本文選題：村官　切入點：職務犯罪　出處：《西南大學》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 近年來,隨著農村經濟的發(fā)展,村官貪污受賄、挪用公款的案件越來越多,涉及資金越來越大,社會影響也越來越惡劣,嚴重威脅了農村社會的穩(wěn)定。針對日益嚴重的村官職務犯罪問題,我國刑法卻規(guī)定不明：1997年刑法根本沒有將村官納入職務犯罪的主體范圍；2000年通過的立法解釋也只概括列舉了村民委員會等村基層組織人員在從事特定的七項行為時依國家工作人員論,可以構成職務犯罪,對村基層組織還包括哪些組織,除這七項行為以外的行為能不能構成職務犯罪,不能構成職務犯罪構成什么犯罪等問題都沒有規(guī)定。這一立法現(xiàn)狀造成了司法實踐中對村官職務犯罪定性不清,處罰不當?shù)慕Y果。筆者通過到四川省簡陽市三岔鎮(zhèn)農村進行實地調查取得的一手資料,結合學界對村官職務犯罪問題研究取得的寶貴經驗,對我國村官職務犯罪問題進行了研究,以期有利于解決司法實踐中出現(xiàn)的村官職務犯罪問題,對農村經濟的發(fā)展,農村社會的穩(wěn)定有所幫助。 本文重新界定了村官職務犯罪主體。結合我國民間說法,并根據(jù)現(xiàn)有法律的規(guī)定,筆者認為,村基層組織主要包括：村自治組織、村黨支部組織、村經濟組織三類,并論證了將這些組織納入職務犯罪主體范圍的依據(jù)。 關于村官職務犯罪的行為,由于村官從事的工作多樣,在確定村官是否構成職務犯罪時,要嚴格區(qū)分村官從事工作的性質。本文認為,村官只有在依法從事公務時才能構成職務犯罪,在從事村自治事務和村級經營活動中,利用職務之便從事的犯罪行為,構成職務侵占罪、挪用資金罪和非國家工作人員受賄罪。 本文總結了村官職務犯罪具有的主要特點,其中犯罪數(shù)量增加、涉案金額上升是村官職務犯罪的趨勢所在。導致村官職務犯罪的原因是多方面的,立法不周、司法不清、執(zhí)法不嚴是村官職務犯罪的法律原因；制度不完善引起的監(jiān)督缺位、打擊乏力是主要的社會原因；村官自身思想素質不高、權力意識錯誤是主要的主體原因。 針對村官職務犯罪發(fā)生的原因,本文最后提出了三大預防對策。法律預防：加強村官職務犯罪問題的理論研究為立法提供依據(jù)；完善對村官職務犯罪構成的立法為司法提供依據(jù)；嚴格區(qū)分司法實踐大力打擊村官職務犯罪。社會預防：將村官編制化進行正規(guī)管理,進行村官在職離職審計,加強監(jiān)督管理。主體預防：對村官進行思想教育,讓其樹立正確的價值觀和權力觀,從根本上保證其“不想”犯罪。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the development of rural economy, village officials have taken bribes and embezzled public funds more and more, involving more and more funds, and the social impact is becoming more and more bad. Has seriously threatened the stability of rural society. In view of the increasingly serious crimes committed by village officials, In 1997, the criminal law did not include village officials in the scope of the subject of duty crime. The legislative interpretation passed in 2000 only outlined the seven specific acts of village grassroots organizations such as villagers' committees. According to the theory of state functionaries, May constitute a duty crime. As to which organizations are also included in the village grass-roots organizations, can the acts other than these seven acts constitute a duty crime? There are no regulations on what kind of crime can not be constituted by duty crime. This legislative situation has resulted in unclear characterization of village official duty crime in judicial practice. The result of improper punishment. The author, through the field investigation in the rural area of Sancha Town, Jianyang City, Sichuan Province, combined with the valuable experience gained by the academic circles in the study of the crime of village officials' official duties, This paper studies the problem of village official duty crime in our country in order to solve the problem of village official duty crime in judicial practice and to help the development of rural economy and the stability of rural society. This paper redefines the subject of the crime of village official duty. According to the folk view of our country, and according to the existing law, the author thinks that the basic organization of village mainly includes three types: village autonomous organization, village party branch organization, village economic organization, etc. It also demonstrates the basis of bringing these organizations into the scope of the subject of duty crime. Regarding the behavior of village official duty crime, because the village official is engaged in many kinds of work, when determining whether the village official constitutes duty crime, it is necessary to distinguish strictly the nature of village official doing the work. Only when village officials are engaged in official duties according to law can they constitute job-related crimes. In the activities of village autonomy and village management, the crime of taking advantage of their duties constitutes the crime of duty embezzlement, misappropriation of funds and bribery of non-state functionaries. This paper summarizes the main characteristics of village official duty crime, in which the increase in the number of crimes and the increase in the amount of money involved is the trend of the village official duty crime. The reasons leading to the village official duty crime are various, the legislation is inadequate, the administration of justice is not clear. Lax enforcement of the law is the legal reason for the crime of village officials' official duties; the absence of supervision caused by imperfect system and the weakness of crackdown are the main social reasons; the village officials' own ideological quality is not high, and the main main cause is the wrong consciousness of power. In view of the causes of village official duty crime, this paper finally puts forward three major preventive countermeasures. Legal prevention: strengthening the theoretical study of village official duty crime provides the basis for legislation; Perfect the legislation on the constitution of the village official duty crime to provide the basis for the judicature; strictly distinguish the judicial practice and vigorously crack down on the village official duty crime. Strengthen supervision and management. Main body prevention: carry on the ideological education to the village officials, let them set up the correct values and the view of power, guarantee their "do not want" the crime fundamentally.
【學位授予單位】：西南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D917

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前6條

1 肖子棋;湖南L縣農村基層干部職務犯罪問題調查[D];遼寧大學;2011年

2 黃怡;職務侵占罪疑難問題研究[D];上海交通大學;2012年

3 李宇;農村基層自治組織人員職務犯罪防治對策[D];遼寧大學;2012年

4 郭圣彬;村務管理的亂象與出路[D];南昌大學;2012年

5 霍夢;關于廣西壯族自治區(qū)桂林市中級人民法院審理的村官職務犯罪問題的研究[D];廣西師范大學;2013年

6 楊瑤;村官職務犯罪研究[D];湘潭大學;2012年

，

本文編號：1593917