本文關(guān)鍵詞： “快播案” 中立行為 客觀歸責(zé) 行為反證 司法推定　出處：《寧波廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)》2016年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的開發(fā)和運(yùn)用涉及刑法中的"中立行為"。運(yùn)用客觀歸責(zé)理論否認(rèn)中立行為違法性的觀點(diǎn),割裂了構(gòu)成要件和違法性的關(guān)系,混淆了"技術(shù)開發(fā)"和"技術(shù)運(yùn)用"的行為屬性。犯罪構(gòu)成要件承擔(dān)著禁止性評(píng)價(jià)的規(guī)范功能,行為對(duì)客觀要件和主觀要件的符合性是刑法歸責(zé)的依據(jù)。在主觀要件認(rèn)定中,行為反證和司法推定是判斷網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)犯罪主觀故意的重要方法。在"快播案"中,快播公司及其責(zé)任人員濫用P2P技術(shù),使公司內(nèi)部服務(wù)器成為淫穢視頻源,提供檢索和播放服務(wù),并通過文件碎片技術(shù)、虛置信息審查機(jī)制等方式逃避監(jiān)管,符合《刑法》第363條規(guī)定的構(gòu)成要件,應(yīng)認(rèn)定傳播淫穢物品牟利罪。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)濫用的法律應(yīng)對(duì)中,應(yīng)完善前置性的技術(shù)操作規(guī)程,銜接不同性質(zhì)的法律責(zé)任,使法律在犯罪風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)創(chuàng)新保護(hù)中取得平衡。
[Abstract]:The development and application of network technology involves the "neutral act" in criminal law. Using objective imputation theory to deny the illegality of neutral act, the relationship between constitutive elements and illegality is severed. It confuses the behavioral attributes of "technology development" and "technology application". The constitutive elements of crime assume the normative function of prohibited evaluation. The conformity of behavior to objective elements and subjective elements is the basis of criminal law imputation. In the subjective elements, the proof of behavior and the judicial presumption are the important methods to judge the subjective intention of network technology crime. Rapier companies and their responsible personnel abuse P2P technology, make the company's internal servers become obscene video sources, provide retrieval and playback services, and through document fragmentation technology, virtual information censorship mechanism and other ways to escape supervision. In accordance with the constitutive requirements stipulated in Article 363 of the Criminal Law, the crime of spreading obscene articles for profit should be recognized. In the legal response to the abuse of network technology, the pre-technical operating rules should be perfected. Linking up different kinds of legal responsibility makes the law balance between crime risk control and Internet innovation protection.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學(xué)法律學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D924
【正文快照】： 一、引言:“快播案”中的網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)分析 隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)信息技術(shù)的快速發(fā)展,中國已經(jīng)步入了網(wǎng)絡(luò)化和信息化時(shí)代�；ヂ�(lián)網(wǎng)接入、云存儲(chǔ)、廣告推廣、交易中介平臺(tái)等信息技術(shù)的運(yùn)用給人們提供了全新的社會(huì)空間和生活方式。但是,在享受互聯(lián)網(wǎng)帶來的生活便利同時(shí),利用網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)侵犯知識(shí)產(chǎn)，

本文編號(hào)：1457265