本文選題：貪污賄賂犯罪　切入點(diǎn)：定罪　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前,我國的反腐呼聲前所未有,人民群眾對于貪腐現(xiàn)象的懲治要求強(qiáng)烈,而黨和政府對此異常重視。特別是黨的十八大召開之后,將反腐工作擺上重要地位,加大反腐力度,合并成立監(jiān)察委員會,將反腐工作推到最前線。從最開始提出的把“權(quán)力關(guān)進(jìn)制度的籠子”到現(xiàn)在的“老虎蒼蠅一起打”,無一不顯示了新一屆中央政府對反腐工作的重視,貪污受賄犯罪在腐敗犯罪中居于重要地位,是最常見易發(fā)的腐敗犯罪,對貪污受賄罪的定罪量刑是預(yù)防懲治腐敗現(xiàn)象發(fā)生的有效手段,定罪量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是否合理,是否適應(yīng)社會發(fā)展,無一不對反腐工作產(chǎn)生重大影響,作為具有謙抑性的《刑法》對定罪量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的設(shè)置,將對已經(jīng)犯罪的腐敗分子起到震懾作用,對其他人員起到預(yù)防作用,同時(shí),考慮到人民大眾目前對反腐工作的高度關(guān)注度,貪污受賄類犯罪的定罪量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)就顯得尤其引人注目。就目前而言,《刑法修正案九》的出臺,一定程度上適應(yīng)了當(dāng)前社會的發(fā)展,《刑法修正案九》對貪污受賄犯罪作出了重要的修改,伴隨著2016年4月18日公布的《最高人民法院、最高人民檢察院關(guān)于辦理貪污賄賂刑事案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》的出臺,反腐敗工作又多一利器,對司法工作人員在司法實(shí)踐中如何定罪量刑給出了明確的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。然而,由于各地經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平的不同,關(guān)于犯罪數(shù)額在貪污受賄犯罪定罪量刑中應(yīng)居于何種地位,貪污受賄犯罪數(shù)額標(biāo)準(zhǔn)全國統(tǒng)一確定是否合理,貪污受賄罪是否分立,貪污受賄犯罪財(cái)產(chǎn)刑和生命刑的思考等,這些涉及如何更好的設(shè)置二罪法定刑的問題依然引發(fā)社會各界的廣泛爭議。因此,研究貪污受賄罪定罪量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)具有十分重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本文計(jì)劃以刑法及其修正案為視角,旨在通過對我國現(xiàn)行刑法中對貪污受賄犯罪定罪量刑規(guī)定的分析,對現(xiàn)行刑法規(guī)定的積極意義,存在的缺陷進(jìn)行研究,對當(dāng)前我國刑法中關(guān)于貪污受賄犯罪提出可行的建議。全文計(jì)劃分三大部分,第一部分主要是對中外貪污受賄犯罪定罪量刑規(guī)定的演化歷史進(jìn)行研究分析對比,了解貪污受賄犯罪的歷史淵源,找出可借鑒之處。第二部分主要是對我國現(xiàn)行刑法也就是刑法修正案九中的亮點(diǎn)和重點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了闡述和分析,肯定了刑九的積極貢獻(xiàn),同時(shí)從理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)出發(fā),找出現(xiàn)行規(guī)定的不足之處。第三部分主要是針對查找出來的不足,提出相應(yīng)的建議或解決辦法。
[Abstract]:At present, the voice of anti-corruption in our country is unprecedented, and the people's demand for the punishment of corruption is strong, and the party and government attach great importance to it. Especially after the 18 National Congress of the Party, the anti-corruption work has been placed in an important position and anti-corruption efforts have been stepped up. The merger and establishment of a supervisory committee to push the anti-corruption work to the forefront. From the first proposal to put power in the cage of the system, to the present "tiger and fly fight together," all of them showed the importance attached by the new central government to anti-corruption work. The crime of corruption and bribery plays an important role in the crime of corruption and is the most common crime of corruption. The conviction and sentencing of the crime of corruption and bribery is an effective means to prevent and punish the phenomenon of corruption, and whether the standard of conviction and sentencing is reasonable or not. Whether or not to adapt to social development will have a significant impact on anti-corruption work. As a modest setting of the standard for conviction and sentencing in the Criminal Law, it will serve as a deterrent to corrupt elements who have already committed crimes and will play a preventive role for other personnel. At the same time, in view of the high level of public concern over anti-corruption, the standard of conviction and sentencing for corruption and bribery crimes is particularly striking. For the time being, the Ninth Amendment to the Criminal Law has been introduced. To a certain extent, it has adapted to the current social development. The Ninth Amendment to the Criminal Law has made important amendments to the crime of corruption and bribery, along with the publication of the Supreme people's Court on April 18th 2016. The introduction of the Supreme people's Procuratorate's explanation of some issues applicable to the Law in handling Criminal cases of Corruption and bribery. The introduction of the Supreme people's Procuratorate has given a clear standard on how judicial personnel can be convicted and sentenced in judicial practice. Because of the difference in the level of economic development in various places, what position should the amount of crime in the conviction and sentencing of corruption and bribery crime stand, whether the national standard of the amount of corruption and bribery crime is reasonable or not, and whether the crime of corruption and bribery is divided, Thinking about the crime of embezzlement and bribery, property penalty and life penalty, these problems related to how to better establish the legal penalty of second crime still cause wide controversy in all walks of life. It is of great practical significance to study the standard of conviction and sentencing for the crime of corruption and bribery. From the angle of criminal law and its amendment, this paper aims to analyze the sentencing provisions of conviction for corruption and bribery in the current criminal law of our country. This paper studies the positive significance and defects of the current criminal law, and puts forward some feasible suggestions on the crime of corruption and bribery in the current criminal law of our country. The full text plan is divided into three parts. The first part is mainly to analyze and compare the evolution history of conviction and sentencing provisions of corruption and bribery crime in China and abroad, to understand the historical origin of corruption and bribery crime. The second part mainly expounds and analyzes the highlights and emphases of the current criminal law of our country, that is, the ninth amendment of the criminal law, affirms the positive contribution of the nine sentences, and sets out from the theory and reality at the same time. Find out the shortcomings of the existing regulations. The third part is to put forward the corresponding suggestions or solutions in view of the deficiencies found out.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬曉霞;;淺析刑法“終身監(jiān)禁”之適用[J];法制與社會;2016年36期

2 趙遠(yuǎn);商浩文;;論貪污受賄犯罪死刑適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的合理確定[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2016年06期

3 宋久華;;論《刑法修正案(九)》中的職業(yè)禁止制度[J];刑法論叢;2016年01期

4 陳燕紅;;貪污賄賂罪的死刑存廢問題研究[J];法制博覽;2015年35期

5 王濤;;關(guān)于貪污賄賂犯罪修正內(nèi)容的述評[J];犯罪研究;2015年05期

6 汪勇;;《刑法修正案(九)》對貪污罪的修訂及適用[J];中國審判;2015年20期

7 王林林;;論貪污、受賄罪的定罪量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)——以《刑法修正案(九)(草案)》為研究視角[J];刑法論叢;2015年02期

8 王文華;;貪污受賄罪定罪量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的立法修改完善問題研究[J];刑法論叢;2015年02期

9 閆雨;;貪污受賄犯罪二元分立的定罪量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究[J];江西社會科學(xué);2015年08期

10 趙秉志;;貪污受賄犯罪定罪量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問題研究[J];中國法學(xué);2015年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 郭振綱;;“重特大貪污受賄犯罪或被終身監(jiān)禁”的多重意義[N];工人日報(bào);2015年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳淵崛;貪污受賄案件量刑問題研究[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2016年

2 段洪彬;論受賄罪的認(rèn)定[D];對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：1642146