本文選題：拒不執(zhí)行判決、裁定罪　切入點(diǎn)：客觀要件　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 拒不執(zhí)行判決、裁定罪嚴(yán)重?fù)p害了人民法院生效裁判的權(quán)威。在理論與司法實(shí)踐中,對(duì)拒不執(zhí)行判決、裁定罪的認(rèn)定還存在著較大的爭(zhēng)議,直接影響了該罪的正確適用。究其原因,主要在于對(duì)拒不執(zhí)行判決、裁定罪客觀要件的認(rèn)識(shí)上存在分歧。本文從拒不執(zhí)行判決、裁定罪的客觀要件入手,著重對(duì)該罪的犯罪行為、犯罪對(duì)象和犯罪情節(jié)等要素進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)分析。 拒不執(zhí)行判決、裁定罪的犯罪行為由兩部分構(gòu)成,其中,“有能力執(zhí)行”是前提條件,“拒不執(zhí)行”是內(nèi)容。在行為方式上,該罪只能由不作為的方式構(gòu)成,且既包括積極身體舉動(dòng)的方式,也包含消極身體舉動(dòng)的方式;既包括暴力的方式,也包括非暴力的方式;既包括公然的方式,也包括隱蔽的方式。在行為的起算時(shí)間上,應(yīng)以法院裁判生效為準(zhǔn)。 在犯罪對(duì)象的范圍上,判決、裁定僅指法院依法定程序作出的具有執(zhí)行內(nèi)容的生效判決和裁定,不包含法院的其他法律文書,如調(diào)解書、決定、通知、支付令、函等。 在犯罪情節(jié)上,只有“情節(jié)嚴(yán)重”方能構(gòu)成本罪,情節(jié)是否嚴(yán)重,可從行為、行為的后果、執(zhí)行標(biāo)的等方面進(jìn)行判斷。 本文最后還針對(duì)拒不執(zhí)行判決、裁定罪在立法及司法實(shí)踐中存在的問(wèn)題,從修改“執(zhí)行”一詞的表述及擴(kuò)大該罪犯罪對(duì)象的范圍等兩方面提出了完善的建議。
[Abstract]:Refusing to carry out a judgment seriously damages the authority of the people's court's effective judgment. In theory and judicial practice, there is still a great dispute over the determination of the adjudged crime for refusing to execute the judgment. It has a direct impact on the correct application of the crime. The main reason for the investigation is that there are differences in the understanding of the objective elements of refusing to execute the judgment and ruling the crime. This article starts with the objective elements of refusing to execute the judgment and ruling on the crime. The author analyzes the elements of the crime, such as the crime, the object and the circumstances of the crime in detail. The criminal act of refusing to execute the judgment consists of two parts, among which "having the ability to execute" is the precondition, and "refusing to execute" is the content. In the way of behavior, the crime can only be constituted by omission. Including both positive and negative physical actions; violent as well as non-violent; overt as well as covert. The entry into force of the decision of the court shall prevail. In the scope of the object of the crime, the judgment or order refers only to the effective judgment and order with enforcement content made by the court in accordance with the legal procedure, and does not include other legal instruments of the court, such as a conciliation statement, decision, notice, payment order, letter, etc. In terms of the circumstances of the crime, only the "serious circumstances" can constitute the crime, whether the circumstances are serious or not, can be judged from the aspects of the behavior, the consequences of the act, the target of execution, and so on. Finally, aiming at the problems existing in the legislation and judicial practice of refusing to execute the judgment and ruling the crime, the author puts forward some perfect suggestions from the aspects of modifying the expression of the word "execution" and expanding the scope of the object of the crime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曾艷;如何認(rèn)定拒不執(zhí)行法院判決、裁定罪[J];法律適用;1997年08期

2 張英霞;關(guān)于拒不執(zhí)行裁判罪條款的立法疏漏及其彌補(bǔ)——一個(gè)比較法視角的分析[J];法律適用;2004年11期

3 魏昌東,楊太蘭;拒不執(zhí)行判決、裁定罪客觀方面基本內(nèi)容的確定郁某拒不執(zhí)行判決、裁定案[J];法律適用;2005年03期

4 肖文昌;拒不執(zhí)行人民法院判決裁定罪的若干問(wèn)題探討[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1995年01期

5 李俊杰;論拒不執(zhí)行判決罪的犯罪構(gòu)成[J];河北法學(xué);1992年01期

6 王立志;;以拒不執(zhí)行判決、裁定罪為切入點(diǎn)論憲政的形式合理性[J];河南教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年06期

7 汪紅飛;論完善拒不執(zhí)行判決、裁定罪[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

8 黃萃蕓,葉水江;淺談拒不執(zhí)行判決、裁定罪認(rèn)定中的若干問(wèn)題[J];黎明職業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

9 張愛(ài)軍;對(duì)拒不執(zhí)行法院判決、裁定者追究刑事責(zé)任的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];山西高等學(xué)校社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

10 張中強(qiáng);拒不執(zhí)行法院判決、裁定罪若干問(wèn)題探討[J];法學(xué)論壇;1997年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1640736