即成犯、狀態(tài)犯、繼續(xù)犯的理論界分和評(píng)價(jià)[J];東方法學(xué);2011年01期

2 劉憲權(quán);;罪數(shù)形態(tài)理論正本清源[J];法學(xué)研究;2009年04期

3 張明楷;結(jié)果與量刑——結(jié)果責(zé)任、雙重評(píng)價(jià)、間接處罰之禁止[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年06期

本文編號(hào)：1712764