本文選題：侵占罪　切入點(diǎn)：財(cái)物　出處：《天津師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：侵占罪的本質(zhì)特征在于將占有的他人財(cái)物非法據(jù)為己有,侵占罪的認(rèn)定與占有制度緊密相連。本文基于刑法對(duì)侵占罪的規(guī)定,結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐中的具體情形,圍繞理論研究中所存在的難題,分三部分對(duì)侵占罪的對(duì)象、客觀要件和司法認(rèn)定進(jìn)行分析和探討,力圖能夠得出最符合我國(guó)現(xiàn)實(shí)的結(jié)論。 第一部分是對(duì)侵占罪的犯罪對(duì)象的探討。認(rèn)同委托物侵占的對(duì)象為代為保管的他人財(cái)物,代為保管是反映事實(shí)上的某種占有關(guān)系,與占有關(guān)系是否合法無(wú)關(guān)。此外本章還針對(duì)遺忘物與埋藏物如何界定進(jìn)行了探討。 第二部分是圍繞著侵占罪的客觀方面展開,通過(guò)分析非法占為己有和拒不退還或拒不交出的含義、表現(xiàn)形式等方面的特點(diǎn),結(jié)合理論界各種說(shuō)法,提出了拒不退還或拒不交出應(yīng)為侵占罪構(gòu)成要件等看法。 第三部分主要針對(duì)司法實(shí)踐中侵占罪的認(rèn)定提出自己的看法,突出研究了侵占罪與民法中相關(guān)規(guī)定的區(qū)分,重點(diǎn)分析了侵占罪與盜竊罪在司法實(shí)踐中的區(qū)別,在這一問(wèn)題中,著重總結(jié)了侵占罪存在于法律實(shí)踐中的具體形態(tài)及其與盜竊罪等相關(guān)罪名易混淆的部分,以求能為法律實(shí)踐中侵占罪的準(zhǔn)確認(rèn)定提供幫助。
[Abstract]:The essential characteristic of the crime of embezzlement lies in the illegal appropriation of the property of others in possession, and the identification of the crime of embezzlement is closely related to the system of possession. This article is based on the provisions of the criminal law on the crime of embezzlement, combined with the specific situation in judicial practice. Focusing on the problems existing in the theoretical research, this paper analyzes and discusses the object, objective elements and judicial cognizance of the crime of embezzlement in three parts, in order to reach the conclusion that is most in line with the reality of our country. The first part is the discussion of the object of crime of embezzlement. This chapter also discusses how to define forgotten objects and buried objects. The second part focuses on the objective aspects of the crime of embezzlement, through the analysis of the meaning of illegal appropriation and refusal to return or surrender, the form of expression and other aspects of the characteristics, combined with the theory of various statements. The author puts forward that refusing to return or not to surrender should be the constitutive elements of the crime of embezzlement. The third part focuses on the identification of embezzlement in judicial practice, highlighting the distinction between the crime of embezzlement and the relevant provisions of the civil law, focusing on the analysis of the difference between the crime of embezzlement and the crime of theft in judicial practice. This paper summarizes the concrete forms of the crime of embezzlement in the legal practice and its confusing parts with the related charges such as theft in order to provide help for the accurate identification of the crime of embezzlement in the legal practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭麗萍;論侵占罪的犯罪對(duì)象及其立法完善[J];北京市政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

2 陳立;非法占有遺忘物行為問(wèn)題新論[J];法學(xué)雜志;2001年04期

3 王作富;略論侵占罪的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)雜志;1998年01期

4 杜國(guó)強(qiáng);關(guān)于侵占罪若干問(wèn)題的思考[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2002年06期

5 劉三木;關(guān)于侵占罪客觀行為方面幾個(gè)爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題的探討[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年06期

6 葉希善;侵占遺忘物和盜竊遺忘物的區(qū)別新議——修正的二重控制論[J];法學(xué);2005年08期

7 吳占英;伊士國(guó);;我國(guó)立法的價(jià)值取向初探[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

8 羅斌;劉少夫;;侵占罪中的埋藏物之辨析[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年33期

9 田明海,畢秀麗;如何認(rèn)定侵占罪中的“拒不退還”[J];河北法學(xué);2000年02期

10 馮兆蕙;侵占罪論[J];河北法學(xué);2002年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1595171