本文選題：危險犯　切入點：風(fēng)險社會　出處：《北方工業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本論文從危險犯的概念切入,探討危險犯的行為類型、風(fēng)險社會理論與風(fēng)險刑法的銜接、危險犯之"危險"與風(fēng)險社會之"風(fēng)險"以及風(fēng)險刑法之"風(fēng)險"之間的關(guān)系,對刑法教義學(xué)下危險犯的基本理論進行厘清。在此基礎(chǔ)上,運用SPSS軟件,對我國刑事法律規(guī)范中的危險犯內(nèi)容進行實證分析,重在發(fā)現(xiàn)危險犯立法數(shù)量之變化,體現(xiàn)在哪些領(lǐng)域,故意抽象危險犯、故意具體危險犯和過失具體危險犯的分布情況及比例,危險犯條文的刑罰配置;與此同時,以德國刑法為參考對象,對我國危險犯立法進行評析,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國危險犯立法存在的不足以及可借鑒的經(jīng)驗。接著對危險犯立法存在的爭議進行分析,主要有刑法保護的前置與刑法謙抑性之探討、社會防衛(wèi)與自由保障之協(xié)調(diào)、刑事處罰與行政處罰之銜接。然后,對危險犯立法應(yīng)當(dāng)考量的因素進行探討,主要體現(xiàn)在:憲法的價值指引和刑事政策之影響。對于危險犯立法應(yīng)充分考察現(xiàn)有的基本刑事政策和具體刑事政策,將其指導(dǎo)性要求貫徹到刑事立法之中,但應(yīng)進行限制;綜合考慮這些因素之后,提出我國的危險犯立法路徑選擇——即動態(tài)的立法路徑。最后,就我國危險犯立法完善提出建議。應(yīng)在環(huán)境犯罪領(lǐng)域、經(jīng)濟犯罪領(lǐng)域、個人法益領(lǐng)域?qū)ξｋU犯進行立法上的修改和完善,具體修改主要集中在法條的內(nèi)容、結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)置和刑法配置等方面。
[Abstract]:From the concept of dangerous crime, this paper discusses the behavior type of dangerous crime, the connection between risk society theory and risk criminal law, the relationship between "risk" of dangerous crime and "risk" of risk society, and "risk" of risk criminal law. This paper clarifies the basic theory of dangerous crime under the doctrine of criminal law. On this basis, by using SPSS software, this paper makes an empirical analysis of the content of dangerous crime in the criminal law norm of our country, and focuses on finding the change of the number of dangerous crime legislation. In what fields, the distribution and proportion of intentional abstract dangerous crime, intentional specific dangerous crime and negligent specific dangerous crime, and the penalty allocation of the articles on dangerous crime; at the same time, taking German criminal law as the reference object, This paper analyzes the legislation of dangerous crime in our country, and finds out the deficiency of the legislation of dangerous crime in our country and the experience that can be used for reference. Then, the author analyzes the disputes existing in the legislation of dangerous crime, mainly discusses the preposition of criminal law protection and the modesty of criminal law. The coordination between social defense and freedom protection, the connection between criminal punishment and administrative punishment. Then, the factors that should be considered in the legislation of dangerous crime are discussed. It is mainly reflected in: the value guide of constitution and the influence of criminal policy. The existing basic criminal policy and specific criminal policy should be fully examined, and the guiding requirements should be carried out into the criminal legislation, but should be restricted; After considering these factors synthetically, this paper puts forward the choice of legislation path of dangerous crime in our country-that is, the dynamic legislative path. Finally, it puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of the legislation of dangerous crime in our country, which should be in the field of environmental crime and economic crime. In the field of personal legal interest, the legislation of dangerous crime is amended and perfected, and the specific amendments are mainly focused on the content, structure and criminal law allocation of the law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北方工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳洪兵;;準(zhǔn)抽象危險犯概念之提倡[J];法學(xué)研究;2015年05期

2 曾粵興;周兆進;;污染環(huán)境罪危險犯研究[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2015年02期

3 王軍明;;風(fēng)險刑法視域下的經(jīng)濟刑法立法走向[J];延邊大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2014年06期

4 齊文遠;鄧紅梅;;論刑法與交通行政法的協(xié)調(diào)與銜接——以《道路交通安全法》《公路法》為視角[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2014年03期

5 陳興良;;風(fēng)險刑法理論的法教義學(xué)批判[J];中外法學(xué);2014年01期

6 王海橋;;我國經(jīng)濟刑法的行為類型分析[J];福建論壇(人文社會科學(xué)版);2014年02期

7 付立慶;;應(yīng)否允許抽象危險犯反證問題研究[J];法商研究;2013年06期

8 陳興良;;刑法的刑事政策化及其限度[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2013年04期

9 趙秉志;袁彬;;論憲法發(fā)展與刑法進步[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年10期

10 涂龍科;;經(jīng)濟刑法中危險犯的立法問題研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年08期

，

本文編號：1656576