本文關(guān)鍵詞： 數(shù)額犯 數(shù)額累計(jì) 多次 犯罪行為 未經(jīng)處理　出處：《海南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：數(shù)額累計(jì)制度的存在,一方面適應(yīng)了我國(guó)“既定性又定量”刑事立法模式下“犯罪”概念的要求,另一方面這一制度也通過(guò)累計(jì)計(jì)算方式使數(shù)個(gè)罪輕情形按罪重情形來(lái)處理,更好地實(shí)現(xiàn)罪刑均衡原則。但目前我國(guó)刑事立法及刑事司法解釋對(duì)于數(shù)額累計(jì)的中心術(shù)語(yǔ)如“多次”、“未經(jīng)處理”等的規(guī)定還存在相矛盾之處,并且,刑事司法實(shí)踐中數(shù)額累計(jì)也面臨著如針對(duì)同一對(duì)象的多次行為如何進(jìn)行數(shù)額累計(jì)以及選擇罪名下如何進(jìn)行數(shù)額累計(jì)等問(wèn)題的適用存在困境。鑒于此,本文期望通過(guò)對(duì)數(shù)額累計(jì)制度的上述問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析、界定,促使該制度在我國(guó)更好地適用。全文主要分為三個(gè)部分： 第一部分是數(shù)額累計(jì)的規(guī)范梳理和學(xué)理分析。數(shù)額累計(jì)制度在我國(guó)刑法中的規(guī)定是統(tǒng)一和簡(jiǎn)單的,但刑事司法解釋對(duì)此制度的規(guī)定卻是矛盾的。數(shù)額累計(jì)制度在多次行為中涉及行為均為同質(zhì)的犯罪行為時(shí),應(yīng)以多次行為屬于獨(dú)立還是連續(xù)的同質(zhì)行為作為區(qū)分點(diǎn),分別以多次一罪說(shuō)和連續(xù)犯說(shuō)作為理論基礎(chǔ)；當(dāng)在多次行為中有違法行為時(shí),則以連續(xù)行為說(shuō)作為理論基礎(chǔ)。數(shù)額累計(jì)制度適應(yīng)了我國(guó)刑事立法中對(duì)犯罪概念中量的要求,也適應(yīng)了罪行均衡原則中“區(qū)別”的內(nèi)涵。從社會(huì)的立場(chǎng)及社會(huì)危害性量變到質(zhì)變的規(guī)律出發(fā),數(shù)額累計(jì)制度應(yīng)當(dāng)可以擴(kuò)展至所有的數(shù)額犯。 第二部分為數(shù)額累計(jì)既有規(guī)范中核心術(shù)語(yǔ)的解釋,主要是對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑法和有關(guān)刑事司法解釋中數(shù)額累計(jì)規(guī)定的四個(gè)核心術(shù)語(yǔ)(“多次”、“行為”、“未經(jīng)處理”以及“時(shí)效”)進(jìn)行理解和界定。數(shù)額累計(jì)制度中的“多次”應(yīng)界定為兩次及兩次以上,從而有利于維護(hù)法制度的完整；數(shù)額累計(jì)制度中的“行為”應(yīng)界定為既包括犯罪行為也包括違法行為；數(shù)額累計(jì)制度中的“未經(jīng)處理”應(yīng)明確為“未經(jīng)行政處罰”,從而實(shí)現(xiàn)數(shù)額累計(jì)制度升格多次行為犯罪化的功能；此外,數(shù)額累計(jì)制度應(yīng)該明確時(shí)效制度,對(duì)于達(dá)到犯罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的行為實(shí)行追訴時(shí)效制度,而對(duì)于違法行為適用行政時(shí)效。 第三部分是數(shù)額累計(jì)司法適用中疑難問(wèn)題的分析。主要對(duì)數(shù)額累計(jì)在司法適用中最為常見的四個(gè)疑難問(wèn)題,進(jìn)行詳細(xì)分析。針對(duì)同一對(duì)象多次行為的數(shù)額累計(jì),后次行為侵害新法益作為數(shù)額累計(jì)制度適用的前提；而在選擇罪名下,以“不同宗”作為數(shù)額累計(jì)制度適用的前提；在連環(huán)犯罪中,以行為人實(shí)際取得財(cái)物作為數(shù)額累計(jì)制度的適用條件；此外,在涉及到不同區(qū)域時(shí),數(shù)額累計(jì)制度下的數(shù)額標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以審判地為準(zhǔn),按照不同地的比率進(jìn)行折算。
[Abstract]:On the one hand, the existence of the accumulative amount system meets the requirements of the concept of "crime" under the criminal legislation mode of "established and quantitative" in our country. On the other hand, this system also makes several misdemeanor cases deal with serious cases by accumulative calculation. But at present, the central terms of criminal legislation and criminal judicial interpretation of the cumulative amount such as "many times", "untreated" and other provisions are still contradictory, and. In the practice of criminal justice, the accumulative amount of amount is also faced with difficulties such as how to accumulate the amount for the same object's multiple acts and how to carry out the amount accumulation under the selected charge. In view of this. This paper hopes to analyze and define the above problems of the accumulative sum system, so as to make the system more applicable in our country. The thesis is divided into three parts: The first part is the normative combing and theoretical analysis of the accumulative amount. The regulation of the accumulative amount system in the criminal law of our country is unified and simple. However, the criminal judicial interpretation of this system is contradictory. The amount of cumulative system in many acts involved in the conduct of the same nature of the crime. The distinction should be based on the theory that multiple acts are independent or continuous, and the theory of multiple crimes and continuous offenses should be taken as the theoretical basis respectively. When there are illegal acts in many acts, the theory of continuous act is taken as the theoretical basis. The accumulative amount system adapts to the requirement of quantity in the concept of crime in the criminal legislation of our country. It also adapts to the connotation of "distinction" in the principle of balance of crimes. From the standpoint of society and the law of social harmfulness changing to qualitative change, the system of accumulative sum of amount should be extended to all crime of amount. The second part is the interpretation of the core terms in the existing norms, mainly the four core terms ("multiple", "behavior") in the current criminal law and the relevant criminal judicial interpretation. "untreated" and "limitation") shall be understood and defined... the "multiple" in the accumulative system of amounts shall be defined as two or more times, thus contributing to the preservation of the integrity of the legal system; The "act" in the accumulative system of the amount should be defined as including both the criminal act and the illegal act; The "untreated" in the accumulative total amount system should be defined as "without administrative punishment", so as to realize the function of the amount accumulation system being upgraded to criminal behavior for many times; In addition, the system of accumulative sum of amount should define the system of limitation, implement the system of limitation of limitation for acts that meet the standard of crime, and apply administrative prescription for illegal acts. The third part is the amount of cumulative judicial application of the analysis of difficult problems, mainly the amount of cumulative in the judicial application of the most common four difficult problems. Detailed analysis. For the same object of multiple acts of the amount of cumulative, the latter acts against the new legal benefits as the premise of the application of the cumulative amount system; Under the choice of charges, "different families" as the premise of the application of the cumulative amount system; In the serial crime, take the actor actually obtains the property as the applicable condition of the accumulative amount system; In addition, when it comes to different regions, the amount criterion under the system of accumulation of amounts is based on the place of trial and converted at different rates.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王飛躍;;論一罪累計(jì)數(shù)量處罰制度的合理性[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年04期

2 趙秉志,吳林華;論盜竊罪數(shù)額的認(rèn)定問(wèn)題(下)[J];法律適用;1999年12期

3 �？饲�;;關(guān)于犯罪數(shù)額認(rèn)定中若干實(shí)踐問(wèn)題的理論思考[J];法律適用;2008年11期

4 孫春雨;;關(guān)于犯罪數(shù)額的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年03期

5 朱鐵軍;;犯罪數(shù)額累計(jì)問(wèn)題研究[J];法治研究;2009年10期

6 張勇;挪用公款罪疑難問(wèn)題探微[J];河北法學(xué);2003年04期

7 童偉華;數(shù)額犯若干問(wèn)題研究[J];華僑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年04期

8 儲(chǔ)槐植;;我國(guó)刑法中犯罪概念的定量因素[J];法學(xué)研究;1988年02期

9 王昭振;;數(shù)額犯中“數(shù)額”概念的展開[J];法學(xué)論壇;2006年03期

10 陳航;;累計(jì)數(shù)額刑事處罰制度研究[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2007年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1457226