本文選題：期貨　切入點：搶先交易　出處：《政治與法律》2017年09期

【摘要】：證券市場"搶先交易"被視為操縱證券市場行為且被納入刑事司法規(guī)制,期貨交易行為雖然在微觀上與證券交易行為存在差異,但兩者在金融市場屬性、違法性要素等方面存在同質(zhì)性。通過參考證券市場"搶先交易"的理論之爭,并考察域外期貨操縱犯罪中"搶先交易"的相關(guān)規(guī)定,期貨市場"搶先交易"應(yīng)當(dāng)予以刑法規(guī)制具有實質(zhì)合理性。在納入刑法規(guī)制時,該行為的實施主體、主觀意圖、客觀行為要素應(yīng)當(dāng)作充分的論證。
[Abstract]:The "preemptive trading" in the securities market is regarded as manipulation of the securities market and brought into the criminal judicial regulation. Although there are differences between the futures trading behavior and the securities trading behavior at the micro level, the two behaviors have the attributes in the financial market. By referring to the theory of "preemptive trading" in the securities market, and examining the relevant provisions of "preemptive trading" in overseas futures manipulation crimes, The "preemptive transaction" in futures market should be regulated by criminal law with substantial reasonableness. When it is included in the criminal law regulation, the implementing subject, subjective intention and objective behavior elements of this act should be fully demonstrated.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學(xué);
【分類號】：D924.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 方少婧;;簡論證券、期貨犯罪[J];科教文匯(中旬刊);2008年02期

2 袁永超;期貨透支交易罪立法化研究[J];福建公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報.社會公共安全研究;2001年05期

3 劉憲權(quán);證券、期貨犯罪的刑事立法及其完善[J];法學(xué);2004年05期

4 彭少輝;;非法經(jīng)營黃金期貨若干問題探討——對上海松江“4·18”系列非法經(jīng)營黃金期貨案的思考[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年03期

，

本文編號：1657516