本文關(guān)鍵詞： 犯罪定量模式 犯罪定量要素 但書 構(gòu)成要件 犯罪論體系　出處：《中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：犯罪定量問題是世界各國(guó)刑法都正在面臨的問題,但在刑法典中直接規(guī)定犯罪定量要素的做法形成了我國(guó)獨(dú)有的刑事立法模式,這與我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法文化及整體法秩序息息相關(guān)并且在短時(shí)間內(nèi)難以產(chǎn)生大的變動(dòng)。刑法第13條但書條款是我國(guó)刑法分則中犯罪定量要素的總源頭,在但書條款的統(tǒng)領(lǐng)下,犯罪定量要素可復(fù)分為法定的罪量要素與涵攝的罪量要素。法定罪量要素是指在刑法分則條文里明確規(guī)定的體現(xiàn)行為及結(jié)果程度的語詞,涵攝罪量要素是被但書條款無形地涵攝于構(gòu)成要件之中的罪量要素,它必須要依據(jù)具體罪名的規(guī)范保護(hù)目的并結(jié)合一定的刑法解釋方能解讀出來。關(guān)于法定罪量要素的性質(zhì)存在構(gòu)成要件要素說,罪量要件說與客觀處罰條件說之爭(zhēng),這些學(xué)理上的爭(zhēng)論在行為人對(duì)數(shù)額犯之?dāng)?shù)額產(chǎn)生認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤時(shí)的處理,后果犯責(zé)任形式的論爭(zhēng)以及情節(jié)犯之情節(jié)的性質(zhì)認(rèn)定上都得到了生動(dòng)體現(xiàn)。犯罪定量提示我們從刑罰適應(yīng)性的角度對(duì)犯罪成立進(jìn)行實(shí)質(zhì)性限定,在犯罪論中也要適當(dāng)斟酌刑事政策的要求,把握行為程度從而將不具有刑罰適應(yīng)性的行為排除在犯罪圈之外,這就是犯罪定量對(duì)犯罪論體系所產(chǎn)生的影響。
[Abstract]:The problem of quantitative crime is a problem that every country in the world is facing. However, the practice of providing quantitative elements of crime directly in the criminal law has formed a unique criminal legislation model in our country. This is closely related to the traditional law culture and the whole law order of our country and it is difficult to produce great changes in a short period of time. The proviso clause of the 13th criminal law is the total source of the quantitative elements of crime in the criminal law sub-rule of our country. Under the control of proviso, the quantitative elements of crime can be divided into the legal elements of crime quantity and the factor of the amount of crime. The elements of legal conviction amount refer to the words clearly stipulated in the provisions of the special provisions of the criminal law to reflect the degree of behavior and result. The incriminating quantity factor is an element of the crime quantity which is imperceptibly contained in the constitutive elements by the proviso clause. It must be based on the specific crime of the normative purpose of protection and combined with a certain interpretation of the criminal law can be interpreted. On the nature of the amount of legal conviction elements of the nature of the elements. The argument between the theory of the quantity of crime and the theory of objective punishment condition, these theoretical arguments are dealt with when the actor makes a mistake in understanding the amount of the amount of crime. The argument of the liability form of the consequence offender and the nature of the plot crime have been vividly reflected. The quantitative crime suggests us to limit the establishment of the crime from the angle of penalty adaptability. In the theory of crime, we should consider the requirements of criminal policy, grasp the degree of behavior and exclude the behavior without penalty adaptability from the criminal circle, which is the influence of crime quantification on the system of crime theory.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D914

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 勞東燕;;犯罪故意的要素分析模式[J];比較法研究;2009年01期

2 張明楷;論盜竊故意的認(rèn)識(shí)內(nèi)容[J];法學(xué);2004年11期

3 劉樹德;;論刑法第十三條“但書”規(guī)定[J];華東刑事司法評(píng)論;2004年02期

4 馮軍;德日刑法中的可罰性理論[J];法學(xué)論壇;2000年01期

5 陳興良;;形式解釋論的再宣示[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2010年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1457046