本文選題：新罪增設(shè)　切入點：刑法漏洞　出處：《法學(xué)評論》2015年06期

【摘要】：我國總是存在設(shè)立各種新罪的立法建言,因為建言者認(rèn)為現(xiàn)行刑法存在漏洞。但他們所理解的漏洞,有的是因為作出片面解釋而造成不應(yīng)有的漏洞,有的是因為沒有進行法益解釋造成不應(yīng)有的漏洞,有的是因為進行了消極解釋而造成不應(yīng)有的漏洞,有的是因為過于追求立法的精細而造成不應(yīng)有的漏洞,有的是因為忽略立法類型化原則而造成不應(yīng)有的漏洞,有的是因為漠視刑法的最后手段性而造成不應(yīng)有的漏洞。這些罪名建言存在形形色色的不足:加大刑法條款日趨膨脹的風(fēng)險,擴張了刑法處罰范圍,抑止了刑法解釋功能的發(fā)揮,容易導(dǎo)致立法虛置,增大了刑法學(xué)習(xí)和適用難度。罪名建言要慎重考慮公眾認(rèn)同,罪名建言要遵循刑法專業(yè)特色,人大代表要慎用罪名建言的提案權(quán),刑法的完善既要適度修正,更要合理解釋。
[Abstract]:In our country, there are always legislative proposals for the establishment of various new crimes, because the proponents believe that there are loopholes in the existing criminal law. However, some of the loopholes they understand are caused by partial interpretation. Some are due to the lack of legal interpretation, some are caused by negative interpretation, and others are caused by the pursuit of legislative fineness. Some of these loopholes are caused by the neglect of the principle of the categorization of legislation. Some of them are caused by the disregard of the last resort of the criminal law. There are many kinds of shortcomings in the proposition of these charges: increasing the risk of the increasing expansion of the provisions of the criminal law, expanding the scope of criminal punishment, It has restrained the function of criminal law interpretation, easily led to legislation void, increased the difficulty of studying and applying criminal law. The proposal of charges should be carefully considered by the public, and the proposal of charges should follow the professional characteristics of criminal law. Deputies to the National people's Congress should be careful to use the right to propose charges, and the perfection of the criminal law should not only be amended moderately, but also reasonably explained.
【作者單位】： 南昌大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：2012年國家社科基金項目“器官移植的刑法問題研究”(項目號:12BFX053)成果之一
【分類號】：D924.3
，

本文編號：1684486