本文關(guān)鍵詞： 基于合意 自我答責(zé) 客觀歸責(zé) 利益思考 容許風(fēng)險　出處：《交大法學(xué)》2016年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】："基于合意的他者危險化"場合中,用被害人自我答責(zé)理論直接排除行為人的不法的觀點(diǎn)值得商榷。被害人自我答責(zé)本身只能是結(jié)論而非對該結(jié)論的論證,同時,得出被害人自我答責(zé)的結(jié)論并非當(dāng)然和排除行為人的不法畫上等號,而應(yīng)當(dāng)在具體情境下進(jìn)行個案認(rèn)定。將傳統(tǒng)的客觀歸責(zé)理論與被害人教義學(xué)相糅合,以行為的"風(fēng)險創(chuàng)設(shè)—風(fēng)險實(shí)現(xiàn)"為思考主線,以刑法中的利益分析為思考基點(diǎn),重構(gòu)出一種綜合的歸責(zé)理論,以此在該場合中分別對行為人和被害人的行為做出評價,并確定歸責(zé),是解決問題的合理路徑。
[Abstract]:In the case of "danger of the other based on consensus", the view that the theory of victim's self-answer directly precludes the wrongfulness of the actor is debatable. The victim's self-responsibilityitself can only be a conclusion, not a demonstration of the conclusion, at the same time, The conclusion that the victim should answer for himself is not the same sign as the one that excludes the wrongdoer, but should be determined in the specific situation. The traditional objective imputation theory is combined with the dogmatics of the victim. Taking the "risk creation-risk realization" of behavior as the main line of thinking, taking the benefit analysis in criminal law as the starting point, the author reconstructs a comprehensive imputation theory to evaluate the behavior of the actor and the victim respectively in this situation. Ascertaining the imputation is the reasonable way to solve the problem.
【作者單位】： 中國政法大學(xué)刑事司法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D924
，

本文編號：1538226